• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

Uncircumsized Penises...how do they differ?

Winsom said:
I respectfully disagree with your comment. I know my body BETTER than any doc out there. I was sterile, had swabs and cutting a peice of skin lesss than 2ml thick was no problem!

I am glad it's gone. Chaos Butterfly, what about you, glad it's gone too ?
Click to expand...

Sorry mate, I wasnt having a go at you..........and I respect that you may well have been very careful etc.............BUT......a lot of people may not be as careful or even regret it should they do it so I think it needs to be said that while your fine with it, its not something that everyone should rush out and do.
 
MazDan said:
^^^^ Actually Winsom........the Frenulum........or that bit of skin you cut away, is very much like the hymen in a woman and for many........but not all guys, it will break during the first major sexual encounter.

So in actual fact what you have done is simply what would have happenned anyways most likely.

Interestingly I have noticed that on some guys it doesnt tear even though they are quite rough with sex.........but most it does.
Click to expand...
No. No. No. I have heard of a few cases (2) of the 'banjo-string' snapping, but it certainly ain't natural (neither for that matter is circumcision). I don't know, maybe us Brits jsut aren't too hot on mutilating our genitals. I seem to remember a few urban legends of banjo-string incidents, the conclusion of which was A+E putting stitiches in. Never known it to happen other than in vague rumour though. OUCH. Fucking hell. I always thought stories of the B-S snapping were like the bogey-man to make us be good little boys....
 
it healed quite nicely. It's my GF's fault, come to think of it, she said "that's not normal" - the things we do for our women !
 
That frenulum stuff had me just about pissing myself..
but thinking about it now, i think i broke an ex bf once!!! I remember him bleeding and needing some cream to sort it out !!
 
So I was listening to the radio the other day, and I hear about this dick trick that only un-circumcized male entertainers can perform.

It's called the "Water Balloon". Supposedly they just pinch the hood shut, then stretch it out so there's a bit of space. At this point, they actually pee so that the it fills up the loose bag on the end like a balloon.

Neat huh? Of course, it might be a bit messy when they release the balloon. Well, enjoy the rest of your lunch break.
 
So, if my penis would be more sensitive if I wasn't circumcised, does that mean that I'd orgasm even faster? Would it, say, go from 15 seconds to 10 seconds? And if it made it easier to masturbate, does that mean I'd have to masturbate even more? Sure, it's mutilation, but so what? There's no real functional deficit, I have absolutely no problem jerking off and, once every five or six years, when I have sex, I have no problem briefly inserting myself and instantly orgasming and feeling bad about it.

Beyond that, I don't feel like arguing the health merits or anything else of circumcision. If, by some freak of nature, I ended up with a son, there's no way in hell he wouldn't be circumcised. Of course, though irreligious, I'm a Jew, so that might have something to do with it.

PS: JESUS the guy in the animated gif infinity posted is tiny. Why the hell would you whip that li'l thing out and jerk off for the camera?

PPS: I love my penis. Yay.
 
I just kinda skimmed this....but I had sex with a guy that wasn't circumcized (granted I was really drunk) and I didn't even notice until we were finished. We used a condom and maybe that's why...

but...I had ABSOLUTELY no clue until we were in the hot tub and I was playing with him..and I was like "ohh" Actually turned me on!
 
dude lol the first guy i was with was uncut, and i didnt really know the diff until i got with with my bf who is cut, there is such a big difference. now that i have been with a cut man it is so much better. jsut the thought of uncut disgusts me
 
^^^I only like African bitchs. You know the ones that have had their clits all carved up and pussy half sewn shut. Just the thought of a normal healthy and functioning woman disgusts me. 8(
 
Actually, the proper analogy would be preferring women with their clitoral hood removed, which, were it common practice, probably wouldn't be such an odd preference. Clitorectomy would be comparable to cutting the whole penis off, and there's no real analogy to sewing the vagina closed.

Hood removal has no impact on functioning, and quite likely might make it EASIER for women to achieve orgasm, and, frankly, I'm not all that opposed to modifications performed on women that makes it easier for them to orgasm.

Out of curiosity, what function can men with foreskins perform that men without can't?
 
Meatal stenosis- is the narrowing of the urinary opening as a result of ulcerations at the opening, which are made possible by the removal of the protective foreskin. The ulcerations can cause considerable discomfort to the baby, and serious stenosis may require surgery to reopen the meatus.

