'They've used me as a mule': China seeks death penalty for Australian jockey Anthony

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
'They've used me as a mule': China seeks death penalty for Australian jockey Anthony Bannister

Charges raise prospect of diplomatic confrontation with Beijing similar to that with Jakarta over Bali nine pair.

1428849559510.jpg


Beijing: Chinese prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for an Australian jockey caught in an alleged attempt to smuggle more than three kilograms of crystal methamphetamine into Australia from Guangzhou.

Anthony Roger Bannister, 43, was stopped from boarding his China Southern flight to Sydney on March 11 last year after customs officers detected the drugs, also known as ice, in envelopes stuffed in eight ladies' handbags contained in his luggage.

But Mr Bannister, who showed promise as a young jockey alongside favourites Dwayne Dunn and Jason Holder in Adelaide, has maintained his innocence. He told a Guangzhou court he was unaware of the drugs in his luggage and that he was the victim of an elaborate scam.

1428849559510.jpg


"I do believe that I have been set up ... in this drug smuggling scheme," Mr Bannister, handcuffed and dressed in a pale yellow detention centre uniform, told the court in a trial which was held in October but which has only just come to light. "They've used me as a mule."

Mr Bannister is just one of at least 10 Australians to have been charged in China in the past year with serious drug offences that can attract the death penalty. The charges raise the prospect of an awkward diplomatic confrontation with Beijing similar to the one playing out with Jakarta over the lives of condemned Bali nine drug smugglers Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran.

It is understood that most, if not all, of the Chinese cases involve the trafficking of ice from Guangzhou, highlighting the booming ice trade to Australia from the southern Chinese city, which is favoured by multinational drug syndicates for its international transport links and ready availability of precursor chemicals.
"I do believe that I have been set up ... in this drug smuggling scheme": Anthony Bannister.

"I do believe that I have been set up ... in this drug smuggling scheme": Anthony Bannister.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott this week launched the National Ice Taskforce, to be led by former Victoria Police chief commissioner Ken Lay, to combat the "scourge" of rising addiction rates of the "most dangerous drug" that he said was predisposing people to extreme violence and serious mental illness in Australia.

Mr Bannister's fate turns on whether the three Chinese judges presiding over his case give credence to his explanation that he had fallen foul of a callous scam perpetrated by three men he identified as "Justin", "KC" and "John Law".

The trio had convinced him, he said, that he could obtain a lucrative divorce settlement, having split from his ex-wife, a Filipino woman he met while living in Japan.

But in a process that became increasingly convoluted, he was told that a series of documents needed to be signed in person in Guangzhou, which resulted in him travelling to the city five times in the space of four months, usually only for a few days at a time.

Each time he would be told that another signature – and therefore another trip to Guangzhou – was required, while the promised "settlement" ballooned from an initial $US60,000 ($78,000) to more than $US1 million.

On his fateful last trip to Guangzhou in March last year, Mr Bannister was informed by "John Law" that his money had arrived, and to bring forward his flight back to Australia. Mr Bannister said "KC" helped reschedule his flights, but inserted a detour to Sydney at the last minute. In a taxi in Guangzhou the night before his flight, "KC" asked Mr Bannister to bring a suitcase with him as a favour. He said he never looked in the suitcase, which contained the drug-filled handbags.

"I had no knowledge of the drugs," he said. "I had no knowledge of the suitcase until March 10 ... until the night before I left."

But prosecutors said Mr Bannister's account was "conflicting and illogical", and that he chose to smuggle drugs because he was unemployed and had no income. They recommended the death penalty, to be carried out promptly. A verdict has yet to be handed down.

Mr Bannister's older brother James, who works as an engineer at a major oil and gas company, told Fairfax Media that Mr Bannister's version of events to the court was consistent with what he had been told, and that his younger brother was naive and trusting enough to fall for such a scam.

