US - State says it will use a new, single drug for upcoming execution

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
US - State says it will use a new, single drug for upcoming execution

State officials unexpectedly said in court today that they’ve found a way around a shortage of a drug used for lethal injections for death-row inmates, saying they’re prepared to use a single drug for a scheduled Feb. 13 execution.

A nationwide shortage of one of the three drugs used for executions has led to a delay in some death sentences in various states. However, Texas first used the single-drug method in July; Georgia and Kentucky in the past week cleared the way to use similar alternatives to the trio of drugs.



Today’s revelation came in U.S. District Court in Baton Rouge in a case involving death-row inmate Christopher Sepulvado. He wants his Feb. 13 execution date thrown out so he can challenge the state’s lethal-injection process. As in cases in other states, his attorney says the three-drug mixture could be cruel and unusual punishment, violating his Constitutional rights.

During a status conference with Judge James J. Brady Tuesday, Sepulvado’s lawyer argued that he should be able to join an ongoing lawsuit accusing the state of not providing basic information about the three-drug injection process.

A Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections representative told the court that the state intends to use only one drug — pentobarbital — for future executions, Michael Rubenstein, a lawyer at the status conference, told The Lens.

Previously, the state used sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride. But a nationwide shortage of sodium thiopental made lawyers question how the state planned on executing inmates.

Still, the change announced today doesn’t affect the questions at hand, Rubenstein said in an email after the hearing.

“Even though the Department of Corrections has today disclosed that they intend to use pentobarbital as the single drug [for] future executions, the State continues to refuse to provide basic information about how it intends to execute Louisiana citizens, such as whether any medical authorities were consulted regarding the incorporation of a new drug; the source of the new drug; or the training of personnel who will implement the new procedure for the first time,” he wrote.

The Corrections representative who appeared in court did not have a state-issued written procedure of how to administer the drug for the first time, Rubenstein said.

Corrections officials declined to comment on the matter, saying a news release would be issued Wednesday.

Rubenstein had previously argued that the state’s lack of current protocol poses risk for inmates to experience “excruciating pain,” and therefore violates Eighth Amendment rights, according to a complaint filed in Federal Court.

“There is only one pharmaceutical company that makes pentobarbital that has been approved for use in this country, and that company has made the drug unavailable for departments of corrections to use in executions,” Rubenstein said.

“For this reason, it is imperative that the Louisiana DOC be forthright … about where it got the pentobarbital it plans to use and whether it is an FDA-approved product.”

Sepulvado, 69, of DeSoto Parish, was convicted in 1993 for the 1992 murder of his 6-year-old stepson, Wesley Allen Mercer. Various court documents outline the boy’s death in gruesome detail, describing how he was beaten with a screwdriver and his body immersed into a tub of scalding water, causing significant burns and, ultimately, death.

In the 20 years since Sepulvado has been convicted, the state’s lethal injection procedures have changed.

Gary P. Clements, Sepulvado’s attorney, said his client has a right to know about the changes.

Clements is scheduled to appear on Friday for a hearing for another lawsuit – this one in civil court against the Department of Corrections – concerning Sepulvado’s rights when it comes to public records about the lethal injection procedure.

The state’s refusal to hand over detailed written procedure to Clements violates the state open-records law, according to a lawsuit he filed Jan. 15 with the 19th Judicial District Court.

“It’s a Louisiana constitutional right for anyone to have a right to go and find out these things,” Clements said. “There is no legal basis for them to deny us and not turn them over.”

Clements had been seeking access to procedural documents since Dec. 18, six days after a warrant for Sepulvado’s execution was signed, including information about the company and origin of the drugs used for execution.

The lawsuit says that the public-records request was not answered until Jan. 8, and a “large majority” of the records had been denied.

Baton Rouge Attorney Jacqueline B. Wilson outlined responses to Clements’ records request in a six-page letter on behalf of the Corrections Department.

At the end of January, after several appeals for his client had been denied, Clements asked to join Sepulvado’s federal complaint with that of death row inmate Jessie Hoffman, of St. Tammany Parish. That lawsuit also seeks to understand how the lethal-injection procedure will be carried out, and with what drugs.

Today’s hearing in federal court was regarding the possible merger of the two complaints.

By the end of the meeting in court, Brady had discussed the possibility of a full hearing on lethal injection in Louisiana, Clements told the Lens. A date for the potential hearing has not been set.

Rubenstein, who represents Hoffman, said he expects the judge to make a decision about how to proceed after the Friday hearing in Civil Court.

If the judge agrees to allow Sepulvado to file suit with Hoffman during the hearing, then Sepulvado’s execution date could get postponed.

Hoffman’s execution date is not yet set.

Hoffman, 34, was convicted of kidnapping, raping and shooting Mary “Molly” Elliot, 28, of Covington, in 1996.

In addition to Rubenstein, Hoffman is represented by New Orleans attorney Cecelia Trenticosta Kappel.

http://thelensnola.org/2013/02/05/state-says-it-will-use-a-new-single-drug-for-upcoming-execution/
 
I've heard of others starting to do the same thing recently. Also I remember reading a few years back about Ohio using hydromorphone or hydromorphone with midazolam for executions. I recall one thing saying they would use 40mg of hydromorphone. To someone with a decent tolerance, that wouldn't even be lethal.
 
