• Welcome Guest

    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
    Fun 💃 Threads Overdosed? Click
    D R U G   C U L T U R E

This thread is for people who dont like weed

ummm wow, ok.
so if you smoked a blunt or took a pill of E, which one would do more damage to your brain?
ive smoked blunts and ive rolled E and i can tell you that by the way i felt the next day physically and mentally, that E was MUCH MUCH MUCH 100x worse.
sigh~ i just keep repeating my comment in different ways over and over again...
 
another thing,
it seems that most of the people on this topic that hate weed, hate it because of the lazy, stupid ass stoners that THEY know. well the lazy stoners that YOU know dont represent every single stoner on the earth. yeah, lots of stoners are lazy fucks, but a lot arent(like so many people have said, it depends on the person), so hate the person or persons that you know, not the drug.
UNLESS weed completely ruined your life or did something horrible to you, then you can hate it all you want! =)
 
Answer my question please, which does less brain damage? a blunt or a pill of E?
plus, that is such a WEAK point because tobacco is not naturally smoked anymore, havent you seen any TRUTH commercials?
 
I guess what really upsets me about the weed smokers is how chill they are....TOO chill. I mean, a comatose person is REALLY DAMN CHILL...but boring as fuck. I won't say that weed smokers can be compared to people in comas, but I cannot help but notice that weed DULLS the intensity and vivacity of so many of those who smoke it. It's really sad to watch people I care about lose so much of what I like about them every time they smoke.
I like PASSION, INTENSITY, and INTELLECTUAL DRIVE. Those are the elements I value most, and the ones I see disappear when someone lights up a joint. And that is fundamentally why I have a deep hatred for weed.
Thanks fairnymph - that entirely sums up how I feel about weed too.
My boyfriend retreats into an impetatrable shell when he's had a few bongs... it's frustrating and damaging to our relationship. It's like sitting in a room with someone who's had a lobotomy.
I think weed - when abused - can be a very selfish drug.
And in fairnymph's defense... Agressive and Rude? :D hahahha. She's a strong woman with opinions, but from what I've seen in SLR she shows more compassion, integrity and insight than any person her age I've ever met.
 
Bonecutter, please expand on why you want to slap people who use the "its natural" argument and why they are fucking dumbasses.
Its also really fucking rude of you to call a bunch of people "fucking dumbasses" just because they have a different opinion than yours. I thought this message board was a place to express your opinions and to hear other people's opinions and have good arguments because of different opinions, not to fucking hate. people like you are making this world decay.
 
people like you are making this world decay.
Wow! Thanks.
Well it's a rediculous arguement. FN already tried to explain this to you and you started ranting off about E, cigarettes, and brain damage so I'm not even gonna try and take a stab at it. You'll continue to believe that if something is "natural" it must be safe and you'll continue to be completely wrong. It's that simple.
 
haha
my argument was never "if its natural its safe"
no drugs are safe! drugs are drugs, period.
my arugment from the start, was that natural
drugs are safer than synthetic drugs, READ.
its ok though, people make mistakes.
[ 16 January 2003: Message edited by: asianfreek ]
 
natural drugs are safer than synthetic drugs
I can tell you will refuse to admit you are wrong, regardless of how I or anyone else tries to convince you, but this statement is simply WRONG. Can you provide me with a single medical/scientific article to back up your view? You simply cannot state things as fact when they are not.
Yes, weed is less dangerous than MDMA, but cigarettes are more dangerous than aspirin...weeeeeeee! So, you see your point is completely invalid.
I can think of HUNDREDS of examples where 'natural' drugs are more dangerous than 'synthetic drugs'.
-Ephedra from the Ma Huang plant is far worse for the body/nervous system than synthetic amphetamine
-GHB is easier on the body (not including risk of OD) than alcohol (naturally occurring)
-LSA (a naturally occurring psychedelic in morning glory seeds) has far more nasty/unpleasant effects than LSD, its synthetic counterpart
I'm sure that you could come up with plenty of natural drugs that are better than synthetic drugs, too. And I'm not saying that some natural drugs aren't better than some synthetic drugs...but one kind of drug isn't better than the other.
Thus, trying to justify weed use as being 'acceptable' because it is 'natural' is totally meaningless as well as plain ignorant.
[ 16 January 2003: Message edited by: fairnymph ]
 
OK OK so it all balances out and we're even, i never said that my OPINION was fact, please dont put words in my mouth, im just arguing for my opinion.
by the way, LSD isnt synthetic, isnt the active ingredient in LSD made from a type of fungus? i learned that in biology...
this argument has been very fun, i like to argue =)
 
you people are all nuts.
you're all arguing about opinions.
who gives a shit what someone else thinks?
the less people that smoke pot, the more there is for me.
and for the record, i was lazy and unmotivated before i was a pot smoker.
 
and for the record, i was lazy and unmotivated before i was a pot smoker.
LMFAO! I think that's why I enjoy smoking pot so much - it gives me an excuse to be lazy :D
I think this dead horse has been well and truly flogged, and it looks like opinions are split. If anyone has anything else to add, then can we try and argue without resorting to calling each other names? Cheers :)
 
Fairnymph:
For those few who think I'm 'aggressive and rude', you obviously don't know me well (check out my work in my forums).I have always felt strongly about a variety of topics and if some people misinterpret that in a solely negative way, then they're missing the point.
I have read your work in your forums, and often I do find you to be 'aggressive and rude' in those as well. I admit I don't know you well, but frankly often you don't act like the kind of person I'd like to get to know well.
Back to the weed, well put it this way, its a drug, like any other drug, and it has its negative side effects and so on, but its far less damaging, both as far as lifestyle is concerned, and as far as immediate health dangers and neurotoxicity are concerned, than many other drugs. I enjoy the odd cone now and then, but it's not a highly regular thing for me. I enjoy it on its own, not really in combination with other drugs, though its custom made for comedown smoking.
So I'm defending weed as a weed atheist here. ;)
-plaz out-
 
If anyone has anything else to add, then can we try and argue without resorting to calling each other names?
Yeah, no shit! Maybe those who are so quick to make unfair (and invalid) assumptions about my personality should just start a whole 'who hates fairnymph the evil bitch?' thread instead of hijacking this thread.
[ 17 January 2003: Message edited by: fairnymph ]
 
Weed sucks.........Some of the psychological addictions to it are very, very annoying if not otherwise crappy.
Also, I'd assume it's the same as alchohol,when you're on it everythings cool and everybody's friends, but if you're sober watching the people, you're just like " My god, what abunch of complete jack asses. "
Burn out stoner chicks anyone?-----> " yeah like........uh.....HAR HAR HAR . "
 
I know that this is a reply to a first page post, but I'll get to the rest later.
Originally posted by randycaver:
in fact i know people who turn down 40K a year jobs and would rather stick to their minimum wage shit positions simply because they DONT WANT TO TAKE A DRUG TEST because they SMOKE POT.

God, I'm glad that I don't live in AmeriKKKa, and I was able to get a 40k+ job without a drug test.
[ 18 January 2003: Message edited by: monstercan-D ]
 
Top