Their father David was a Vietnam War veteran who was exposed to Agent Orange, and their mother developed leukaemia while pregnant with Anthony, contributing to Mr Bannister's small stature and learning difficulties.

Mr Bannister dropped out of school after year 9 and took up an apprenticeship as a jockey in Mount Gambier. He would carve out a successful but short-lived career in Adelaide but the money and early success, James said, meant he'd "come off the rails".

"When he got a bit of money it went to his head, he blew it all," he said. "He burnt too many bridges in Adelaide and upset the wrong people."

With his reputation shot in Adelaide, Mr Bannister went to Japan to do track work, where he stayed for a decade, before returning to Australia where he raced in the Gold Coast as recently as 2010. But he stopped getting rides and wound up working shifts at a discount department store in Adelaide.

James said Anthony first told him about his trips to Guangzhou the weekend before Christmas in 2013. James had consistently warned Anthony that it sounded very suspicious, but the younger brother remained convinced until March 11.

"He rang me from the airport, all it was I could hear Chinese talking, and he said 'I'm in trouble, the police are here, they think it's drugs'," James said. "That was it."

James said he was upset at not having been able to speak directly to his brother since his arrest, and that as with most drug syndicates, the organisers appeared likely to remain untouched while the mules paid the price.

He said he had provided the Australian Federal Police with dozens of emails between Mr Bannister and the purported perpetrators of the scam, but neither Chinese nor Australian police had contacted him for an interview. "I've spoken to you longer than the police," he told Fairfax Media.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/theyve-...jockey-anthony-bannister-20150411-1mhazw.html
 
Chinese people.

I am a American. We made mistakes and now we are attempting fixing them. Your country is attempting using the same drug solutions America began using in the early 1900s. We learned these solutions are mistakes. Build on our booty (technology and medicine) and learn from our failures (drug policy). Y'all should avoid continuing repeating our failed drug policy and suffering the same regrettable consequences.
 
Last edited:
I am definitely not saying they are right but China has a lot longer history of dealing with drug addiction than America... When he started the Peoples revolution, Moa Zedong mantated that all addicts stop immediately or suffer the other option... The mass executions of all who did not get in line.. Pretty Fucked up...
 
It definitely sounds like a setup, and it's fucked up that he's being charged under Chinese law. The comment about the mules getting fucked by the law while the planners get away is 100% right.
 
I am definitely not saying they are right but China has a lot longer history of dealing with drug addiction than America... When he started the Peoples revolution, Moa Zedong mantated that all addicts stop immediately or suffer the other option... The mass executions of all who did not get in line.. Pretty Fucked up...

Need go to back further than that to the opium wars, where Britain forced addiction onto China as a means to control its economy. Its the reason why east Asia is so hardcore about drug laws. They don't want the western world's drug trade getting a foothold again. (On paper anyway.)
 
I don't have enough knowledge of Chinese history I could accurately comment on specifics. What I am talking about in the United States began around 1920 with alcohol prohibition. Though alcohol prohibition was repealed the concept of the drug solution being prohibition of recreational drugs remained and grew into the War on Drugs. In retrospect prohibition of drugs itself caused many of the regrettable consequences.

All drugs have risks and benefits. This is true of whatever drug we talk about. I even admit this is true of the drugs I hate too. Aggressively pursuing legal action against drug users didn't reduce illegal drug use and resulted in the largest prison population on the planet. The false information on whatever drug you might mention made drug use dangerous and exacerbated the social cost of all drug use. Our strict prohibition policies and War on Drugs false propaganda also caused negative consequences in countries outside of our borders.

In recent years we have proven many illegal drugs have great benefits. In fact the solution could be one involving using these illegal drugs in the treating of people with mental illness and addiction. Harm reduction programs (such as Bluelight) are also demonstrating accurate information about responsible drug use reduces the risks associated with drug use. This is true of whatever drug you might talk about. If our society had pursued an honest evidence based approach with our drug policy the drug wars and many of their consequences could have been avoided.

