HerrSchnaufer
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 171
Telegraph, By David Millward, Transport Editor 7:00AM GMT 14 Jan 2011
Full article here ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/8258043/Motorists-face-drug-testing-within-months.html
Continues at the above link.
Raises some worrying questions though, especially for daily drug users.
Yay. That's not fraught with all kinds of issues ...
Cannabis users should worry as to whether the machines will be testing for 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC or 11-hydroxy-THC specifically, at what levels those will be set, whether tolerance will be considered ...
Opiate users really have to worry about tolerance here. Presumably to catch everyone, levels will be set as if an inexperienced user with no tolerance had consumed the substance. So what about daily opiate users with huge tolerance?
Their single keep-cravings-at-bay hit would be enough to kill that user with no tolerance, but them driving without their shot would be far more dangerous than driving with it.
Just a flawed piece of legislation which discriminates further against drug users.
Full article here ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/8258043/Motorists-face-drug-testing-within-months.html
The Home Office is ready to approve devices which will be used to screen motorists suspected of driving under the influence of illegal narcotics.
In a new move manufacturers will be sent details of the Government's requirements for the machines today.
The use of so-called "drugalysers" in police stations will also pave the way for roadside testing by the end of next year.
It is understood that the first devices, capable of testing for an array of drugs including amphetamines, cannabis and ecstasy, could be in police stations by the summer ...
Continues at the above link.
Raises some worrying questions though, especially for daily drug users.
- Well, that's not an option which is just screaming to be abused now is it? Sure, seems like a good idea, in principle, but the power to stop and search seemed like a good idea in principle, until we all saw how widely it's abused by police.The use of so-called "drugalysers" in police stations will also pave the way for roadside testing by the end of next year.
Even with streamlined testing, the prosecution still has to prove that the presence of the drug impaired the motorist's driving. This means the law on drug driving is currently in the same position as that governing alcohol before the introduction of the breathalyser in 1967.
However Sir Peter North has called for the creation of a new offence which would make it illegal to drive with the presence of an illegal drug in the bloodstream.
Yay. That's not fraught with all kinds of issues ...
Cannabis users should worry as to whether the machines will be testing for 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC or 11-hydroxy-THC specifically, at what levels those will be set, whether tolerance will be considered ...
Opiate users really have to worry about tolerance here. Presumably to catch everyone, levels will be set as if an inexperienced user with no tolerance had consumed the substance. So what about daily opiate users with huge tolerance?
Their single keep-cravings-at-bay hit would be enough to kill that user with no tolerance, but them driving without their shot would be far more dangerous than driving with it.
Just a flawed piece of legislation which discriminates further against drug users.
