Conspiracies The Covid Narrative

[Jabberwocky]

There's millions of people in this country who are going to become very violent if they try that path, I can tell you that for a fact. Again, I have no responsibility for the health of other people.

so it is OK for millions to violate bodily sovereignity of other people through violence, because you have no responsibility for their health. but, the second someone wants you to do something to protect your own health and that of others, you are being violated.

can you clarify then, is it ok for me to exercise my bodily sovereignity through violence towards others and then face no consequences? cos that's really what it sounds like you're saying.

 

[dalpat077]

Would you like to me to list out for you the nations where they haven't taken our draconian approach and are just a-ok?

Yeah. I would like to see that list. No offence. But this IS the Internet here. I mean as it stands right now and thanks to a post yesterday: in my mind's eye I picture EU citizens rioting and looting in the streets and selling their bodies for food (particularly in Lithuania).

No one has a responsibility to protect the health of anyone else. We have never held that premise as a cultural belief or attitude. You can choose to, if you wish, but that's what it has actually always been.. a free choice, not a implied responsibility.

That's a bit of a slippery slope no? Especially if you start bringing cultural belief and attitude into the equation? Ethics in other words no?

 

[Zopiclone bandit]

Nice try. And old news.

"Gain-of-function" research not the same thing as creating a virus from scratch specifically to be used as a bio-weapon (which is what I was responding to).

And actually it shoots the bio-weapon conspiracy theory in the foot anyway i.e. "gain-of-function" research on BAT corona viruses. Dunno. From where I sit that suggests that the virus itself came from a BAT. If somebody left the fucking door open by mistake well then shit happens (and has happened).

Fucking waste of money and time and energy and good brains. Surely to fuck there's a better virus to have been fucking about with more suited to being a bio-weapon. And come to think of it: what was wrong with good 'ol chemicals or poison or radiation? Too obvious? There'd still have been plenty money to be made. Believe me: there's no limit to how much somebody would pay for an antidote if they were bleeding from every orifice! Also no arguments about wearing (gas) masks!

Nah. This whole thing wasn't thought out proper by the NWO!

Cause it came from a bat & it's old news as this stuff has been going on since WW2.

 

[dalpat077]

cos that's really what it sounds like you're saying.

Well we're obviously on the same page here i.e. I wanted to add to my previous retort above: why am I mandated, by law, to NOT go and blast my neighbor away (that I don't particularly like albeit not for any good or valid reason i.e. dude moans too much and EVERYTHING including this pandemic is bullshit and a conspiracy and he knows it ALL).

 

[dalpat077]

Cause it came from a bat & it's old news as this stuff has been going on since WW2.

Nope. I was talking about this Fauci shit and the NIH (as being old news).

 

[Zopiclone bandit]

Nope. I was talking about this Fauci shit and the NIH (as being old news).

 

[dalpat077]

"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing".


That pretty sums up this whole fuckin debate.


I personally would rather listen to people that have worked in the field (e.g. @chinup ) than some cunt posting a video on YouTube.

Yeah. Listen up. Science and statisticians and the WHO and the medical profession are not entirely without blame for all of the shit that's ended up out there either.

Just this week there was a research paper published where is was purported that mask wearing was over 50% effective in stopping the spread. Turns out: they didn't even do a study of their own i.e. they took a bunch of old, questionable, studies and trials, and with very little merit to them, did some mathematical gymnastics, and came up with the +50% figure. Meanwhile and back at the ranch: once drilled down into the data the efficiency in reality was around a maximum of 20%. Problem is that this was published by an academic institution so of course it was taken as gospel no questions asked (until somebody did ask).

And don't take the figures I've just quoted as gospel either i.e. they're close (I think). But there's an entire investigative podcast on this from the BBC. I just don't have the time now to search for it but will get to it later (and post yet another link that nobody will even click on I'm sure).

 

[Jabberwocky]

Don't believe every manufactured tweet you read man (even if they claim to be an MD on the internetz)

The data people are pulling off that tool is highly out of context as well as unverified reports. Anyone can file a report of an ADR. I wouldn't be surprised if many are fake or overstated from people thinking they're now magnetic after the vaccine.

Also - this includes things like "I had a headache" or "I felt a bit queasy for a few minutes" or "my arm was sore for a day" as ADRs.

This "data" has been demonstrably misleading. Just because this data is from the WHO does not mean people are interpreting it correctly, NOR HAS IT BEEN VERIFIED! None of those reports are verified!

Don't you think the WHO would have admitted it was dangerous by now if they list the numbers on their own website?

Someone showed me this ADR data about a year ago, and I debunked it back then, too.

I guess now this data is circulating around again? lol

I mean, right off the bat this data is highly misleading - it doesn't show you the ratio of administered vaccines to ADR events... It also lists Ivermectin and Chloroquine which aren't even fucking vaccines... it's so damn obvious this data is cherry picked to mislead... I mean come on? I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but this is clear confirmation bias that people will drink up without questioning it at all because it fits into their "Covid Narrative" conspiracy theory

Fact check: Video on World Health Organization's VigiAccess tool lacks context

The World Health Organization's VigiAccess tool is being misrepresented online to suggest vaccines are dangerous.

www.usatoday.com