Some people argue honest information about drug use gives the wrong people potentially destructive information. In the modern world this argument is obsolete. I disagree with the aforementioned people.

I can't say with certainty what the solution is. We are learning from our mistakes. In our industrialization America proved strict prohibition, criminalization, and false drug propaganda had fleeting benefits.
 
Last edited:
Ex-Australian jockey facing death in China for drug smuggling has little hope, says brother

THE brother of a former South Australian jockey convicted of drug smuggling in China says the death penalty he faces may be better than life imprisonment in a hellish jail.

In an emotional interview with The Advertiser, James Bannister said his younger brother has “virtually no hope”.

Anthony Bannister, 43, was arrested in March last year at Guangzhou airport in China while attempting to smuggle 3kg of crystal methamphetamine — worth more than $1 million — into Australia.

Customs officers allegedly detected the drugs in envelopes in ladies’ handbags among his luggage.

Three judges will decide Mr Bannister’s fate, but his brother says he has already been told he has been found guilty and faces one of two shocking outcomes.

“They (Chinese authorities) have only really got the two options in sentencing and you’ve got to kind of weigh up which one will be best,” Mr Bannister said.

“Life in a Chinese prison could be worse than death and Tony’s only in his forties.”

Mr Bannister said he believes his brother — who had learning difficulties at school — is guilty of nothing more than being “gullible” or “just bloody stupid”.

“He’s never been into drugs and there’s not a person who knows him who thinks he’s an

international drug smuggler,” he said.

“And if he is, he’s bloody sh-t at it because he’s never had any money.”

Mr Bannister said he hasn’t spoken with his only brother since the moments after he was arrested on March 11 last year.

“He rang me from the airport and said ‘I’m in trouble with the police,” he added.

“He said they thought he had drugs in his luggage and all I could hear were these Chinese voices yelling in the background.

“It was the worst phone call of my life.”

A call the next day from the Foreign Affairs and Trade Department confirmed the dire situation, but it was another six days before the brothers communicated by e-mail.

Mr Bannister said DFAT officials advised him that trying to visit his brother would be “a waste of time”.

DFAT officials have been visiting Anthony about every six weeks and passing on family messages during the 13 months of his incarceration.

James Bannister has been sending $500 every month to China to pay for his brother’s upkeep.

The overall legal costs of over $20,000 have so far been covered by Australian legal aid.

“He’s really got virtually no hope,” Mr Bannister added.

“What they (Chinese) say goes and there’s nothing we can do.

He has heard Anthony has lost 6kg from his diminutive 50kg frame and is putting on “a brave face”.

At his trial last October, Chinese prosecutors requested the judge impose the death penalty on Mr Bannister, who told the court he was the unwitting “mule” in an elaborate smuggling scam perpetrated by three men he named as “Justin”, “KC” and “John Law”.

The scam surrounded a supposed alimony settlement Mr Bannister was told he would be receiving from his annulled marriage to a Filipino woman he met while riding trackwork in Japan.

Mr Bannister, whose mother died when he was child and is not close his father, had not told his brother he even had a girlfriend before getting married.

“I never met her but she does exist as we’ve got their marriage certificate issued in Japan,” James added.

“I think her intention was for him to get her to Australia and she basically dumped him when it wasn’t happening.

Cont -

http://www.news.com.au/sport/superr...ope-says-brother/story-fndpqu3p-1227304295644
 
Dire situation.

These articles aren't mentioning the NZ/Australian man who was busted with the girl that got let off not that long ago, I wonder why.

I wonder if he has been sentenced yet. It's all pretty hush hush when it's from China as far as I can gather.
 
Additional details about the wife situation make the initially bizarre story a little more plausible to me, but gullibility on that scale is difficult to imagine!
In any case, the man's fate in China seems grim in the extreme. Aren't there very explicit warnings at airports about packing your own bags and carrying
no one else's ?? Possession being 9/10 of the law as they say...
 
Top