Chomsky ftw 


I like how people think the £20 for an ecto in the 80's meant you were getting £20 worth of ecto as opposed to now. It was simply a case of no-one had heard of the stuff & it was amazing so they could charge what they want. I bet the mark-up was off the scale on those £20 pills at some point in the supply chain, until someone else thought "hold up, this cunt is paying £2 & selling for £20, I'll pay £2 & sell for £10 but sell ten times as much"
Then you've got the lab churning out 10,000 pills at a time, once there's enough demand they ramp the production up to 100,000 or 1,000,000 at a time & the individual unit cost drops dramatically.
Economics & shit init like blud yagetme?

...but anyway, MDMA was being made with safrole when I was buying eckies for £1.
dee dee that is just plain not how chemistry works, you don't seem to give a shit though. your analogy is worthless.
Chomsky ftw![]()
This thread made me want to start a separate thread debating "the war on drugs". Propaganda, Political position, sustainability, failure and the use of mass media. I didn't though as I couldn't be asked and it looks a bit conspiracy theory.
we've already been over my use of the word asked in that phrase.
yes you're right the thread is supposed to be about war on drugs/economics about ALL drugs!ditto. maybe these weren't grans minestrone either.
i concur. to back this up in more scientific terms:
please, dee dee, look at the definition of a potential energy surface (the best description of a molecule for a wide variety of applications) and tell me where the provenance of the ingredients come into play. its nuclear and electronic degrees of freedom, positions and electrostatic interactions.
i'm yet again incredibly confused about what this thread is supposed to be about. too much mulled wine i guess. enjoyed reading the actual war on drugs/economics bits though.
& been over the fact that it is incorrect.