The crew at WaPo have apparently spent the last 18 months hanging onto Trump's every word. There's obsessed, and then there's batsh*t crazy
Was Trump's tax cut really the "biggest"? Nope. Is the Russia probe a made-up controversy? Not according to
WaPo. I'm glad to know that
they know what Special Counsel Mueller himself does not. It's reassuring. I am also reassured that they have the ability to read minds. Because when Trump says Democrats don't really care about DACA,
WaPo knows he's lying, and that Democrats
really do care about DACA. Or maybe he can just read minds too. I don't know. Because unlike Trump and
WaPo, alas, I cannot read minds.
But wait a second. Something is amiss. I am sure Trump has told more than 3001 lies. But when searching through the
WaPo database, I can find no record of them.
What about that time Trump said Syrian President Assad killed babies with chemical weapons - twice - when Assad most certainly did no such thing? That lie is nowhere to be found in
WaPo's otherwise exceptional list. Even Defense Secretary Mattis admitted there was
no evidence for those claims.
What about those times Trump called Iran the
greatest sponsor of international terrorism, when that benefaction must surely go to U.S. ally Saudi Arabia? Or what about all those lies of omission? What about his refusal to tell the truth about Saudi Arabia or Israel? And what about all those times Trump tells the truth - or something closely approximating it? Like when he calls out regime-change, foreign interventionism, costly useless wars overseas, and anti-Russian hysteria? And
what about all the lies peddled by the FBI, the Democrat and Republican establishments, and the very media of which WaPo is a member?
Is it possible
WaPo is just nitpicking? Is it possible they are holding Trump's feet to the fire for a litany of things that don't matter very much at all, but
opting to remain silent about the actual whoppers Trump tells,
and for which he should truly be held accountable? And choosing to ignore or disagree with all the things he says that actually make sense? No, I must be becoming unreasonably outraged.
WaPo would never do such a thing, and if they were to compile such a list for his predecessors and every other world leader, I am sure they would find them to be paragons of verbal virtue - uttering only pristine truth.
As they do for this Trump 'lie':
"He falsely claimed that Democrats colluded with the Russians, and the whole probe started with "a document that was paid for by the DNC [Democratic National Committee] and Hillary Clinton." But the DNC was a victim of Russian activities, as its emails were hacked and then released via WikiLeaks."
Because the Democrats absolutely did not collude with the Russians -
even when they did. And the DNC absolutely WAS a victim of "Russian activities" (whatever that means) -
even when they weren't. It is clear that
WaPo does not have an agenda here.
So in the spirit of lists, here is a list of things the
WaPo list absolutely is NOT:
- It is not a list of trivial exaggerations and misstatements of fact.
- It is not a list that excludes all the actual lies that happen to matter.
- It is not a list that takes actual truths and counters them by repeating mainstream lies in order to bolster the establishment's own agenda.
- It is not biased in any way whatsoever.
![:\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif "wry grin :\")
