• Trip Reports Moderator: M!$ter-ED

**** We Are Back! Spotlight Substance for April: 2C-P

F&B...which is more potent....DOM or 2C-P? Which do youprefer? I can't believe I've been sitting on 2C-P for so long now. It sounds SOOOOOO wonderful.
 
This is yet another compound that I have absolutely no interest in trying. It lasts way too long and sounds like more of a commitment than LSD for less benefit.
 
morninggloryseed said:
F&B...which is more potent....DOM or 2C-P? Which do youprefer? I can't believe I've been sitting on 2C-P for so long now. It sounds SOOOOOO wonderful.
Click to expand...


Difficult question because they are quite different in their subjective effects. Both tend to 'draw you in', but DOM does so with a manic energy whereaas 2C-P doesn't quite have the manic edge (but does have some physical discomfort associated). I'd probably say DOM is the most potent as 5mg of DOM will fairly sweep you away whereas 5mg of 2C-P is still a lowish dose
 
The only reason i won't try 2C-P is because i heard that there's a very fine line between tripping and ODing. The "safety threshold" is very small so it's too dangerous, to me atleast, to take. For something like this you'd need a scale with an error rate of +/- 0.01mg just to be safe.

But hey that's just me.
 
I don't think a .01mg precision scale would be necessary at all. Granted I would not try to measure an individual dose with a +-1mg sensitivity scale. I'd measure a larger amount, say 100mg, on such a scale, giving a range of 99-101mg or even 98-102 to give some leeway. Then use liquid measurement... dissolve it into an equal number of milliliters of distilled water/alcohol mix (100ml to 100mg). Since milliliters can be measured easily with great precision, you'll end up with a solution where 1mL = .98 to 1.02mg. Being off by a couple of hundredths of a milligram is not going to push you across the line from recreational to overdose and is a very reasonable amount of variance to be working with. :)
 
not one I'm interested in trying (tried b, want to try d and maybe some of the CT's)

edit: oh, anyway, what's up for May?
 
something really obscure that none of us have ever tried and certainly can't get a hold of ;)
 
euphoricnod said:
something really obscure that none of us have ever tried and certainly can't get a hold of ;)
Click to expand...

Kryptonite!

& as for 2CP - compared to DOM - hmm I'd probably take the DOM but wouldn't give back my 2CP experience in exchange. The visuals were at times extreme & so was the bodyload (tinnitus was really bad :| ) - some of the time, for several hours really, a disoriented kind of confusion reigned interspersed with a few minutes lucidity now & then.
One odd thing was that the missus was unable to walk after 30 minutes ( due to intensity) whereas I was out playing football until a good 2 hours after ingestion. The timeline seemed markedly different for the two of us.She is however extremely sensitive to PEAs. Whereas I'm very insensitive ( generally ;) )

It was intense. 8o

10mgs 2CP = more mgs 2CE than I've taken for sure. :)

Then again I haven't gone over 18mgs 2CE as I recall anyway.
 
Last edited:
It has been a long time since I've had 2c-p. 12mg was enough for a strong trip, similar to about twice that amount of 2c-e. The effects are very similar, with 2c-p being more potent and longer lasting. There was a really nice body high with it and it was more euphoric than 2c-e.

I've taken it up to 16mg+more over the following hours with no problems other than a trip that lasted too long and some nausea. Possibly a bit of overheating, but it was summer in Texas and I was outside at times.

I'd love to get my hands on some more.
 
For me, 2C-E has probaply been the best psychedelic I ever did, out of nearly 2 dozen different phenethylamines and tryptamines. It sounds like 2C-P would be even better, though very hard to aquire as well. Which 4-substituted 2,5-dimethoyxyphenethylamine is it by the way?
 
Beenhead said:
I never really understood hypnotic in the sense of drugs too well, does it mean sedating, zonked out [...]
Click to expand...

I remember reading that, too (Shulgin) and wondered if it literally increased suggestability so notably that it needed specific mention in the literature.

For those who use psychedelics as belief creation/change tools, would that not be the trumpeting of an angel?

Edit (after readin entire thread it would appear to be that this is not the case?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top