edgarshade
Bluelighter
Battleofideas
25 Nov 2011
http://youtu.be/w7hxqFbX4j4
25 Nov 2011
http://youtu.be/w7hxqFbX4j4
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick, GP; author, The Tyranny of Health: doctors and the regulation of lifestyle and Defeating Austism: a damaging delusion
Roger Howard, chief executive, UK Drug Policy Commission
Professor Neil McKeganey, director, Centre for Drug Misuse Research
Chair: Suzy Dean, freelance journalist; co-founder, IoI Current Affairs Forum
Politicians making the case for prohibiting certain drugs usually argue they are harmful, while those against insist it should be a personal choice, and that prohibition creates additional risks for drug users. But some believe that even if the harms are exaggerated, there is a moral case against drug use. They insist there is a difference between taking drugs to fight disease or alleviate pain, and taking them for pleasure, or to achieve 'artificial' highs, arguing the latter is less acceptable. Considered morally rather than medically, is there anything wrong with seeking altered states of consciousness?
