We don't even know how significantly a random tripper would be able to differentiate between ALD-52 and LSD, let's start with that. Or if not yet right now, be cool about the theories that build on that difference.![]()
I know ALD-52 works, I was talking about the synth. And it's profitable now because there's a thriving internet drug community, online distribution, and easily available synth information, which there wasn't for most of LSD's (or ALD-52's) history. Also, there's a big difference between an established research chemical manufacturer with legitimate connections for precursors and equipment and an illegal clandestine drug lab that has to pay a large upcharge for underground materials and distribution.But we know that ALD-52 does work, that has been known for a long time. And I guess it must be profitable because they're still producing them now.
I think a lot of us here have had the same experience, having little problem with psychedelics but having anxiety and over-thinking manifest with weed.
Hmm well what experience did you have with them? That's what's printed on mine but I just checked and the spacing/layout of the text is actually different than yours, although that could just be from an insignificant error in regards to lining up the paper with the printer.
Hmm, interesting. Just how bitter is it? It doesn't numb your mouth does it? Is it just a little bitter? Or significantly so?
Ultimately we can't ID anything on here because of rules and practicality. You've done the right thing getting a kit, and that will be the only thing that can tell you anything real. I'm going to try to tread lightly here with anything I say.
If your vendor did indeed get them from *the* trustworthy private vendor, you should be OK. Everything lines up in that regard. Unless this is a well executed scheme with the same print etc. The ink spatters and yellow staining are nothing to be concerned with specifically. The corresponding blotters from the trustworthy private vendor are said to look like that as well.
The bitter taste might be your perception of what I describe as an "electric sour" taste to lysergamides/blotter tabs (could actually be the inks I taste, but I think it's actually the chemical). It seems like not everyone tastes that, and that people perceive it differently. If it was really strongly bitter, that's supposed to be a sign of an NBOMe.
Anyways, good idea that you got a kit. Hopefully it can distinguish between lysergamides and NBOMes.
Just because ALD-52 had been produced a few times in a pharmaceutical lab in Switzerland does not make detailed synth instructions easily available to the average chemist without raising suspicion. Even if you did know the synth in theory, would you really want to risk ruining a perfectly good batch of LSD by trying something very few people had ever done before and you might not even be able to sell afterwards? There was little to no market at the time for ALD-52 because no one had ever tried it and not a lot of people had even heard of it. I could see a chemist making a small batch of it for personal use, but I just can't see the profit in putting it on the street.?????
ALD-52's activity and how to synth it has been well known since the '60ies, when Hoffman made it the first time. I don't think the materials to acetylate LSD is difficult to come by if you already have a lab that can make LSD
And distribution? A clandestine lab that makes LSD already has an underground distribution network. And "there is no market for....."? No market for LSD?Anyway, nevermind.