The drug that's a tourist attraction

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
The drug that's a tourist attraction

This drink will make you sick. It will make you throw up, in huge, violent bursts, and you'll probably need to crawl to the toilet at some point as well.
Then the hallucinations will start. Maybe they'll be pleasant and life-affirming. But the chances are they'll be nightmarish, full of ghouls and demons that will appear from within. You'll feel weak, maybe like your heart is slowly stopping, or like the world around you is shrinking, escaping from your grasp.

Eventually, however, it will wear off, and you'll find yourself back in the South American jungle, deep in the forest – but you may never be the same again.
The drink I'm talking about is ayahuasca, a hallucinogenic, medicinal shaman brew of the Amazon that has long been used in the indigenous cultures of Colombia and Peru, but is also experiencing a surge in popularity as a tourism attraction for Westerners seeking something different.

The tourists want in. They've heard about this spiritual brew, an infusion of plants containing dimethyltryptamine (DMT), that – depending on your point of view – either heals its users and allows them all new spiritual understanding, or just gets them wasted on hallucinogens.

It's a business. Go to Iquitos in Peru, the nerve centre of ayahuasca tourism, and you'll see signs of the practice all over the place, and will be offered an experience within minutes. Some of the ayahuasca is brewed and distributed in controlled environments, providing tourists the safest experience possible – while some of it is doled out by shoddy shamans keen to make a tourist buck.
Greg Carter is the director of Chimu Adventures, an Australian tour operator specialising in Latin American adventures. His company has seen a rise in interest in ayahuasca tourism, which he puts down to travellers looking for that "authentic" experience.

"Originally ayahuasca had a bit of a cult status on the backpacker scene," Greg says. "Backpackers went to Peru, and with the lure of a natural, legal hallucinogenic drug, people obviously tried it. I suppose in the last few years with the growth in cultural tourism, and experiential tourism, people have moved on to this kind of thing to enhance their experience, become more ingrained in a local culture. People want to do what locals do."

Greg stresses that while it might be popular, ayahuasca is not exactly 100 per cent safe. "It's something we don't generally sell. There's a lot of danger around it, and a lot of people do die every year. Quite often that goes unreported. There are some places in Peru that are recommended, or who do have a good reputation – places like Rainforest Expeditions – but there's a lot of random shamans in places like Cusco that if you walk off the street and give them 20 bucks, you can get ayahuasca done without any preparation. There needs to be a fasting and cleansing period leading up to it. I would say to people, be very, very careful."

I haven't tried ayahuasca. I'm interested in it, but I'm also scared of it. It sounds like a massive risk. An Australian friend of mine, Chrisy Long, however, has spent the last month at an ayahuasca retreat in Peru called The Way Inn. The experience has had such a huge effect on her life that she's quit her job back home and decided to stay and work at the retreat.

"Ayahuasca is an incredible medicine," Chrisy says. "While I don't think the majority of people will suddenly leave their jobs, for me, it just feels right. I've had my spiritual awakening and now the universe is really pushing me in that direction."

Right. So what's the big appeal? "You can talk to as many people about their experience and they will all be different. Everyone is on their own personal journey. Everyone has different experiences.
"It's really difficult to put non-linear experiences into linear words. Aya just works so differently with everyone. You either get amazing fractal geometric visions and an acknowledgement of outer space, or you get experiences that are more family- or relationship-based, working with childhood or past-life experiences.

"You go through different family members, as many as seven generations before and ahead, all the emotions you went though and all the sad and happy memories, and you begin to understand your purpose as well as their purpose in life. It's like having 20 years of therapy."

Sounds... weird. Rather than focus on the one crazed hallucinogenic experience, The Way Inn does nine-day ayahuasca sessions with its clients. "We're focused on clearing those lifelong blockages, helping to undo lifelong patterns which you can take back with you into the Western world," Chrisy says. "We find the majority of clients transform in some way for the positive by the end of the retreat."

Like I said, I'm interested in ayahuasca, but I'm also scared of it. Our Western view, the one that's hammered into us from school age, is that "drugs are bad, mmkay", but who's to say that's true in this case? What if the shamans have got it all figured out? What if ayahuasca is a path to spiritual nirvana?

Or, on the other hand, what if it's just a night of petrifying hallucinations and soiling yourself? I doubt I'll ever have the guts to find out.
Have you ever tried ayahuasca? Would you? Have you had an experience overseas that could match ayahuasca? Are you surprised that this has become a tourist attraction? Have you engaged in risky behaviour while travelling? What was your experience like?

With comments -

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/travel/blogs/...-attraction-20131203-2ynjl.html#ixzz2mZS4OyNK
 
They've heard about this spiritual brew, an infusion of plants containing dimethyltryptamine (DMT), that – depending on your point of view – either heals its users and allows them all new spiritual understanding, or just gets them wasted on hallucinogens.

I am not sure about this...It really doesn't depend on "your point of view".
If you listen to and read the stories of thousands of people who claim to have been healed by their ayahuasca experiences, the only way to say that it simply gets you "wasted" is to ignore these people - who have actually done it.
I would say that whether it heals you or gets you wasted depends simply on your level of knowledge of ayahuasca.

(Written by someone who has learned a great deal from ayahuasca!)
 
