White House: Drug Policies Must Be Rooted in Science

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
http://ofsubstance.gov/blogs/pushing_back/archive/2011/06/06/51898.aspx

. . .

Our National Drug Control Strategy is science-based. And science shows that illegal drug use is associated with specialty treatment admissions, fatal drugged driving accidents, mental illness, and emergency room admissions. Illicit drug use has huge costs to our society, outside of just criminal justice costs.

A recent report by the Department of Justice's National Drug Intelligence Center about the economic impact of illicit drug use indicates that the costs of illicit drug use on health care and productivity alone, are over $80 billion. Making illicit drugs legal would not reduce any of these factors. Nor is drug use a victimless crime. Just last month, during a visit to the Pediatric Interim Care Center in Kent, Washington, I saw firsthand the tragic impact drug use has on newborn babies.

In addition, despite the Commission's assertions, efforts to reduce drug use over the last several decades have, in fact, achieved success. Overall drug use in the United States is half of what it was thirty years ago, cocaine production in Colombia has dropped by almost two-thirds, and the very same U.N. World Drug Report cited by the Commission concluded that, "Demand for cocaine in the U.S. has been in long-term decline."

This administration's efforts to reduce drug use are not born out of a culture war or drug war mentality, but rather out of the recognition that drug use strains our economy, public health, and public safety. The President's inaugural National Drug Control Strategy - released one year ago - focuses on both the public health and public safety aspects of drug use and addiction. It focuses on addiction as a disease and on the importance of preventing drug use, as well as providing treatment to those who need it, including those who are involved in the criminal justice system. For the first time, it emphasizes support for millions of individuals who are in recovery from drug addiction.

And the United States is not alone. Our international partners across the globe – including Mexico's President Calderon, Colombia's President Santos, and Costa Rica's President Miranda – have all clearly stated their opposition to drug legalization.

It is, of course, tempting to opt for seemingly easy answers to the world's drug problems. They appear intractable at times. But we have made real progress and the steps we take in the future must be rooted in science and evidence-based policies that will make our communities healthier and safer.

Gil Kerlikowske is the director of the National Drug Control Policy.
 
so they're dissolving the DEA, implementing psychedelics into psychiatry, setting up heroin maintenance programs in every city, widely distributing naloxone, standardizing cocaine and MDMA for market and pardoning all non-violent drug offenders? Go science!
 
Major co-sign on this article.

Case in point: the Controlled Substances Act, which places marijuana, psilocybin and mescaline in the same class as heroin, GHB and Aminorex. If you want to prohibit drugs, go after those with the most serious health risks only.
 
yes this is the most bizarre item I've read in a while.

The White House's blogs don't allow comments (shocker), but Congress's blog does. Find comments to this piece here:

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/164885-drug-policies-must-be-rooted-in-science

Oh man everyone is pissed. This is progress in my eyes. Everyone needs to go post their opposition/opinion on that site, copied from this thread of course. That article is the best example of obvious lies and corruption that I've seen in awhile. lol man those bloggers on the hill are furious.
 
lol man those bloggers on the hill are furious.

Nobody wants to pay for a government agency that's forced by law to lie. This explains it in detail:

The reason why Gil Kerlikowske doesn't speak truth and what he says can't be trusted or believed:
According to Title VII Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998:
Responsibilitie s: The Director "Drug Czar"
(12) shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that—
(A) is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and
(B) has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration;

On April 2, 2003, Congressman Ron Paul wrote a letter to the United States General Accounting Office (GAO) asking for an investigation into ONDCP lobbying activities and their dissemination of "misleading information" (a polite euphemism for "lying").

The GAO responded:
"Finally, apart from considerations of whether any particular law has been violated, you have asked whether the Deputy Director's letter disseminated misleading information in connection with statements relating to the debate over legalization of marijuana. […]
ONDCP is specifically charged with the responsibility for "taking such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of certain controlled substances such as marijuana" - a responsibility which logically could include the making of advocacy statements in opposition to legalization efforts. The Deputy Director's statements about marijuana are thus within the statutory role assigned to ONDCP. Given this role, we do not see a need to examine the accuracy of the Deputy Director's individual statements in detail."

By law, the drug czar must oppose any attempt to legalize the use (in any form). Despite the science, medical studies and evidence of medical cannabis safety and effectiveness, despite the fact that the federal government supplies it to patients, despite the fact the Department of Health and Human Services holds patents on cannabinoids for the therapeutic benefits, US Patent 663057 titled "Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectant s" which is assigned to The United States of America, as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services) the drug czar is required by law to lie about it. This renders the Office unreliable and a fraud.
BY ACTIVISTCAT on 06/06/2011 at 16:52
 
^exactly...what a corrupt law that is. Anybody can look at that and see the bad logic built into it, right? If that isn't a form of bad science then I don't know what is. He talks like he truely believes in the bad science that supports the drug war. If science doesn't matter then I guess it's ok for them to use bad science...lol what a bunch of crap
 
Last edited:
Nobody wants to pay for a government agency that's forced by law to lie. This explains it in detail:

lol damn i was just about to post that also. I love that guys points because everything he says is based solely off fact. No assumptions or nothing like that just plain and simple tells us what the drug czars job is and shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit isit ever and eye opener.

wtf does the drug czar even do? is keeping drugs illeagal his only job?

edit: i read this on another site and its freakin halirous anology

A terrible new epidemic is sweeping America, at great social cost. It’s street name is “lunch.” Lunch is taking millions of Americans away from their jobs in the very middle of the day, with enormous productivity losses. Lunch is a major contributor to obesity and higher health costs. “It is important that [lunch] be made as difficult and costly to obtain as possible. This points to the value of law enforcement efforts.”
 
Last edited:
god this article is nonsense, its always the same bullshit.. "llicit drug use indicates that the costs of illicit drug use on health care and productivity alone, are over $80 billion. Making illicit drugs legal would not reduce any of these factors. Nor is drug use a victimless crime. Just last month, during a visit to the Pediatric Interim Care Center in Kent, Washington, I saw firsthand the tragic impact drug use has on newborn babies."

Yeah that is the ONLY case where drug use is not a victimless crime. Where a pregnant women uses drugs while pregnant.
 
if he hadn't lost my vote earlier, it'd be gone now.

however, for the love of god, don't get a republican into office. they are even more brazen about ignoring or misrepresenting science, and even more moralist.
 
the american government will not allow drug reform until the citizens of the U.S. become angry, violent, and line the street to DEMAND change.
 
And that science must be firmly rooted in denial of things you do not agree with.
 
typical political tactic. Throw whatever your opponents are saying right back at them.

We say our drug policies should be based on science and whats shown to work and so they say the same thing about there policies.

I don't think its possible to be a politician and not have a serious neurosis of some kind. I just cant see how any of these people in the white house could be at all mentally healthy.
 
Top