grimez is obviously choosing the chairman's comments because they support his position and he likes what he hears.
I know what's coming it's a foregone conclusion. Again, they were illegally wiretapping the entire Trump team. If there was any Russian collusion, do you think they would have let him win?
I blame the media for continuing this charade and hyping all their viewers for so long.
There?s a ton of crimes that happened, a lack of direct evidence doesn?t magically erase the crime.
Bro until you have evidence you are literally pushing conspiracy theories. They even called it Russian "collusion" instead of "conspiracy" because they've tainted that word, even though
collusion is not a crime but
conspiracy is. What crimes happened and how do
you know? To this date Trump has not even been accused of a crime, so I'd like to hear the rap sheet that you got on him. I hope this isn't related to taxes.
Point in case: read HOW TO books. I imagine JG?s primary mode of information consumption is digital-based.
The biggest trove of international cables is wikileaks. And you can read all public available government documents online. But yea I like 2 read teh bookz 2.
OK, so there was no conspiracy, that's a nice change for the types that support trump, there's usually always a conspiracy, but fine, this time there was no conspiracy.
I posted the video detailing the conspiracy. How much do you know about the FISA scandal, have you bothered to look into it?
Why does trump freak out about all this and lash out and try to stop it?
These people were illegally spying on him.
Oh right, because it's a witch hunt... except it's also not
It was always a witch hunt fake news smear hoax. Trump never said it was legitimate.
It's a witch hunt only when it might charge him, when it looks like it won't, it's proof there was no collusion.
See above - always a witch hunt. We're waiting for it to finally wrap up. That doesn't mean there was no collusion, because we're already telling you there was no collusion, it's more like we're just waiting for this waste of time and money circus show to run its course.
Except if it just proves there was no collusion, and was therefore conducted fairly, again, why does trump try to interfere with it.
It hasn't been conducted fairly. It started with illegal surveillance and no corroborated evidence required to launch an investigation. There was no crime committed (for eg Watergate began with a crime). Trump's crime was winning the election. Then Mueller starts locking up Trump's team for BS reasons that you could get almost any politician on, nothing related to election interference or Russian collusion, but enough action to make people think that there's a fire there (but the smoke was all fake or exaggerated).
But this seems very typical for trump supporters. Reality just twists around them.
More like reality catches up to the Trump-haters.
FISAgate exists (so there was a conspiracy after all, I knew it had to be hiding somewhere) because trump says so.
No it's because Dan Bongino says so and we have a ton of evidence.
His collusion does not, because trump says so. And all evidence and logic bends and contorts to that reality.
No lol, it's about evidence. Even if you believe nothing that myself or Trump says, you need some of that sweet evidence.
And the Senate Committee is trying to let y'all down gently.