• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

The Official BL Cricket Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your not singing anymore..your not singing your not singing YOUR NOT SINGING ANYMORE!

Once Mcgrath&Warne retire your team is dead and buried.We are seeing the beginning of the end for the aussies. :D
 
Trust you to rub the salt in the wound. ;)

The English are just having a good run really.
 
SmC said:
Your not singing anymore..your not singing your not singing YOUR NOT SINGING ANYMORE!

Once Mcgrath&Warne retire your team is dead and buried.We are seeing the beginning of the end for the aussies. :D
Right now we need 30 more runs to win. Even if we don't get them, this proves that it's a bit early to get cocky. =D
 
What an amazing game, my gaster has been flabbered! Hats off to Lee and Kaspowicz great effort to get so close. I thought we would be gone within the first five overs.
 
Warnie, Lee and Kasper did brilliantly at the end. Some very poor bowling from the poms to the tail. You really have to question the potency of a bowling attack when the tail is able to wag the much. A few lucky escapes but generally the tailenders didn't look too worried or intimidated by the English bowling.
Ponting would have to be kicking himself and regretting his decision to bowl first. I don't understand his thinking behind his decision. McGrath was a late withdrawal so thats instantly a big loss, making Warne the greatest weapon in the attack. Why would you choose to bowl first when a spinner is your best weapon? Common sense should tell you that it would be of greater advantage to have Warne bowling later in the Test to get the best out of the pitch. Also electing to bowl somewhat takes some of the pressure off the Poms when our bowling attack isn't as strong as it could be due to the loss of McGrath. I would think it would have been much smarter to bat first and amass a large total and giving the bowlers something to work with and mentally crush the Poms that way.
Punter's field settings too were a bit poor in my opinion. Watching the game on tv ponting had fieldsmen virtually fielding behind each other, covering the same lines. Its a silly mistake that you'd expect to be made in poor grade club cricket but not by the best team in the world. Maybe Ponting doesn't rate the poms as much as he should and hasn't given them the respect he should. His field placings improved in the 2nd innings when he found the right mix of attack and run saving. For example having a couple of men in the deep to discourage Pieterson and Flintoff from playing their favourite shots. This then means they have to play shots they aren't as comfortable with and the wicket is gained that way. Sometimes patience is a virtue and all out attack is not warrented. I guess its something Ponting will learn the longer he is captain, its something Steve Waugh had down pat, its not always about obvious attack, sometimes subtle patience and strategy is needed.
Was a great match and definately makes the series more interesting now. Hopefully McGrath will be back for 3rd Test but it seems unlikely.
I must say I feel really sorry for Kasper, he looked absolutely gutted when he got out. That must be one of the worst feelings in the world. He would be thinking along the lines of "I just lost the match".


Beech out
 
Pleonastic said:
Right now we need 30 more runs to win. Even if we don't get them, this proves that it's a bit early to get cocky. =D

You want to talk about being cocky?The aussies thought they would win 5-0, Ponting was really arrogant coming into this match, and he got what he deserved in the second innings!Be ready to pass the number one spot over.:D
 
pekkie said:
Trust you to rub the salt in the wound. ;)

The English are just having a good run really.

Nah, your teams getting old and slow.Quite a few of them are over 30 and our team is an up and coming one, this english team has just changed the course of cricket history..;)
 
^^Hand the number 1 ranking over you say? I'm pretty sure I read in the paper during the week that England would have to have won the series 5-0 to take the number 1 ranking off the aussies.
All bullshit and national pride aside do you seriously think England is good enough to win the Ashes. I agree you have some very good up and coming players but Australia has a number of stars, more than the English side and has the psychological edge over the English. The Aussie side is aging but that doesn't really mean too much. McGrath and Warne still have a few years in them as do all the other players aproaching the mid 30 age bracket. Age doesn't neccessarily mean bad. Even at his retirement Steve Waugh was in some of the best form of his life.
My prediction for the series is a 4-1 victory to Australia. I think the batting of the English side isn't strong enough at the moment to beat the Aussies. It seems that Pieterson and Flintoff are the only men that could possibly stand in the Aussies way and you really can't rely on 2 batsmen, especially when one is an allrounder to win a series for you.
I think the Aussies have too much depth to lose this series. I think this Test will have been a wakeup call and that the Aussies will fire in the next Test. England will have some confidence but also may be scarred by the fact they almost lost it at the end. If the English were really true contenders to be the best in the world then they would have won the Test in a way more convincing fashion. It should never have been that close.
But yeah do you seriously think England is better than Australia putting all BULLSHIT and NATIONAL PRIDE aside?

