TheLoveBandit
Retired Never Was, Coulda been wannabe
I don't know how many of you heard-read-noticed-cared, but I did catch some blurbs about the ALA-CLEM game being on a neutral site (Chick-Fil-A Bowl, Atlanta) as a way to get a decent non-conference matchup and pay both schools (avoiding the home-away sequence of one year with a payday and one year on the road). The talking heads were indicating this is viewed as 'fertile ground' for the bowl committees in that they can generate more money for everyone involved by splitting the take (evenly?) between the teams and thereby getting a bit better matchup which in turn generates better TV money coming in.
With that in mind, I really do hope we can see a future (4-6 yrs out?) where conferences are signing up for a rivalry series of match ups. Right now, it's totally dependent upon who is willing to do a home-away and with whom, so you've got a hodge-podge of mixed conference regular season games. Basketball has those early season games where most of the conference teams have a matchup against a member of a rival conference (ACC-BigEast, Big12-Big10, whatever they are) and the conferences make the money then split it amongst the teams. Same thing could be done for football, where one of the early non-conference games are moved to neutral 'bowl' sites, and you have one weekend of a bunch of PAC10-Big11 games, or ACC-BigEast games.
I suppose the tradeoff is that you come out usually with one conference 'owning' the other, so they will float higher in the rankings and in bowl selections, but the positive is more money for everyone (major driving factor) and a lot more interest by fans, and a lot better competition for those non-conference games.
Just a thought.
With that in mind, I really do hope we can see a future (4-6 yrs out?) where conferences are signing up for a rivalry series of match ups. Right now, it's totally dependent upon who is willing to do a home-away and with whom, so you've got a hodge-podge of mixed conference regular season games. Basketball has those early season games where most of the conference teams have a matchup against a member of a rival conference (ACC-BigEast, Big12-Big10, whatever they are) and the conferences make the money then split it amongst the teams. Same thing could be done for football, where one of the early non-conference games are moved to neutral 'bowl' sites, and you have one weekend of a bunch of PAC10-Big11 games, or ACC-BigEast games.
I suppose the tradeoff is that you come out usually with one conference 'owning' the other, so they will float higher in the rankings and in bowl selections, but the positive is more money for everyone (major driving factor) and a lot more interest by fans, and a lot better competition for those non-conference games.
Just a thought.