• SPORTS
    AND
    GAMING
  • Sports & Gaming Moderators: ghostfreak

The 2012/2013 NFL Thread v. Brady dont need no money

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Falcons are not really that much better than the one and done versions of previous years.

Seattle should have beaten them last week as well.

Problem is they look a bit better than they are because the NFC is just so piss poor compared to the AFC right now.

SF are a good, well coached team, but Baltimore and New England would both beat them, as could Houston and Possibly Denver.

How can you say the NFC is weak? Packers, 9ers, Seahawks all could have easily gone to the Super Bowl and won and no one would be surprised. If anyone other than NE wins out of the AFC I would have been shocked. (I guess you could include Denver in that list until they obviously lost last week). Falcons look better than they are because they played a weak schedule in a weak division, but they're not in a weak conference.

By the way, the 9ers beat the Pats. So did the Seahawks.
 
How can you say the NFC is weak? Packers, 9ers, Seahawks all could have easily gone to the Super Bowl and won and no one would be surprised. If anyone other than NE wins out of the AFC I would have been shocked. (I guess you could include Denver in that list until they obviously lost last week).

By the way, the 9ers beat the Pats. So did the Seahawks.


Actually this is true, and ok I should revise my opinion, maybe its just those 3 teams that COULD have won the superbowl, I dont think anyone would have taken say Washington or Vikings to win the superbowl as opposed to say the AFC's top 4 teams , all of which could genuinly have been seen as superbowl worthy teams when the playoffs started

But then again I wouldnt say the AFC wild card teams like Cincy or Indy would have won either so its a wash
 
you've been saying it all season long and then packers go one and done again

Funny cos I havent seen you post here all season, but you seem to have come out of the woodwork the last week or so like so many others.
When did I ever say the Packers would win the superbowl? The first time I mentioned it was when they beat Tennesee 55-7 which must have been week 16 !!!
Like I said, maybe learning to read would be a good idea.
 
Actually this is true, and ok I should revise my opinion, maybe its just those 3 teams that COULD have won the superbowl, I dont think anyone would have taken say Washington or Vikings to win the superbowl as opposed to say the AFC's top 4 teams , all of which could genuinly have been seen as superbowl worthy teams when the playoffs started

Texans are pretenders and the Ravens are very good but not great. No way the Texans ever had a shot.

Even if you include the Ravens as a top team, Broncos/Ravens/Pats vs. Packers/Seahawks/9ers is still pretty even. I would still give the edge to the NFC.
 
"In the last nine indoor games, Rodgers’ numbers are out of this world. He has completed 76 percent of his passes and thrown 29 TD passes with just one interception "

"For his career, Rodgers has a 117.0 passer rating in 19 dome starts, so this latest run isn’t just a fluke hot streak. "

Get ready for red hot Aaron in the Superdome for the Superbowl

The Vikes came in winning 4 straight games and GB basically spanked them tonight.
What was their last loss?

To Green Bay on 2nd December at Lambeau

nice prediction man
 
Agreeed, I cant see them winning the AFC

Gonna lay 200 on GB to win the superbowl.


Cant really see anyone beating them, especially as they will probably have to go through a dome and Atlanta and t
he superbowl is played in a dome this year

Aaron Rodgers Dome stats?

Something like 32 td and 1 int in his last 10 games
He is basically superman when playing in a dome

how much did you win?
 
Awesome fake punt with Ryan Mallet in there. That would have been badass if the Ravens didn't get a timeout.
 
silver linings:

HarbaughReacts_original.gif


care: admit my team played yours a lot closer than you thought they would.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top