rickolasnice
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 6,810
While the CT part of 9/11 might belong in CE&P there is very clearly a role played by TV and media. I'm unsure what wreckage you speak of because right at the start there was pretty much no wreckage and only a hole that could never have accommodated more than the fuselage of the plane, so where are the hardened steel-titanium, high temperature, 6 tonne engines? The TV made sure we all got overdosed on the tiny scrap pieces later on but initial footage and photos showed nothing.
Then you've clearly done your homework using only conspiracy theorist sources and information.
Can't be arsed for a long one.. You seen the damage that the bomber did to the empire state building in the 40's? The hole in the pentagon is exactly the type of damage we would expect to see.. especially when you can see wing damage on the front* (oh that's right the conspiracy websites don't use that photo). There was tonnes of wreckage.. In one shot from above you can see a HUGE pile of aluminium shrapnel..then there were things like landing gear, and i forget what else, fuck it look it up.. which are not only photographed but recorded by almost every eye witness there, a lot of whom were fire fighters. And then there were the witnesses to the FUCKING GREAT PLANE that flew into the side of the building.
NSFW:
about 89 The amount of eye witnesses I gathered who stated they saw an object crash into the Pentagon. The vast majority of the still available ones.
at least 45 The amount of eye witnesses who reported seeing a plane and described it with words like: 'airliner', 'big', 'silver', 'roaring', etc.
at least 23 The amount of eye witnesses who specifically said they saw an American Airlines jet. In all cases a large jet.
at least 22 The amount of witnesses who reported the noise of the plane was very loud to deafening.
at least 17 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a plane running down light poles when crossing the highways.
at least 12 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw and heard the plane increase its throttle at the last seconds.
at least 11 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a C-130H flying 30 seconds behind a jetliner.
at least 5 The amount of eye witnesses who specifically stated they saw the plane had its gear up.
at least 2 The amount of eye witnesses who stated that they saw a small corporate jet, without doing any creative interpretating [sic] of the witness accounts.
at least 0 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a missile. What the person thought he heard isn't relevant!
at least 0 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a military jet fighter at the time of the crash.
at least 0 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a Global Hawk at the time of the crash.
at least 3 The amount of witnesses who reported the sound of the plane was quite noiseless. (One of them acknowledged it was the shock)
at least 1 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw the plane had it's gear down. (Indirect, said a wheel hit a pole)
at least 25 The amount of witnesses who have said something that might point to the use of explosives or incendiaries. (White flash, powerful blast waves which blew people through the air, molten glass, burning aluminium, [sic] spreading debris over hundreds of yards back to where the plane came from, including 2 engines, the missing plane itself, etc.)
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/damage.html
Last edited: