Which 2c gives the best visual hallucinations?

[ryandnb]

2cb 2ce or 2ci? erowid doesnt seem to tell me which one gives the best visuals

 

[Tranced]

2cb 2ce or 2ci? erowid doesnt seem to tell me which one gives the best visuals

I haven't taken them all, but I can vouch against 2c-b, 2c-i and 2c-d. They are certainly visual, but the empathogens tend to be fairly mild in psychedelic terms.

I've taken so much 2c-b that I couldn't see my environment very well at all, but the visuals weren't exactly minblowingly complex and it wasn't 'particularly' intense (comparatively speaking).

2c-i and 2c-d are relatively similar to 2c-b in terms of visuals/depth of experience. They are certainly visual but there are more psychedelic 2C's which I'd expect to take the title. From what I've read, 2C-T-4 isn't particularly visual either, nor is 2C-C. I can't remember about 2c-t-2.

From what I've read, 2c-e ot 2c-t-7 will take the crown.

In particular I seem to remember reading trip reports that 2c-t-7 is incredibly visual.

EDIT: Do you mean just out of 2c-b, 2c-d, or 2c-i? I'd say they're all relatively the same, and it's going to come down to dose. None of them are particularly visual chemicals.

 

[Solipsis]

From what I've read, 2c-e ot 2c-t-7 will take the crown.

In particular I seem to remember reading trip reports that 2c-t-7 is incredibly visual.

I think thats spot on..

Also I hear 2C-P can be strongly visual, no surprise there perhaps as it is structurally somewhere in between 2C-E and 2C-T-7 in a sense.

This thread might be for you:
the most visual psychedelic thread

Visuals can be pretty damn mindblowing, but I think it is a little myopic to focus too much on the visuals. Many people are of course very visually oriented, and when you tell or imagine what happens in a trip it is usually movie like, but mentally - behind the screens - also a lot can happen that works synergistic with visuals.

 

[moe.ron]

Of the 2c-x phenthylamines I have tried, 2c-p was by far the most visual. 2C-T-2 and 2c-e were probably similar in terms of visual intensity and complexity. 2c-i was visual but the visuals were never very complex. DOx and nbome are highly visual and complex IME, but while DOx can be a "full" psychedelic in lack of a better term, nbome is all visual with a euphoric push, and hardly any mental effects to speak of.

 

[Kl519]

2C-P @ 15mg is very visual for sure, ime at least. Whether they are oev or cev, it's pretty strong though it is a bit weird to have cevs while getting stuck in a neutral thought loop.

I'm one of those who are very visually oriented because my actual vision is erratic. My left eye is a -1.75 but my right eye is a -4.75, so without contacts/lenses I can't see shit in detail past a couple yards unless I just leave my left eye open, heh. I get free visuals without them, and they increase exponentially on psychs/stims.

I think one of the most enjoyable occurrences from taking psychs is when I can see clearly without corrective lenses. It's an incredible phenomenon imo, just like time dilation. The latter feels like your life is getting extended.

But anyway, I heard recently that 2C-B is very visual at the right dose too. It can also be a bit disorienting from what I've seen. 2C-I is also visual, color and pattern wise, while 2C-P's is of a different nature. In the darkness is where its visuals are most prominent, ironically. I've read that it is similar to 2C-E, which is what intrigued me about it but I haven't tried it.