• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Updated Forum Guidelines - Have a read

Sadie

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
13,059
Location
At home in my nook
Hi there,

There have been some updated bits in our guidelines. They are well worth taking note of. Yes, I do know it's a meaty read but you really need to have a look. These could affect you. It's well worth a gander.

There have been some significant changes in the guidelines. See what the do's and don'ts are of EADD please.

Looky HERE
 
I bought some anal beads from shortys strap ons for 69p each, have you found them cheaper anywhere else? I usually need around 69 for a good buzz, and funds are low until payday.
 
Just to add that some considerable time and effort has been spent on updating and amending the EADD Forum Guidelines and I would strongly advise everybody to have a read through. Aside from some changes to some aspects of posting that is and is not liable to receive mod attention, there is also clarification of a number of longstanding concerns which we hope will help to avoid the inconsistencies that have been a problem previously. In one way or another these changes will affect just about everybody and the intention is very much of positive change, greater clarity and transparency so please do have a looksee for yourself and feel free to ask any questions here.
 
First amended rules... You really need to read them all...

RULE 1: NO SOURCES

DO NOT post or private message another member in any way that could be construed as giving or requesting a source for drugs.

The requesting or advertising classic illicit drugs is fairly, here are some examples of sourcing in regards to research chemicals and over the counter pharmaceuticals, whether that be from a high street or online store.


Sourcing:
Has anyone tried the new Sonata XL 2 mg. pellets which Strap-on Shorty's site are selling as a substitute for Etizolam? What did you think of them?
Naming a specific vendor is sourcing, irrespective of the legal status of the product.

Sourcing:
Has anyone tried the new Sonata XL 2 mg. pellets? What did you think of them?
Naming specific brand names which are used by only a single active vendor, is still sourcing.

Sourcing:
I bought some pellets with a big musical-sounding name from an online distributor that sounds like sandals for somebody who is not very tall. Are they any good?
Being sly and evasive doesn't make it O.K. In fact, it makes you look as though you are up to no good, and you know it. On the other hand, it might very well simply go whoosh so far over people's heads that nobody has a clue what you are even on about. Either way, it's not clever.

Not sourcing:
Has anyone tried bromphenzolam (C17H15N4BrS), also known by a variety of vendor-specific brand names, which is being touted as an etizolam replacement?
As long as there is more than one distributor of the product, you haven't actually named anyone; since Strap-on Shorty thinks you're talking about Test Tube Heaven, and vice versa.

All of the above may be subject to revision in the light of forthcoming changes to the law in the UK and other countries.


Such threads will be judged on a case-by-case basis, and will be closed as soon as either a satisfactory answer is given, or it becomes apparent that no such answer will be forthcoming. If you have something valuable to add to a thread that has already been closed, contact a mod by PM, and we'll see what we can do.

Pricing
We allow reasonable discussion of prices of small quantities of drugs, within context. Small amounts, unless otherwise stated, being defined as no more than you could reasonably afford to lose. Bulk pricing is not allowed.

DO NOT ask someone to private message or email you information about sources. This includes online or offline suppliers of illegal AND legal drugs, so research chemicals/salvia/pharmaceuticals etc. all fall under this rule. This is a board-wide rule (please familiarise yourself with the Bluelight User Agreement) and not specific to this forum. Any posts containing sources or requests for sources will be deleted immediately, without warning. Anyone overtly or covertly dealing on Bluelight may have their account deleted or suspended indefinitely.

Discussing sources for harm reduction products is allowed in this forum, providing the product does not have recreational value. Harm reduction products include: things people use in an attempt to minimize negative effects (5-HTP), determine the dosage they are about to consume (scales, syringes), estimate the contents of the drug (EZ-Test kits), consume the drug more safely (clean needles) and emergency related items (Narcon). Although sources for these products are allowed, it is your responsibility to ensure that the site you are linking to does not sell substances that would be otherwise regarded as legal or illegal drugs.
 
RULE 2: NO FLAMING OR HARASSMENT
Eadd is a community. Each of us has a responsibility towards that community. We intend to treat you as adults. All we ask in return is that you act like adults.

If somebody says something "in public" that you think is slightly offensive, your first line of recourse should be to call them out on it right there. Maybe they just made an honest mistake, misjudged how you would react, and will apologise and you can virtually hug and make up. Alternatively, they may be unreasonable and/or unwilling to make amends, maybe it wasn't an honest mistake and they knew how you would react, in this case staff will step and take action.



If somebody says something "in public" that you find really offensive, report it by clicking the little warning triangle icon in the top right hand corner of the post. This will alert the moderation team, who will study the post in question and maybe remove or edit it.

Remember, as a Harm Reduction forum we should be striving to be as inclusive as possible and when personal arguments, personality clashes, and general headbutting spill over into threads it becomes a problem for the whole forum. It reflects badly on EADD and is surely immensely off-putting for newer members or those who are perhaps visiting for the first time looking for information on any given topic. EADD has always been a vibrant forum with members who are free to voice their opinion in any way they see fit. There are limits to what is acceptable though - let's all be keeping it civil please, folks.

Try to be respectful. We all have cranky days, we wouldn't be using an ecstasy information site if we didn't, but please try to put any attitude away before you post. All members have the right to possess (and express) their opinion without fear of judgement - as you would expect them to respect yours.

If you find that you can't communicate constructively with someone, take a step back, make a cup of tea and remind yourself that you're on a website that discusses drug use... and that you probably have more in common with that person than 90% of the population.

Should this fail, DO NOT use the forum as a vehicle to attack the other member in public or hound them across multiple forums. If you have a problem with another member, please resolve your differences amicably via the use of the private messaging function. A little drama is good for the soul, but it eventually drags the forum down.

The board's software also allows you to ignore posts by users that consistently annoy you by adding their username to your ignore list.

Offensive and disruptive posts are not limited to simple overt name calling, racism etc.. Passive aggressive, manipulative and attention seeking behaviour causes equally as much drama, we are not a television soap. We're all human and we don't leave our emotions in another room when we come online, however, only so much can be tolerated before it affects the board as a whole. WE ARE NOT EADDENDERS.
No matter the style of behaviour, if it is repeated, and deemed to have no other intent than to cause hurt and/or disruption then action may be taken.

The first post is explanatory. Even examples are given. The last post has been put into bold text but the entire rule needs to be read!
 
"call them out" guess which resident yank had loads of input in this load of tripe..
 
Offensive and disruptive posts are not limited to simple overt name calling, racism etc.. Passive aggressive, manipulative and attention seeking behaviour causes equally as much drama, we are not a television soap. We're all human and we don't leave our emotions in another room when we come online, however, only so much can be tolerated before it affects the board as a whole. WE ARE NOT EADDENDERS.
No matter the style of behaviour, if it is repeated, and deemed to have no other intent than to cause hurt and/or disruption then action may be taken
.


Oh, no...


People should be able to express themselves and voice their feelings, and if it's going to become so suppressive that you can't do that i'm leaving. I was accused of "attention seeking" recently, after speaking out against another poster who i felt was mis-using the board... so I can see where this one is heading...


I'll probably get infracted for this post now, coz it could go down as "disruptive", "passive aggressive" or even "attention seeking". In fact the former could probably be attributed to any poster on the forum; Wenlock made an example of Sadie and others earlier. We're all gonna break the rules as they are now so broad in definition - so mods will have to pick and choose who they'd like to infract most. This isn't going to work.


(Sorry to be negative and sound all anti-authoritarian, I just fear the new rules give certain mods leverage to infract more freely and that will become negative to the board as a whole)
 
Last edited:
Top