The Art of the Potentially Deadly Deal: Marketing Heroin on the Street

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
By COLIN MOYNIHAN
Published: June 22, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/23/arts/design/23heroin.html

The empty glassine packets can be found in Manhattan, Brooklyn and beyond, scattered on streets and sidewalks with only obscure slogans or graphic images to suggest their former use. At one time they contained heroin and the markings stamped on the packets were meant to differentiate strains of varying purity or provenance.

To some they are crime evidence. Addicts may see them mainly as a vehicle to fulfill a dangerous urge. For a group of artists who have been collecting them they are cultural artifacts that are equally unsettling and compelling.

On Wednesday a weeklong show called “Heroin Stamp Project” organized by seven members of the Social Art Collective is scheduled to open at the White Box Gallery on Broome Street on the Lower East Side. The show, which will include 150 packets picked off city streets, as well as 12 blown-up prints made from them, is meant to examine the intersection of advertising and addiction and provoke questions about how society addresses dependence and disease.

The origins of the show can be traced to 2001, when Pedro Mateu-Gelabert, a sociologist researching the relationship between H.I.V. and drug use, first glimpsed the packets in an empty building in the Bushwick section of Brooklyn, where addicts would shoot up. Immediately, he said, he was struck by the fact that the images on the glassine envelopes served as advertisements.

“This was the marketing of heroin,” he said on a recent evening as he stood on a corner in Bushwick. “Even something so forbidden, so demonized, can be branded.”

He began collecting the packets and about six years ago he showed them to a friend, Liza Vadnai, who was taken by their combination of menace and fragile beauty. Joined by others, they continued gathering packets with the aim of organizing an exhibition.

Ms. Vadnai, who had counseled drug users in San Francisco before moving to New York, wanted to balance the presentation of the bags as art objects with some consciousness of the devastation caused by the powder they had once held.

“I felt the public health message had to be very clear,” she said as she walked with Mr. Mateu-Gelabert along a stretch of Troutman Street, where the artists had regularly searched for their raw material. “I wasn’t sure how to showcase them without it feeling exploitive.”

Just over 1,800 unstamped packets — the number a heavy heroin user might go through in a year, the show notes — will be arranged in rows on a wall in an effort to make the idea of addiction seem less abstract. Bags typically sell for about $10, Ms. Vadnai said, and may contain anywhere from 30 milligrams of heroin up to a tenth of a gram. Cards bearing facts about the health hazards of injection drug use will also be distributed at the show.

In addition, Ms. Vadnai, Mr. Mateu-Gelabert and their collaborators decided to give some of the show’s proceeds to the Lower East Side Harm Reduction Center, a counseling and needle-exchange organization near the gallery. The collective members said such an organization has more of an impact than groups that simply seek to get drug users to quit.

Heroin users donated some of the packets in the exhibition. Social Art Collective members found others near drug distribution spots and areas where addicts congregate. The artists found packets in the rugged streets of Bushwick and in Mott Haven in the Bronx, and in the gentrifying streets of the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn and the Lower East Side. They picked up packets near the stately brownstones that surround Gramercy Park, and inside Tompkins Square Park, where the trade flourished in the 1980s and into the 90s and still exists.

The stamps that identify the heroin inside draw on a wide range of references. There are names like White Fang, Time Bomb and Monster Power, which is decorated with an image of the grim reaper with a scythe. There are allusions to religion (Deadly Sin and the Last Temptation), crime (Notorious and Outlaw) and publishing (Life, in white capitals against a red background, and Daily News, along with the old camera logo of that tabloid). There is also a packet stamped with the words “Tango and Cash,” the name attached to a fentanyl-laced brand of heroin that infamously caused 12 fatal overdoses in one weekend in 1991.

Several heroin brands seem to dwell on the delicate balance of mortality that accompanies their use. Those include the Last Shot, Game Over, No Exit and No Pain, which is illustrated with a coffin and a cross.

“Many of them are metaphors,” Ms. Vadnai said. “They are saying that the heroin is so strong, so good, it might kill you.”

Mr. Mateu-Gelabert agreed, saying that such names and images were “playing with the edge between life and death.”

While collecting packets, the organizers also conducted a form of ethnographic research, speaking with dealers, users and runners, who serve as intermediaries in a drug sale. One member of the collective, Ashley Jordan, interviewed a man who designed and made rubber stamps that were used to place images on packets.

Those images may not be copyrighted but their creators still have highly proprietary feelings. Earlier this year, Mr. Mateu-Gelabert said, a heroin dealer in Bushwick became upset that another man had appeared on his territory and copied his brand, Too Strong. The first dealer began distributing a new brand, called Shooters — one of those in the show — which featured two revolvers facing each other.

