I deal with it. Personally, I'm happy i am able to think like this.
Same here. It gets really problematic when seeking psychiatric help for problems of more societal nature though. The cognitive differences create social conflicts of various degree; some of us seem to have a much harder time integrating with the surrounding society with the most difficult cases usually getting a schizophrenia diagnosis and the milder, more socially functional types seem to get lesser diagnoses of the same spectrum such as schizotypal (personality) disorder. The underlying mechanisms aren't really understood and thus are generally viewed as something that needs to be eradicated instead of something that could be an actually useful trait, even in a societal environment but under the right circumstances of course. A really crude analogy would perhaps be a person born with three legs, instead of teaching this person how to utilize the third leg it would be considered a better idea to remove the third leg and work from there (think about lobotomy for instance and how it actually was considered a nobel worthy invention at one point of our history). After all, the people who are responsible for providing the help have only ever had two legs and have no idea what it's like to have three legs.
I saw an interesting lecture online that sort of revolves around the same subject. Not sure how I should summarize it, but basically it theorizes about a link between religion, schizotypy, OCD, certain types of epilepsy and how these traits could have been useful in an evolutionary sense, explaining why these types of genes are still around. Historically, these traits may have served important and highly valued purposes in some cases (but not always!).
http://boingboing.net/2009/06/06/evolution-religion-s.html
I believe that what we're looking at here could be an extremely valuable resource for whole mankind, we just don't know how to properly utilize it in the modern western society, at least not anymore. Quite a shame actually. Neurodiversity is a concept I try to promote a lot and personally I believe it is applicable to the schizophrenia spectrum just as well as the autism spectrum. I
know that there's a lot I could be giving to society around me, but I have great difficulties doing so because there just doesn't seem to be an appropriate platform to do this. So in a way, I blame the society around me for my problems. On the other hand, many have perceived me as gifted or talented in some way or another but then blamed me for wasting it all because I haven't channeled it into something that is useful for others (despite trying my best walking the 'typical' path/mold that is bestowed on most of us right since birth).
Eventually a myriad of other problems often arise from all this, such as depression and anxiety. Hell, I believe most of my paranoia actually stems from the way I have been treated by the psychiatric institution, it's crazy what kind of things these people are permitted to do to you once it has been deemed by some random doctor that you cannot think 'properly'. As a patient in a mental ward I was not allowed to question the doctors even in the slightest sense without being labeled psychotic and paranoid, no matter how badly I felt that I was being mistreated. When I said that I really, really don't want to take anti-psychotic medication because I don't feel like I need it and it feels more like poison to me (a clear metaphor), the doctor would just write down in one of his files "patient believes that the hospital staff is trying to poison him and doesn't recognize his paranoia/psychosis which is a clear sign of schizophrenia". My natural response when I heard this was anger, which yet again becomes fuel for their fire, because agitation too is a clear sign of on-going psychosis. It's crazy and after enough of this kind of stuff, it's hard not to start questioning the motives of the people trying to offer their help. What I mean by this is, when I tried to accuse any of the doctors as incompetent, I would be labeled even more crazy, a lot of things I said were misinterpreted and twisted to suit the doctors view (he's not incompetent, I'm just crazy). I'm pretty sure most psychiatrists would ultimately put their own career above any patients needs. Once you have been admitted to involuntary treatment for any reason, the only way out is to literally agree with everything that gets thrown at you. I feel like I'm rambling already, there's so much more I could say when it comes to my personal experiences with mental wards for example but I don't feel like this is the appropriate post.
Vaya said:
To be frank, I think that the obscurities in your thinking patterns - which form a picture that you've managed to paint in crystal-clear detail with your words - highlight the daunting versatility of the human mind. There can be no one definition of "human mind," can there?
That was a great post. I really enjoyed reading it
Thank you. I have to agree that there really can't be an accurate definition of the 'human mind' at least not with our current technology (unless I guess the definition is extremely vague to the point of near uselessness). The only mind which we can truly and accurately examine is our own. This limits our perception of other minds in a rather profound way because we have to look at them from within the framework of our own thought-process.
Now I really need some sleep...