Non Specific Urethritis-since the opening to the urethra is exposed by the removal of the foreskin, it is easier for irritating chemicals, such as soap, to get to the sensitive urethra, causing pain. This affects males and females of all ages, but circumcision makes it worse for males.

Excessive Tightness- It affects the sexual enjoyment of both men and women. Some men with this condition suffer from bent erections. Some men circumcised too tightly report painful erections and painful intercourse with bleeding from the scar site or tears elsewhere. Women complain of painful intercourse due to what they interpret as insufficient lubrication.
 
MaliceNwunderland said:
Meatal stenosis- is the narrowing of the urinary opening as a result of ulcerations at the opening, which are made possible by the removal of the protective foreskin. The ulcerations can cause considerable discomfort to the baby, and serious stenosis may require surgery to reopen the meatus.

Non Specific Urethritis-since the opening to the urethra is exposed by the removal of the foreskin, it is easier for irritating chemicals, such as soap, to get to the sensitive urethra, causing pain. This affects males and females of all ages, but circumcision makes it worse for males.

Excessive Tightness- It affects the sexual enjoyment of both men and women. Some men with this condition suffer from bent erections. Some men circumcised too tightly report painful erections and painful intercourse with bleeding from the scar site or tears elsewhere. Women complain of painful intercourse due to what they interpret as insufficient lubrication.
Click to expand...

Umm, those are complications, ALL THREE OF WHICH can occur in men who aren't circumcised and don't necessarily occur in men who are circumcised. None, by the way, are functions. Do we want to get into problems that are more common in uncircumcised men than circumcised men? I don't. I'm not trying to convince anyone to circumcise their children.

This shouldn't a comparison of relatively rare complications and disease rates, it should be a comparison based on cultural and, frankly, aesthetic, rationale. If you like circumcised penises, have your son circumcised. If you don't, don't. If you don't want to give blowjobs to guys with foreskins, don't. If you don't want to have sex with guys without foreskins, don't.

But don't tell parents what they can and can do with their sons without very good reason. And don't make medical arguments about something unless you're willing to look at both sides of the issue.
 
My brother had his frenulum torn. Got cream and everything

I think tight foreskins run in my family, I can barely pull back when erect, and even then, it feels like it's about to tear.

Anybody know how I could maybe loosen it up? I've been trying to stretch it for the last year or so, with no luck. (I don't want any tips to include razor blades :p)
 
Anarchofascist said:
Umm, those are complications, ALL THREE OF WHICH can occur in men who aren't circumcised and don't necessarily occur in men who are circumcised. None, by the way, are functions. Do we want to get into problems that are more common in uncircumcised men than circumcised men? I don't. I'm not trying to convince anyone to circumcise their children.

This shouldn't a comparison of relatively rare complications and disease rates, it should be a comparison based on cultural and, frankly, aesthetic, rationale. If you like circumcised penises, have your son circumcised. If you don't, don't. If you don't want to give blowjobs to guys with foreskins, don't. If you don't want to have sex with guys without foreskins, don't.

But don't tell parents what they can and can do with their sons without very good reason. And don't make medical arguments about something unless you're willing to look at both sides of the issue.
Click to expand...

You read that and couldn't find the functions of the foreskin? It has a pupose. Better natural lube and keeps stuff out of yer pee hole better. You're correct, some of this stuff can happen to uncut dudes, it just doesn't as much. The flip side being that uncut dudes are at a much higer risk of penile cancer and other shit. I know both sides of the issue.

I'm not intrested in aesthics because I have no need or want of a penis outside the one attached to my body. I'm not giving medical advice and besides nobody should make a decision about circumcision based on what they read in this thread. That's a personal choice and I really don't advoate either way. You wanted to know the functions of the foreskin and I also just thought it was strange people could be disgusted by natural human anatomy.

P.S. I would have no problem having sex with an African chick that had recieved some various form of "female circucision", but I don't think I could ever say that women that had not been altered were disgusting. (I also don't see how some of the more brutal forms are beneficial at all.)
 
Last edited:
im uncut and live in the US... ive actualy never had a girl say anything about it... and i really dontcare... f my GF came up to me and said she had a problem with it and was serious id probably laugh or ask her to cut part of her ear off if i did it... seeing how parts of your ear have no use aswell
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top