• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Which 2c-x for first time?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, seconding B, I, C, or D, from what I've read.

I've only done I, and I can speak for it being pretty gentle, though yeah it does last quite a while.
 
I wouldn't start with 2C-I, it had a very uncomfortable and pervasive body load the first and only time I really tripped on it (but I also did 40-50mg which is a pretty high dose).

2C-B was my first real psychedelic experience and it was fantastic. Very worthwhile but forgiving chemical. The mindfuck aspect is very different from other psychs since you can kind of decide how intense it is. I haven't tried 2C-C or 2C-D but have heard they are both provide pretty flexible experiences too.

When I tried 2C-E I only parachuted 11mg, and while it was a very light and manageable trip, there was no real euphoria or anything, probably wouldn't qualify as "recreational" imo. Still, a decent psychedelic for sure.

NBOMe-Mescaline looks like the most worthwhile new psychedelic RC, really wouldn't mind trying some out, it's just too expensive for me.
 
2C-E was my first psychedelic (eyeballed dose approx 15-20mg), not counting salvia or nutmeg. I found it to be very visual and euphoric, without excessive body load or mind fuck. I guess other's find it to be a bit of a mind fuck. Honestly it was "gentler" than LSD, but YMMV . The most unusual thing about this psychedelic for me was that the closed eye visuals were EXTREMELY vivid. Not just vague fractals, but full blown kaleidescope effects and strange female entities. Honestly, I would highly recommend it, even as a first psychedelic.
 
No contest in my mind -- D. It is one of the most versatile and gentile phenethylamines, and also visually beautiful, short acting, and relatively free of body load.
 
I would say D also. Even a small dose of 18mg was a nice trip. The body high during the come up felt pretty cool.

I thought T-2 was pretty light and easy to handle at 20mg
 
I don't have personal experience with all of them but estimating that 2C-T-2 will approach 2C-T-7 this would be the scale from weak to strong I would place them:
2C-D < 2C-C < 2C-B < 2C-I < 2C-T-2 or 2C-T-7 < 2C-E
although 2C-T-7 can easily be as strong as 2C-E.

Considering 2C-D is a bit of a strange one that IMO leaves something to be desired, is too light for my taste at least until I really up the dose significantly.... go with 2C-C or 2C-B. They are both perfectly fit for the job.

Regarding rules: you are walking a fine line that can be very arbitrary since you cannot ask us what you should take but you can ask about which ones are generally easy and which ones are heavy. Everyone can draw their own conclusions from that so I am basically telling the rules are by definition a little flawed because the line is a little blurry. I will merge this thread together with ones asking the same thing although some may have been closed because the intention of choosing a starting material was too obvious.

Now, what you should do after all of this what you shouldn't do is read up on every of these materials by visiting their Big & Dandy Threads, visiting Erowid and looking up reports and checking PIHKAL on them as well. Then you can make your own informed decision and understand better why you will be taking something rather than going by someone simply advising you do do this or that.

At best I hope you do this personal research before taking something, you will be glad you did and it is exciting to read about anyway. At worst I hope this thread will give people a general first impression of how 2C-X compounds are rated as starting material, so that they won't accidentally start off with the strongest one.

Hopefully this is cleared up a bit for those looking into starting experiments, it is probably not the first time this is covered but what the hell.
 
Last edited:
Interesting, I find 2C-C to be weak, bland, and unsatisfying, but 2C-D to be my favorite phen (albeit weak on an mg-for-mg basis, needing dosage in excess of 50-60mg usually). Point being individual taste matters a lot.
 
YMMV always :) yeah really, that much is true.

I think you can tell that 2C-B, 2C-C and 2C-D are recommended the most to begin with, then 2C-I and then others, the frequency at which people recommend them is reflected in the range I listed, or so it seems.

Actually this thread should be closed, just like the others have been. A limited perspective is all that I feel could be worthwhile, any further discussion might be abused as a substitute for doing your own research.
So people wondering which drug they should take, read up on them and decide for yourself.

La Fin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top