djmonkey
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 78
mad_chemist...I too am a bit fan of Plastikman...in fact, I'd say he's probably my favorite musician.
As for raves in 1985...ecstasy was not prevalent there simply because ecstasy was not prevalant in general. Once ecstasy was introdcued to the dance culture, the correlation quickly developed into what was in Oslo in 1999 and what it still is now. I have no arguments with the claim that Richie Hawtin's work is "more conducive to tripping"...BUT...I must point out that this is a point you are making based on your assessment of your own experience (ie an OPINION). What I have tried to do in my paper is take the population as a whole and look for trends. According to the epidemiological research that has been done, ON AVERAGE, the correlation between ecstasy use and a preference for electronic dance music is MORE prevalent than the correlation between LSD use and a preference for electronic dance music. Furthermore, this correlation is greater than some other common correlations involving drugs, such as those mentioned in the Oslo research.
To be quite honest with you, all other things being equal, if I were to choose a drug to take for the purpose of listening to CONSUMED, I would probably choose acid. But that doesn't really speak to my point. The point I am exploring in my paper is that there is a strange phenomenon that occurs when people take ecstasy...THEY START TO DEVELOP A GREATER INTEREST IN ELECTRONIC DANCE MUSIC. That may also be the case for LSD but I would assert that it is MORE SO the case for ecstasy.
I appreciate your posts so far. I am not trying to shut you up with my rebuttals...please continue!!!
AND TO THE REST OF YOU OUT THERE...anybody interested in sharing an idea or two???
As for raves in 1985...ecstasy was not prevalent there simply because ecstasy was not prevalant in general. Once ecstasy was introdcued to the dance culture, the correlation quickly developed into what was in Oslo in 1999 and what it still is now. I have no arguments with the claim that Richie Hawtin's work is "more conducive to tripping"...BUT...I must point out that this is a point you are making based on your assessment of your own experience (ie an OPINION). What I have tried to do in my paper is take the population as a whole and look for trends. According to the epidemiological research that has been done, ON AVERAGE, the correlation between ecstasy use and a preference for electronic dance music is MORE prevalent than the correlation between LSD use and a preference for electronic dance music. Furthermore, this correlation is greater than some other common correlations involving drugs, such as those mentioned in the Oslo research.
To be quite honest with you, all other things being equal, if I were to choose a drug to take for the purpose of listening to CONSUMED, I would probably choose acid. But that doesn't really speak to my point. The point I am exploring in my paper is that there is a strange phenomenon that occurs when people take ecstasy...THEY START TO DEVELOP A GREATER INTEREST IN ELECTRONIC DANCE MUSIC. That may also be the case for LSD but I would assert that it is MORE SO the case for ecstasy.
I appreciate your posts so far. I am not trying to shut you up with my rebuttals...please continue!!!
AND TO THE REST OF YOU OUT THERE...anybody interested in sharing an idea or two???