“It was really about sending a message to the dealer who was selling in his neighborhood on his block,” Mr. Mateu-Gelabert said. “It was to convey the message that if you continue messing with our market you will face the guns.”
 
This article pisses me the fuck off.

First of all, 1,800 bags AINT the amount that a "HEAVY" user might use in a year. Thats more like 10,000 bags. 1,800 aint shit. Thats the amount that a baby junkie with a brand new habit might use in a year.

Second, *I* get caught with these bags, and ITS A FUCKIN CRIME! Possession of drug paraphenalia. Do you know how many people i know who been caught with EMPTIES like this, and hit with like, possession of 57 bags of heroin? Fuck!

How come these buji-ass artist wanna be people, can have these drug packaging materials and not get charged , when word is bond, thru out my whole addiction I SAVED THOUSANDS OF EMPTIES FOR THAT EXACT REASON-I WANTED TO DO SOME TYPE OF ART PROJECT OR COLLAGE WITH THEM....And I woulda, NO doubt, got hit with possession charges if they ever got discovered. I had to throw out my collection when i got on paper and my PO started makin visits to my house becuz if he ever had used his right to search my shit i woulda been in trouble, so years of addiction that I had saved stacked away in drawers and shit, got lost. It was like a symbol to me of all the shit I had used, I wanted to use it to do somethin creative, I dont even know exactly but I had a plan , and it was REAL, it was from a REAL junkie, who COPPED those bags on the streets, who USED those bags.

People who want to profit or get some kind of recognition from their fucking "art" projects of using needles or dope bags or crack pipes or fucking watever, make me sick. It makes me want to scream in the face of every one of them , DID YOU SUFFER FOR THIS? This aint YOUR "art", its the by products of my LIFE and you aint got no fucking right to exploit it, like some secret spying stalker shit, peeking in on my life and using its discarded pieces to get attention for YOURSELF--Like you the one whose so cool and understanding about the problem, taking these very real things and turning them into this abstract IDEA instead of the real blood n bones reality of it--Making it into a little fuckin art gallery tea party. Get the fuck outta here, If this "art" got made by some dopehead artist who lost all their spark in the addiction but still managed to create something, a mural of glued on empties, it would get laughed at, just drug addict bullshit.

All those junkie notebooks with stamps carefully pasted on to pages , with ratings, dates, descriptions, like sooo many addicts kept as diaries of their addictions--Those are "ha ha, silly junkie" but it would be ART if these assholes in the story made it.

I dont care if they think the idea is to raise awarenesss--They raising "awareness" thru some exploiting-ass, National Geographic type shit that is more titillating to the audience than really speaking any type of truth to them.

Fuck these people and they way they profit off our pain.
 
People who want to profit or get some kind of recognition from their fucking "art" projects of using needles or dope bags or crack pipes or fucking watever, make me sick. It makes me want to scream in the face of every one of them , DID YOU SUFFER FOR THIS? This aint YOUR "art", its the by products of my LIFE and you aint got no fucking right to exploit it, like some secret spying stalker shit, peeking in on my life and using its discarded pieces to get attention for YOURSELF--Like you the one whose so cool and understanding about the problem, taking these very real things and turning them into this abstract IDEA instead of the real blood n bones reality of it--Making it into a little fuckin art gallery tea party. Get the fuck outta here, If this "art" got made by some dopehead artist who lost all their spark in the addiction but still managed to create something, a mural of glued on empties, it would get laughed at, just drug addict bullshit.
I agree. It seems to be more exploitation than anything else. How many of those bags were actually used by the artists?

I'm not saying you have to live that life to portray it in art, but this is just lazy and unimaginative. Do something more than just displaying the stamps and blowing up a few images of those stamps.
I'd be more impressed if they just showed photographs of discarded stamps and paraphernalia.


At least they're making a donation to a harm reduction organization.
 
Not only that but they used new, non-dope-bag, unstamped bags? WTF is the point of that? Buying a bunch of glassines and putting them on a wall, great, so wat happened to the empties on the street that they had found, now they just using the blank bags and un-imaginatively just pasting them on a sheet and calling it art , damn, its like they took every single thing about this idea that could have possibly been "authentic" and watered it down until it was meaningless.
 
I don't understand your reaction, lacey K.
I really don't see who they are exploiting.
Watering-down the cold, hard truth of reality to serve with tea and biscuits on cute little plates, maybe.
But exploiting?
Their "art" is not hurting anyone.
It is certainly ridiculous that anyone should go to jail for possessing empty (or full) bags of heroin.
But that is not the artists' responsibility.
It sounds like you were treated unfairly by the system.
But that is not the artists' responsibility either.