I emailed the article's author and and submitted the quoted below for the moderated comments section. I urge anyone who is motivated to comment here on bluelight about factual inaccuracies in media articles to do the same in order have more of an impact on public opinion (and post that you did here to spread the idea). Most journalists care about facts despite what it may seem sometimes and they won't intentionally make the same mistake twice. Bluelight is a good place to talk but we're all preaching to the choir.
Mr. Groundwater,

For the sake of your reader's health and journalistic integrity please edit the online version of your article, "The Drug That's a Tourist Attraction," to explain that it is the MAO-inhibiting chemicals in one of the plant constituents of ayahuasca's admixture plants that makes the brew potentially dangerous for people on certain medications. For instance see Ayahuasca Preparations and Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: A Potential Combination for Severe Adverse Interactions: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02791072.1998.10399712#.UqAKUeLNlDk

Here is a list of drug classes to avoid if taking ayahuasca:
http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/maois/maois_info3.shtml

While perhaps not inaccurate, it is misrepresentative to state that ayahuasca kills people when any MAO-inhibitor poses the same risks. See this list for DMT's lethal dose in 50 percent of mice:http://www.lycaeum.org/mv/mu/LD50_list.html

As you can see, it is likely a person may have to intravenously inject as much as 110 mgs of DMT for every kilogram of body weight to kill 50 percent of them if the rodent data used to estimate lethal doses of most drugs can be extrapolated (avg psychedelic human DMT dose: only 90mg, so your stomach couldn't even hold that much ayahuasca liquid)

The only other reason a person could plausibly die from ayahuasca is plant allergies. Ayahuasca is physiologically safe otherwise. People are seriously uneducated an blatantly propagandized to about the dangers of psychedelic drugs, the most common of which are not physiologically dangerous. They can also do ayahusca at home without paying to fly anywhere if they are know how to obtain the ingredients (check local laws and arrest rates to see if you can plausibly get away with it).
 
Yeah it sux when they do that (close the comments) but I think since they apparently published the article here yesterday then they can't keep moderating and publishing comments for too long as I'd imagine they'd get thousands sometimes.

Another article that was posted 6 months ago is this one -

http://www.news.com.au/travel/austr...al-awakening8217/story-e6frfq7r-1226667235924

If anyone is keen on reading more, also with comments.
 
^ I tried to leave a comment, but for some reason the comments are now closed :(
Weird, mine just went up. I submitted it literally a minute before here, so you missed it by 9 minutes. Oh well. I covered a few big points and replied to the comment closest to the top so as soon as people scan down looking for comments it'll be the first they see (10 people reading now according to the site's meter so it's still getting lots of traffic).

Heh, you know what half way through writing this I just wondered about the timing of the close so I decided to do a google search for ""The Drug That's a Tourist Attraction," to explain that it is" from my post above as a statistically improbable phrase and up popped this thread. I doubt it, but maybe they've got software that uses google to search for other web publications currently publishing new stuff of their site content to track how many are doing it (newspapers hate that because there goes ad revenue) and up came my post calling for people to comment on drug stories. Like I said, doubtful but it'd be funny if they were worried about a potential flood of random druggies from around the planet!
 
Last edited:
I dont get what you mean by the search for 'The Drug That's a Tourist Attraction', as when I search google for it, so far this thread isnt on the first two pages. But I bet in some time, over time, this will show up near the top results.

I possibly misinterpreted what you just said tho also.

I see they have posted your comment tho, right at the top as you said, that's good.

if i search for 'The Drug That's a Tourist Attraction psood0nym' I see this thread at the top of google tho :)
 
Last edited:
^If you look in post #3 in the quote of the email and post to the paper that I sent the quote is is in the body of that. Copy and paste this next full line:

""The Drug That's a Tourist Attraction," to explain that it is"

You probably missed the extra quote at the beginning (which is confusing). There's nothing special about that quote, though. I randomly copied and pasted it from a small section when I was in a hurry to see if google had crawled this thread already. The only place online that has that exact quote is this thread, so it comes up first when you type it in quotes in google since it's a statistically improbable phrase (I just tried it again and it works for me).

I also forgot to mention in my first post that I had to search for the journalist's email. It was really easy, so if the website doesn't have it and you're trying to contact them directly you can usually find it. This is usually really effective in getting replies too (unless they're NYT reporters or something) if your subject line states exactly your point and you're, brief, courteous and rational.
 
Last edited:
Then the hallucinations will start. Maybe they'll be pleasant and life-affirming. But the chances are they'll be nightmarish
----------

Says who? I doubt the bad trip to good trip ratio is very high with this, and it wouldn't be so popular if it was. While you should be careful with maoi's this stuff is probably safer than mdma.
 
The author obviously hasn't heard of drug tourism before.

Many of these Ayahuasca experiences in places like Peru are just tourist attractions, chances are the dude isn't even a shaman but some ex bus driver from Lima.
Not to say there aren't legitimate operations but I do question the authenticity of a shaman who doesn't seem to have more pressing spiritual matters than performing nightly Ayahuasca ceremonies on gringos for cash (quite a bit for SA if I recall).
 
I emailed the article's author and and submitted the quoted below for the moderated comments section. I urge anyone who is motivated to comment here on bluelight about factual inaccuracies in media articles to do the same in order have more of an impact on public opinion (and post that you did here to spread the idea). Most journalists care about facts despite what it may seem sometimes and they won't intentionally make the same mistake twice. Bluelight is a good place to talk but we're all preaching to the choir.

Holding journalists accountable is a great idea. Some errors are forgivable, but too often we see incomplete articles, unanswered questions, and just flat-out wrong information. A lot of things can be fixed with Google or a telephone, but I suspect we get what we get when news organizations often barely pay above minimum wage.
 
Top