ULDN - The magic weapon to reduce and keep tolerance to Opioids low

[Hexenstahl]

How does one legally control a ligand that if administered alone has no activity?

The legislative normally handles such things by creating the legal fiction that the possessor of one of these ligands also has the other ligand and intends to administer them both, which gives government the pretext to regulate the substance in question accordingly. It is the same principle that is used on drug/explosives precursors. The government simply assumes that you intend to manufacture something like a C4 landmine when they catch you possessing conc. H2SO4. They don't care that it is a million times more likely that I am actually using sulphuric acid to drop the pH of my fruit mash down to 2.8 - 3.3 (trust me, it's extremely economical to do it this way), because the fiction says that conc. H2SO4 is used by non-licensed, private persons for something illegal and nefarious.

For those who are unaware: the word "fiction" in law is not to be confused with fiction as it is used in our everyday, non-legal language. The latter describes something imaginary, the former however is a non-rebuttable presumption that is either affirmative or disaffirmative of falsehood. It was invented to create useful concepts such as legal persons (corporations), but unfortunately it can and is often abused by our governments to create absurd realities that you can't even rebut in court.

 

[vima]

Now I'm even more confused. Your body is reacting in such an erratic way to NTX. Withdrawals while having no NTX in your system?! I think at this point the scientists over at the LDN research trust might be immensely interested in you as a test subject lol. They have the knowledge and the means to actually conduct research on you. A frankenstein neurobiology such as yours could give us tremendous insight into how (U)LDN and opioids interact with one another.

right??? seems super weird; i truly don't get it. and shit, if you can make the intros, i'd love to talk to those scientists.

P.S.: if they end up asking you to sign a waiver, pls turn around by 180° and LEAVE. If they end up asking you to sign a waiver and don't even offer you compensation for potential damages, pls turn around by 180° and leave even faster. The medical industry only ever asks you to sign waivers if the responsible parties have knowledge of the odds being stacked against you to an overwhelming degree. Even if they do not end up asking you to sign a waiver, you can very easily test how honest the responsible parties really are with you when they say that it's "totally safe", simply by giving them a notice of liability. If they still wanna do "business" with you, then that's a sign that they are actually certain about the safety of their procedures. If however they end up rescinding their offer...well, I don't think I need to explain why they would do that.

If you ever end up being asked to partake in a study, send me a PM and I'll write you a notice of liability (free of charge ofc).

also, LOL!! thank you very much for the sincere offer of support, and your description was really funny.

gosh, i love this site. i can't believe i lurked for so many years before posting. it sure is a whole new worlllldddd *insert aladdin song*