You said that they didn't suffer for their "art", unlike the addicts who actually used the drugs.
But there is no rule that artists must suffer.
Picasso was rich and had many friends, and created art all his life without any special claim to suffering.
You might not appreciate art without deep suffering involved, but your answer sounded more angry than merely not appreciating their art.


I am not saying that your feelings are wrong, or invalid.
I am interested to understand why you sound so passionate about this.
But, based on the above discussion, I don't understand.
 
Well, if it is European-Americans taking native American artifacts and selling them, it makes me very angry.
If it is European explorers stealing ancient Egyptian mummies from their tombs and refusing to return them to Egypt, it makes me angry.

But I am not sure if I would consider this case to be "stealing". And I don't think that anyone makes much money from art. Certainly not the artist, except in very rare situations.
 
Money is being made somewhere, be it by the artists, the galleries, whoever. They're even donating some of it to an HR organization. I can't imagine someone is making a significant amount off this, but people are getting paid.
 
Yeah im sorry Lacey K but I must disagree. When these bags are being discarded then they are in the public eye for the locals to see. These artist are taking them a step further and placeing them on display for the world to see. To not have something like this out in the open im not sure if its a good idea because that is the world out there and im not comftable with the media (and artist) sugar coating reality. Much like journos in Iraq tapeing marines shooing terrorist and then selling the footage to a news station, the journos arn't the ones suffering but its perfectly ok for them to show the world plus a profit.

Respect lacey k regardless
-static
 
The artists AINT taking them out of the street. They ARE sugar coating it becuz they went and bought brand new , empty, unstamped bags that have never been used to contain heroin, and all they did was glue them on a wall. That aint shit. Its the type of "outsider art" that people fall all over.

They will do shit like take empty plastic baggies , crack stems, needles found in shooting galleries, etc, and then do something to make a "statement" with them and everybodys like Ohhh how deep, and the people whose lives they are taking these artifacts from aint getting none of the credit, attention, or thought--its just about how clever these buji-ass 'artists' are for finding one more thing to exploit.

A great way to compare this is the graffiti scene in the 80's in new york.

It started out as a thing for young kids in the city to do, get out and get up, paintin trains and buildings and everything the eye can see with their form of art, these kids was devoted, on some real shit this was their life.

Soon after Style Wars came out and other graffiti documentaries, galleries started wanting "graffiti."

Soon , a bunch of fakers came in and started painting on canvas, and gettin shit hung up at galleries and gettin paid stupid money for it.

But the people benefitting? They wasnt the original artists.

Not only that, but the ORIGINAL artists, the people who WAS out there, doing the shit in the street that all these crackers decided was so 'hot' still got LOCKED UP and PROSECUTED for the art they doing, and people still look down on the shit thats on a WALL, but its cool if its hanging in some bullshit gallery scene.

It takes a certain type of person to be able to see this type of shit and make something thats real, that hits you in the heart, and the only way that you can do that is if you cant smell the layer of self interest floating off them. In this case it is just another way to get attention at the expense of the people whose lives and habits they are using to make a "shocking" "thought provoking" scene out of.
 
eh. i dont necessarily agree with lacey. but it seems like this shti is like making a mockery of the dope trade. as in no respect for the fact that these dealers make their fucking livelyhoods off selling this shit, hence the violence and all that. lacey did they convict you or whatever just for having bags? how would that stand up in a court of law at all when its just a bag with a name/stamp on it.
 
I been convicted for having actual bags, but I have friends and know plenty of people who been convicted for having emptys. It aint that I am personally angry like "hey i got caught for having bags and they didnt" it aint nothing like that.

It fuckin IRKS me yo, that they are allowed to have a free pass to use these things as however they want and nobody is gonna call them a junkie or try to arrest them. You know, these assholes could be walkin thru the middle of the hood in Newark pickin up empties off the ground in their nice suits and shit and not get hit with charges but I could be walking thru newark for the SAME thing, with a REAL intention to use emptys for a art project and get booked on a possession charge. "for the residue in the bags." real talk, they do it.

I feel that they aint taking it serious and that by takin it out of context like they doing they are taking away how serious it is, and they doing that scientist-looking-at-animals , National geographic discovery channel type of shit, like these researchers looking in at the wild world of junkies! ( 8) )
 
Not only that but they used new, non-dope-bag, unstamped bags? WTF is the point of that? Buying a bunch of glassines and putting them on a wall, great, so wat happened to the empties on the street that they had found, now they just using the blank bags and un-imaginatively just pasting them on a sheet and calling it art , damn, its like they took every single thing about this idea that could have possibly been "authentic" and watered it down until it was meaningless.

not what I expected.... when I read the article and thought of you..
Im thinking "lacey is probably straight pissed the bags didnt get scrapped and prepped into like 10-20 giant shots."
 
Top