edgarshade
Bluelighter
Harwick News
Published on Wednesday 7 December 2011 15:33
With reader comments
http://www.hawick-news.co.uk/news/l...nnabis_has_no_intention_of_stopping_1_1993536
Comments...
Published on Wednesday 7 December 2011 15:33
With reader comments
http://www.hawick-news.co.uk/news/l...nnabis_has_no_intention_of_stopping_1_1993536
A MAN caught growing cannabis claimed the illegal drug helped alleviate a medical condition. Mark Makin said he had no intention of stopping using the class B drug, and producing it himself meant he didn’t have to buy it on the street. Makin, 43, of Dovemount Place, admitted having cannabis and producing the drug at his home on September 2.
“His medical condition is relieved by taking cannabis,” explained defence solicitor Matt Patrick, “and that was the motivation behind him growing these plants. “It also meant he was not having to move in circles he would have had to, to obtain it on the street,” he added.
Sheriff Donald Corke fined Makin, a sales assistant, £120, warning him his activity was illegal and would be closely monitored by police. “I know that you feel fully justified in doing this, but it is illegal, and I have to uphold the law,” he told the accused. “Because you have indicated you don’t intend to stop, you should be aware that the police will be keeping a close eye on you,” he added.
Comments...
WinstonMatthews
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 05:18 PM
How is the act of stopping Mr Mark Makin from growing his own cannabis going to help anyone? and putting in the papers for self medicating is diabolical. Cannabis is a recognised medicine world wide, including the UK. Where a pharmaceutical form is available in a spray, at a very expensive cost, and not to all ailments that it is good for. So who is the law suiting? No one and time to let the punishment suit the so called offense! Self medication with a plant safer than peanuts isn't much of an crime against anyone, not even a victim! In fact there is a benefit to this scenario , the gentleman in question is aiding his health. And not costing the wealth of the NHS directly, surely the merits of this must be brought into this case!

