o0psy Daisy
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2002
- Messages
- 838
I subject my father to at least a few good hours of electronic music, most of which happens to be psytrance and goa trance, sometimes breaks and cheesy cheese every time we take a long road trips, which is about 6 to 8 times a year for the past four years. Poor old man
Recently, on a trip down to FL, we had a debate about the limitations of electronic music as he reached down to turn switch off the current music.
One of his argument was that because the music is made using machines, any of the sounds can be duplicated by any competant artist, therefore while the original artists' music is well, original... people after him can copy his sounds given that the machines are the same and this is why a lot of electronic music sounds the same. It is simply not as good as the music that is made with string, wood, or brass instruments because the human hand-- apt to make mistakes but also having the ability to put human emotion and skill through the instrument-- is making that music.
Anyone with a trained ear can hear how the rhythm in a rock song gets a teesny bit quicker as the song plays through, whereas a constant bass in electronic music is pretty standard. This is the nature of human vs machine: human (natural) imperfection vs programmed perfection.
Now, I know next to nothing about music production, but I do know that different software and different synths can out put amazingly original sounds. Humans still tell the machine what to do and how to do it, so I disagree with my father in that there is less emotion and creativity in an electonically made song (given that the song is genuinely good), but I do think that sounds can easily be duplicated thus the reason many tracks sound the same because there are only so many sounds that can be created using the machines.
What are your thoughts? Producers, take a hit!
Daisy
One of his argument was that because the music is made using machines, any of the sounds can be duplicated by any competant artist, therefore while the original artists' music is well, original... people after him can copy his sounds given that the machines are the same and this is why a lot of electronic music sounds the same. It is simply not as good as the music that is made with string, wood, or brass instruments because the human hand-- apt to make mistakes but also having the ability to put human emotion and skill through the instrument-- is making that music.
Anyone with a trained ear can hear how the rhythm in a rock song gets a teesny bit quicker as the song plays through, whereas a constant bass in electronic music is pretty standard. This is the nature of human vs machine: human (natural) imperfection vs programmed perfection.
Now, I know next to nothing about music production, but I do know that different software and different synths can out put amazingly original sounds. Humans still tell the machine what to do and how to do it, so I disagree with my father in that there is less emotion and creativity in an electonically made song (given that the song is genuinely good), but I do think that sounds can easily be duplicated thus the reason many tracks sound the same because there are only so many sounds that can be created using the machines.
What are your thoughts? Producers, take a hit!
Daisy
