Kenickie
Bluelight Crew
Come on, you are blaming medical science for your friend being a bitch? I'd blame the fact her parents had trouble conceiving there for were over protective, helicopter parents who raised her to believe she was more special than everyone else.
yeah, i am :/
These hardly seem to be the ones to be demanding c-sections Kenicke. I'd say it would more due to your poor health system as a whole not simply the increase in rate of c sections. As you said this is for the developed world. Look at the infant death rates for the whole world and you will find the bottom hundred countries are those too poor to have any medical intervention.
The number of maternal deaths is significantly understated because of a lack of effective data collection in the US A .
who knows how many actual women & babies are dying, because that's not the kind of thing americans keep track of. Tennessee has a maternal death rate higher than most parts of Africa. what's the deal with that?
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-12/...hs-and-complications-pregnancy/2?_s=PM:HEALTHWhite women have a mortality rate of 9.5 per 100,000 pregnancies, the CDC said. For African-American women, that rate is 32.7 deaths per 100,000 pregnancies.
The CDC analysis shows that deaths during pregnancy and childbirth have doubled for all U.S. women in the past 20 years.
In 1987, there were 6.6 deaths for every 100,000 pregnancies. The number of deaths had climbed to 13.3 per 100,000 in 2006, the last year for which figures were available.
sure, poor black people don't schedule csections... but white ladies sure do.
The increases — documented in a report published Tuesday — have caused debate and concern for years. When needed, a Caesarean can save the mother and her child from injury or death, but most experts doubt that one in three women need surgery to give birth. Critics say the operation is being performed too often, needlessly exposing women and babies to the risks of major surgery. The ideal rate is not known, but the World Health Organization and health agencies in the United States have suggested 15 percent.
The continuing rise “is not going to be good for anybody,” said Dr. George A. Macones, the chairman of obstetrics and gynecology at Washington University in St. Louis and a spokesman for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “What we’re worried about is, the Caesarean section rate is going up, but we’re not improving the health of babies being delivered or of moms.”
Risks to the mother increase with each subsequent Caesarean, because the surgery raises the odds that the uterus will rupture in the next pregnancy, an event that can be life-threatening for both the mother and the baby. Caesareans also increase the risk of dangerous abnormalities in the placenta during later pregnancies, which can cause hemorrhaging and lead to a hysterectomy. Repeated Caesareans can make it risky or even impossible to have a large family.
The new report notes that Caesareans also pose a risk of surgical complications and are more likely than normal births to cause problems that put the mother back in the hospital and the infant in an intensive-care unit. The report states, “In addition to health and safety risks for mothers and newborns, hospital charges for a Caesarean delivery are almost double those for a vaginal delivery, imposing significant costs.”
Fay Menacker, an author of the report and a statistician at the National Center for Health Statistics, which published the report, said, “There’s been an increase for women of all ages and racial and ethnic groups, and all states.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/health/24birth.html
I'm not against c-sections, they save lives in emergencies. but excessive csections, i'm not okay with. epsecially when doctors say:
Nonmedical issues are also involved. Obstetricians, fearful of being sued if there is harm to a baby after a normal labor and delivery, are quicker than they used to be to perform a Caesarean.
“The threshold for doing a Caesarean section is going down, and one of the major factors is professional liability, ending up in court,” Dr. Macones said.
In an article last month in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology, the obstetricians’ college reported that a poll of 5,644 of its members found that 29 percent said they were performing more Caesareans because they feared lawsuits. Eight percent said they had quit delivering babies, and nearly a third of those said it was because of liability issues.
that's not a doctor caring about mom & baby, that's a doctor caring about themselves. if people really want the cs rate to go down, stop saying things like "c-sections are easier/safer/etc", cut out the unnecessary inductions, provide real information about VBACs, and stop trying to run up every labouring woman's bill up.
I can say for the two births I was personally involved in I would take the planned c section any day of the week. One was 36 hours labour followed by emergency surgery and a week in ICU , while the second was a c section and the mother and child were released after 2 days, both happy and healthy.
again, i'm not against csections, and it sounds like it was needed to make sure mom and baby came home happy and healthy.
i don't know what it's going to take people to really look at the way Americans treat moms. black women (like in Tennessee) are still dying and losing their babies in the same ways they were in slave times, but now, white women are dying in ways they weren't 20 years ago. the fact that the government of my country doesn't think keeping track of women who die from maternal issues is worth it should say enough as it is.