UK - Legalising drugs would bring not freedom but enslavement

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Guardian

Kathy Gyngell for ConservativeHome, part of the Guardian Comment Network
Thursday 20 February 2014 17.19 GMT

With reader comments
From the relentless pro-drugs legalisation media blitz of the last few weeks, you would think this was the most pressing item on the government's agenda after the floods. It is not. Who is behind this campaign with a Gantt chart on their wall logging the daily media hits is a question for another day.

My worry is why responsible people are lending their names to this "cause" when they are so obviously ignorant of the facts and the implications. I am not bothered about Russell Brand. His petition demanding a parliamentary debate has become the stuff of comedy, given his earlier public strictures on ignoring democracy. Beyond celebrity groupies and metropolitan admirers, his erratic and self-serving ramblings won't persuade.

No, the people who perturb me are middle-aged political converts to this cause: Nick Clegg, Nigel Farage, Daniel Hannan and Norman Fowler. Whether intentionally or not, they have aligned themselves in a culture war which pits the liberal against traditionalist, cosmopolitan against parochial and old against young. This is what drugs' legalisation is about: a war over fundamental values. It is not a battle about basic freedoms – far from it. Drugs enslave.

More...
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...rug-liberals-side-effects-children-experiment
 
Kathy Gyngell the drug war pits the intelligent, compassionate, and realistic against the idealistic, greedy, and delusional. Have you looked who's on your side.. Drug dealing thugs, Prison Owners, Big Alcohol, Big pharma, Greedy Lawyers, all the greedy companies who benefit from the slave labor they end up getting of drug felons both in prison and once they get out, The violent drug cartels.. Nice company your keeping Kathy Gyngell.. real nice company.
 
^ if drugs were legal, the cartels and dealers would be out of business, and the prison population would decrease by 90%, so where would the slave labor come from?
 
This is even worse than Daily Mail. Straw-manism, statistics without sources, utter falsities, the whole nine yards.
 
He is wrong if he thinks they address and estimate the full costs of legalisation. Quite simply, the data required for a formal cost-benefit analysis is not available.

Very true! But then in the very next paragraph:

Estimates of increased use vary between 75% and 289% after legalisation, more if advertising is permitted.

How can you claim that "the data required ... is not available" for the economics of drug legalization, and then show us these numbers (which also lack any concrete statistical basis)?
 
This is retarded
it does give freedom inslavement is being imprisoned for getting high.
Is any one involved in politics or public speaking just a complete moron?

Also great post never sick.
 
Yeees.... imprisonment is freedom from slavery, brought to you by Britain's ministry of truth, spreading propaganda since 1984
 
Top