treezy z
Bluelighter
The metoo movement is very important and it's being used for good by most. Sexual assault, it turns out, is extremely commonplace and there are many reasons why victims often don't report it. The movement not only empowers people to report sexual abuses of the past, it also empowers people to stop feeling ashamed for what someone else did to violate them.
However, as with anything, I have absolutely no doubt that people are capitalizing on the social environment from metoo in order to manipulate others, get revenge, etc. In fact recently a friend of mine's little brother turned down sex from his friend's sister at a party (she's a nutcase by the way). The next day she started telling everyone that he raped her, I guess because her feelings were hurt. No conviction happened because there was no proof, but it absolutely fucked his life, it was like he was guilty until proven innocent.
So, as much as I think metoo is a good thing, and I think it's a net positive, there is also something unfortunate going on along with it.
Although there is certainly an (important) distinction here, sex by coersion is still sexual misconduct.
How much coersion was there, really. I get the impression there WAS coersion in many cases (like he probably did that shit a dozen or more times, nevermind the actual assaults which I would guess is at least 5 but possibly much higher,) but many actresses are common prostitutes with a higher salary. My problem is not the actresses he had a prid pro quo arrangement with, it's the one's that never got a chance because of the environment of "you must suck/fuck fat pig producer for the job." A women who is not a prostitute would not take payment (movie role) for sex.