UK - Legal highs 'terrify' Glasgow's top cop

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Evening Times

WEDNESDAY 21 NOVEMBER 2012

With reader comments

Strathclyde Chief Constable Campbell Corrigan has revealed the drugs he most worries about.

Not heroin, amphetamines or cocaine: he loses sleep over so-called "legal highs." "They terrify me, they absolutely terrify me," said the force's most senior officer. "There are young people who think these are not really drugs at all, but something between those high-energy drinks and cannabis. "That is absolutely not the case." Strathclyde Police has issued warning after warning about the substances their officers refer to as "new drugs" than as "legal highs". They are talking about supposedly lawful products sold in "head shops" – the name given to premises which sell "legal highs", including Glasgow city centre premises – and on the internet as plant food or incense, but clearly intended by consumption.

Such legal highs include Annihilation, a product sometimes sold in packaging featuring a nuclear mushroom cloud, which was flagged up by the force this month after nine people needed hospital treatment after taking it.

Glasgow has been targeted by those pushing such products – which often, in fact, contain toxic substances or illegal Class A drugs, such as escstasy or cocaine.

Mr Corrigan believes the products are transforming a drugs market previously dominated by big illegal products that were taken by older men and women familiar with their habits.

More...
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/legal-highs-terrify-glasgows-top-cop-107733n.19472723
 
Crowded bottom row of teeth terrify me!

19478981.JPG


Why haven't their moderators approved my comment yet? It took me ages to type it in.
 
Newspaper websites are usually very selective about which comments they allow. Usually they'll put through just enough voices which disagree with their stance, then start blocking the rest and allowing the hardcore supporters to spam up a debate, creating the appearance of a minority of outlying troublemakers who disagree with their stance, which appears to be supported by a firm majority.
"There are young people who think these are not really drugs at all, but something between those high-energy drinks and cannabis. "

I really don't understand this part. How can the young people over there be that ignorant? There was an excuse back in 08/09, but after mephedrone, and MDPV, and the like, how can they possibly think that RC's are so much safer than street drugs?

Although I severely doubt the media is helping. If you tell someone that one dose of a drug will drive them blithering mad and send them running down the street tearing their clothes off and biting pedestrians, then they see other people taking the drug and just plain having a good time, then they're going to write off your opinion as absurd fairly quickly, ignoring the valid side of the warning.
 
Last edited:
Top