IamMe90
Bluelighter
My question is this: is the difference in effect between higher potency strains such as cyanascens/azurascens and cubensis more than merely alkaloid content?
The basis for this question is largely anecdotal. My first experience with cyanescens involved taking a sixteenth, and my first experience with cubensis involved taking an eighth, both in nearly identical sets/settings - given that cyanascens is roughly twice the potency of cubensis, shouldn't the two at least be roughly comparable in effect? Nothing could be farther from my experiences, however. My cyanascens trip was out of this fucking world full blown psychedelia - first, immeasurable fear, followed by full blown ego death, and then complete euphoria. The visuals were the most intense I've ever experienced on any psychedelic drug - things weren't just breathing, they were absolutely warping - like the world was a giant lava lamp. Everything, sound an sight alike, was perceived as moving in what can only be described as extreme slow-mo: voices sounded like flanged, drawn out demonic frog croaks, and I could see their soundwaves flit across the room.
Cubensis, on the other hand, didn't even compare. A stock mushroom trip - cool color enhancement and hallucinations, fairly intense, but really, my ego was intact and the most intense part about it was the minor anxiety attack I had at the peak. I was able to solo this easy, whereas on my cyanascens trip, if my best friend hadn't been there, I feel I surely would have remained in the fetal position for the entire 9 hours.
I know this is anecdotal, but it mystifies me. I'm absolutely no chemist or pharmacologist, so I really don't know anything about this, but I wonder if someone can shed some light. Could have to do with the metabolizing? That is, because such a high amount of alkaloids were metabolized in a smaller concentration, the experience was more profound? I feel there's a parallel here with cannabis, where I can never really replicate the effects of good weed by smoking a ton of mids, for instance.
Any contributions appreciating, even if to point out how woefully ignorant I am.
The basis for this question is largely anecdotal. My first experience with cyanescens involved taking a sixteenth, and my first experience with cubensis involved taking an eighth, both in nearly identical sets/settings - given that cyanascens is roughly twice the potency of cubensis, shouldn't the two at least be roughly comparable in effect? Nothing could be farther from my experiences, however. My cyanascens trip was out of this fucking world full blown psychedelia - first, immeasurable fear, followed by full blown ego death, and then complete euphoria. The visuals were the most intense I've ever experienced on any psychedelic drug - things weren't just breathing, they were absolutely warping - like the world was a giant lava lamp. Everything, sound an sight alike, was perceived as moving in what can only be described as extreme slow-mo: voices sounded like flanged, drawn out demonic frog croaks, and I could see their soundwaves flit across the room.
Cubensis, on the other hand, didn't even compare. A stock mushroom trip - cool color enhancement and hallucinations, fairly intense, but really, my ego was intact and the most intense part about it was the minor anxiety attack I had at the peak. I was able to solo this easy, whereas on my cyanascens trip, if my best friend hadn't been there, I feel I surely would have remained in the fetal position for the entire 9 hours.
I know this is anecdotal, but it mystifies me. I'm absolutely no chemist or pharmacologist, so I really don't know anything about this, but I wonder if someone can shed some light. Could have to do with the metabolizing? That is, because such a high amount of alkaloids were metabolized in a smaller concentration, the experience was more profound? I feel there's a parallel here with cannabis, where I can never really replicate the effects of good weed by smoking a ton of mids, for instance.
Any contributions appreciating, even if to point out how woefully ignorant I am.