By the time you got strapped into the gurney and given those 40mgs, any tolerance you may have had will be long gone. With zero tolerance I bet 40mgs of dilaudid will not be very enjoyable.
 
are death row prisoners even able to build up tolerance to hydromorphone? Is there heroin on death row?

These merciful executions serve no purpose whatsoever. Nobody abstains from a crime because they may be given a lethal dose of pentobarbital many years later. And with all the legal fees for multiple appeals, it's cheaper to incarcerate people for life.

I don't even think a firing squad right after being caught would deter me from a crime.

Execution by elephant is a different story.
 
These merciful executions serve no purpose whatsoever. Nobody abstains from a crime because they may be given a lethal dose of pentobarbital many years later. And with all the legal fees for multiple appeals, it's cheaper to incarcerate people for life.

Many Americans feel the principle purpose of the criminal-justice system is retribution, and they want blood for certain crimes. We can't really dissuade them from that belief through rationality.
 
Many Americans feel the principle purpose of the criminal-justice system is retribution, and they want blood for certain crimes. We can't really dissuade them from that belief through rationality.

We'll be a much more functional nation when we routinely make policy by asking, "What does the science say?"

Many Americans also believe in the existence of angels. 77%! But we don't incorporate the archangel Michael into our military strategies.
 
I don't understand why this is such a big fuss... I could probably list a dozen different substances right now that would work perfectly...

Fuckin' bureaucracy. The number one cause of death on California's death row is old age - just an interesting fact.
 
how much does a 9mm round cost?

how much is a lethal dose of heroin?

how much is a dose of this single drug pharma death wonder?
 
Couldn't they just use a lethal dose of apap and aspirin combined to do the trick? Something like a 10g dose of apap and a 10g dose of aspirin injected would be lethal would it not?

I am sure this will be considered cruel and inhumane, but really now, isn't that just splitting hairs. Either way, you're intention is to kill the individual. How is killing someone humane no matter how it's done?
 
^if you're gonna torture him to death, why not just go for anal impalement on a stake in the busiest part of the state's most populated city?
 
By the time you got strapped into the gurney and given those 40mgs, any tolerance you may have had will be long gone. With zero tolerance I bet 40mgs of dilaudid will not be very enjoyable.

why wouldnt it be enjoyable? its gonna release a shit ton of endorphins before it kills you

just cuz the end result is death doesnt change the fact that IV hydromorphone is gonna fuckin rock
 
thats only if its only barely a lethal dose or even a non lethal dose

if they gave em an enormous dose lethal for any no matter the tolerance chances are you wouldnt be goin through any of that, you'd feel the rush then fall out after the shot n thats it
 
thats only if its only barely a lethal dose or even a non lethal dose

if they gave em an enormous dose lethal for any no matter the tolerance chances are you wouldnt be goin through any of that, you'd feel the rush then fall out after the shot n thats it

What if they were able to use heroin on death row, and had a big enough tolerance for it to be a slow and painful way out as described above?

Of course they could just have another even larger dosage ready to administer if that were to happen, so that's probably what they would do if needed.

I wouldn't want to die from an opiate overdose.
 
how much is a dose of this single drug pharma death wonder?

A 9mm round cost about 15 cents.
A lethal dose of heroin cost about $15 because heroin is really cheap.
A lethal dose of pentobarbital costs about $150, and the lethal dose is about 15 grams.

Funny how the number 15 fits in perfectly with these three things ;)
 
^No way, pentobarbital isn't that expensive

Its a humane way to kill someone, though, probably better than through opiate/oid overdose.

And I doubt anyone would experience asphyxiation at all if the dose was right.

I believe one can be killed humanely, that's not to say that killing itself is necessarily humane. Once we get by the fact that the person will be killed, we can do it in the most comfortable way possible. The act of the killing itself is the punishment, not pain that goes into it. People need to get this straight. No law out forth by a relatively advanced country ("the west", australia, etc) is officially meant to torture, even the draconian ones, and this can be fought in court assuming you have a decent lawyer.

These merciful executions serve no purpose whatsoever. Nobody abstains from a crime because they may be given a lethal dose of pentobarbital many years later. And with all the legal fees for multiple appeals, it's cheaper to incarcerate people for life.

Death itself when one doesn't want to die is definitely punishment enough IMO.
 
^No way, pentobarbital isn't that expensive

Indeed it is. It isn't manufactured in huge pharmaceutical quantities any more, due to being phased out of human medical use. It's still used for veterinary purposes, particularly anesthesia and euthanasia.

It isn't expensive to produce, that's a given. But it's expensive to procure because of the nature of regulations surrounding it's use. It's certainly well within the realm of possibility that a lethal dose (approximately 12 grams orally or 6 grams intravenously) would be even more expensive than $150. No joke about it. It's about regulations, much more so than about cost of production which is essentially dirt cheap to produce.

Heroin is dirt cheap to produce as well...but it's expensive. Why? We all know the answer to that one.
 
Death itself when one doesn't want to die is definitely punishment enough IMO.

Since rehabilitation is out of the question here, do you think that the death penalty should serve primarily to punish, or to deter future crimes?

Do you see an irony in the term "capital punishment"?

I don't mean these to be rhetorical questions.
 
Make this shit so fucking complicated, Christ.........

If I were on death row my number one way to go would be a double barrel shotgun to the face

Second would be a massive, massive opiate OD, and those who say it'd be pleasurable dont know what they're talking about
 
Top