Beech out
 
Gosh who said test cricket was boring huh?
Fantastic conclusion. I actually muttered that Australia would win about 40 runs out when Billy Bowden gave that LBW decision not out - as Michael Holding said - a man who works with pipes couldn't have been more plumber.
Not sure about England being better though. Typical pom reaction - "we won, we're the best there ever was".
Then you lose and you're pain is all over the tabloids the next day.
Still though, as a Kiwi I'll celebrate the English win as a victory for the game and, if I may indulge, sucker Aussie sucker!
 
beech said:

Ponting would have to be kicking himself and regretting his decision to bowl first. I don't understand his thinking behind his decision. McGrath was a late withdrawal so thats instantly a big loss, making Warne the greatest weapon in the attack. Why would you choose to bowl first when a spinner is your best weapon? Common sense should tell you that it would be of greater advantage to have Warne bowling later in the Test to get the best out of the pitch.

Beech out

I'm sure looking back Punter will be rueing that decision, but at the time he must have been thinking with the weather they had had previous there would be a lot in the pitch for the seamers early and the batting would get easier not harder. I'm sure he had envsioned getting the poms out early with sub 300 score then piling on the runs in Australia's first innings once the pitch had settled down. I can't imagine how he must have felt in the first hour to see the ball doing nothing and the pitch playing as flat and true as you will ever see an English wicket.
 
There were quite a few mistakes made in this test match by the Australians, but fuck it, I don't care. This was one of the MOST exciting games of Test Cricket that I have seen in a long time. I was disappointed but very encouraged with our depth, that Australia came so close. I was also happy that it turned out this way as it makes the series a hell of a lot more interesting.

Major amounts of respect to Andrew Flintoff, who directly after the final wicket was taken, went straight over to Brett Lee and Michael Kasprowicz and shook their hand and congratulated them on an awesome effort, while the rest of the English team (along with the entire crowd) went more than a little nuts. Now THAT is the spirit that the game is meant to be played in. Not only is Flintoff a rather spectacular cricketer, he seems like a top bloke as well.

I don't think that England can win the Ashes, and I think they will be horribly exposed at Old Trafford as the Aussies kick it up a gear, but this was seriously the best thing that could have happened for the series as it means that there is definitely the potential that it could go all the way to a live 5th Test.

Woo for the Ashes!!

CB :)
 
Yeah it was a great game- real edge of your seat stuff that hasn't occurred to much in the last 10 years. Looks like England may have a chance in the third now- due to Lee's infected knee. People are speculating about Tate but he's a little too erratic for my liking- i'd like to see Nathan Bracken bowl- not the fastest in the world but left arm with some swing and a fair degree of control. He kinda reminds me of Terry Aldeman who was an absolute pom destroyer over in England! I think England deserved the win at Edgebaston but really the victory was gifted to Vaughn by poor tactical decisions by Ponting electing to bat second, poor loose bowling and fielding in the England first innings with far too many no balls- England probably won the match from no balls. All it will take for Australia to win the remaining matches is one century (or near enough) a match by the first four batsmen. For England to just win on it's best ground- minus Mcgrath bowling- does not bode well for the rest of the ashes considering that it had to break historical milestones to set it up and then almost let Australia break the record for the highest second innings total to win. Now the question is will they play two spinners at Old Trafford?

Did Warnie's dismissal look a little deliberate to anyone? Maybe the scallywag has been talking to John the Bookmaker and had bets on after the first test!
 
Chaos Butterfly said:

Major amounts of respect to Andrew Flintoff, who directly after the final wicket was taken, went straight over to Brett Lee and Michael Kasprowicz and shook their hand and congratulated them on an awesome effort, while the rest of the English team (along with the entire crowd) went more than a little nuts. Now THAT is the spirit that the game is meant to be played in. Not only is Flintoff a rather spectacular cricketer, he seems like a top bloke as well.

Woo for the Ashes!!

CB :)
 
expEri mEntal said:
Walks in and starts the happy dance

Looks like Lee will probably be out for Thursday's test along with McGrath

Link



:p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p
You guys have spent so long planning how to beat our four main bowlers, there's every chance someone else who you have no idea how to bat against will come in and take you by surprise. =D

It's not like you're not on a knifes edge either though. If Flintoff's shoulder goes again you're in just as bad a place with injuries as we are!
 
Pleonastic said:
You guys have spent so long planning how to beat our four main bowlers, there's every chance someone else who you have no idea how to bat against will come in and take you by surprise. =D

It's not like you're not on a knifes edge either though. If Flintoff's shoulder goes again you're in just as bad a place with injuries as we are!

Valid point but you are bringing in Stuart Clark link who plays county for Middlesex so our batters will have had some experiance of batting against him.

From the previous two tests it is evident that nothing can be taken for granted in this series, none the less I prefer Lee and McGrath to be kept in the pavillion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top