Dude. I'll put this as nice as possible:
#1 - Not one of your points was an effective intellectual attack on the position I had made initially. NOT ONE. If you want me to care about what you have to say when you start an argument you need to at least address the stuff you quote with relevant factual material that undermines the points that I am making. Ex. Phil Jackson may have more rings but that doesn't mean he coached that series better.If you think that he did coach that series better, start laying down some reasons why.You used the present plural "are" instead of the past subjunctive singular "were". Your improper use of our language led to my comment about Phil Jackson 1
Great - you hate Kobe. Irrelevant. I think (maybe incorrectly) that my opinion of Kobe is shared by others and Kobe did not hype himself up for a long time or did he literally make a show about is greatness and people still hate him. It makes sense to me people are hating on LeBron. 2
Great - Heat was supposed to be epic - they aren't obviously and Wade/Bron are having to carry. Ergo, Irrelevant Yeah, that one is probably irrelevant
Great - MJ played less minutes on average than LeBron did last night. Again - Irrelevant.You used four sentences to excuse and/or explain his 4th quarter play. LeBron (who played 46, not 47 minutes) is often said to have the potential to be the greatest. MJ, the standard of NBA greatness, played similar minutes in the aforementioned Finals. There was no talk of him choking in the 4th. Fans loved and still love MJ. The average minutes played in the 6 MVP Finals was 43.1. You think a 3 minute (6.3%) difference is enough to make that irrelevant? In all of those Finals, MJ was older than LeBron is now. Also, LeBron has had an extra two years of NBA experience over MJ at this stage in his career and still can not seal the deal. He delivered on his hype almost always (disregard baseball "career" please). LeBron has had an incredible amount of hype, by himself and by the media, and on his biggest stage, he is not performing as promised/expected. People like to ridicule people who talk smack and fail. . Several more reasons why that was relevant
Your definitive statement "LeBron can't play post and doesn't play without the ball" was refuted and that was not mentioned.
#2 - I was merely trying to play devil's advocate because the bandwagoning LeBron hating could be easily countered by the simple fact that the Mavs played an absolutely brilliant game and are without doubt the best team in the league. Not to mention the fact that I can't think of any player in the league right now who, in the place of LeBron, could have won that game. But that's enough out of me. I'll let you guys get back to your arguing for the sake of arguing. Should have known better than to post an opinion out there.. lol.