What 23
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2013
- Messages
- 3,905
But I never sling personal insults. The closest thing I see here, is that "you don't get it" with "fucking" thrown in there, which, you're right, could be left out.
I guess another could be mirroring back the "waste of time" sentiments.
Then, there is also the "annoying" comment. Not that it was a lie. I was annoyed. Still, yea, a problem is my not so good "half" (but its me, not to separate). You are right. I'm better than I have been. Sometimes I gave up. It's a breakdown.
I'm obviously wrong too if I can't communicate, in the way I communicate... If it isn't communicated, it is not communication.
My getting emotional, and more wrong, therefore, is only on me. I concede.
Sorry.
23
I guess another could be mirroring back the "waste of time" sentiments.
Then, there is also the "annoying" comment. Not that it was a lie. I was annoyed. Still, yea, a problem is my not so good "half" (but its me, not to separate). You are right. I'm better than I have been. Sometimes I gave up. It's a breakdown.
I'm obviously wrong too if I can't communicate, in the way I communicate... If it isn't communicated, it is not communication.
My getting emotional, and more wrong, therefore, is only on me. I concede.
Sorry.
23
NSFW:
I just heard that 23 victims have been identified from that massive tornado, in Oklahoma City. Regarding alasdair's billboard comment, this could perhaps be related... Though, I'm still trying to wrap my head around what he meant, because it doesn't really apply the way I think he was getting at. I am not attaching significance here, with this tornado, to "me". I did not. Hearing 23 was not a lot different here than had I heard 45 or any other count. Perhaps I might (take note, other than how I have here) if they were done identifying and only 23 could be identified. Or, if there were only 23 dead. Then maybe I might think something of it, as I heard it. But this is just a billboard/sign/detail on the way. Not that the metaphor sticks, but just to say, I don't "shit my pants" like has been accused, every time I see 23. For you to assume this does makes it very hard to approach this, with you. I want to say it's my fault... But sometimes I wonder if you are even capable of understanding. Maybe it is just like binary or Chinese is to me, "23" to you. Not that it is impossible to learn.
Just to mention, I don't get hexadecimal easily, at all... Or binary. I actually went to school for it. I felt like an idiot. I would get it for a second but it just seemed tedious at the time.
Just to mention, I don't get hexadecimal easily, at all... Or binary. I actually went to school for it. I felt like an idiot. I would get it for a second but it just seemed tedious at the time.
NSFW:
But maybe I missed something, about hearing 23. And maybe I always miss something.
It was the first time that I heard anything about it (tornado), in number, officially- precisely. Though, my dad mentioned it to me yesterday, and said "around 50 people were missing".
Still. I didn't find it notable, at first. Then I asked/I challenged myself. Maybe. But maybe in this instance it is some selection bias/confirmation bias. I may have read something and maybe a number like 46 didn't stand out... Even if it itself is 2x23... Or if it was 54. Maybe I just don't remember because it didn't pop like 23, which just happened to be the first official, precise word of a number I heard about it, to be precise. It's possible, but I remember no numbers. I tend not to focus on it, actually, at first, in these things. I don't want to get the facts until the facts are fully known. They would change too much. It wouldn't be the truth, and I value the truth. But, I might have looked, as I said, and I might have not seen anything "interesting", at the time.
And if my dad had said "something like 23" I admit here that might have taken some precedence..
So... My first reaction to hearing 23 in this instance was just about right. But I tried to test either way.
But it was the first statement of a number that wasn't an rough/round estimate, that I recall, and it kind of stuck out, because of having to leave, with this still on my mind.
I'm more or less comfortable with my "crazy" and sometimes I am just letting it play, but I don't appreciate others assigning that as my end "sum" (and trying to call me invalid), and with calling me irrational, stupid/dense (as you imply, not that I don't struggle), psychotic, or what. Thanks.
It was the first time that I heard anything about it (tornado), in number, officially- precisely. Though, my dad mentioned it to me yesterday, and said "around 50 people were missing".
Still. I didn't find it notable, at first. Then I asked/I challenged myself. Maybe. But maybe in this instance it is some selection bias/confirmation bias. I may have read something and maybe a number like 46 didn't stand out... Even if it itself is 2x23... Or if it was 54. Maybe I just don't remember because it didn't pop like 23, which just happened to be the first official, precise word of a number I heard about it, to be precise. It's possible, but I remember no numbers. I tend not to focus on it, actually, at first, in these things. I don't want to get the facts until the facts are fully known. They would change too much. It wouldn't be the truth, and I value the truth. But, I might have looked, as I said, and I might have not seen anything "interesting", at the time.
And if my dad had said "something like 23" I admit here that might have taken some precedence..
So... My first reaction to hearing 23 in this instance was just about right. But I tried to test either way.
But it was the first statement of a number that wasn't an rough/round estimate, that I recall, and it kind of stuck out, because of having to leave, with this still on my mind.
I'm more or less comfortable with my "crazy" and sometimes I am just letting it play, but I don't appreciate others assigning that as my end "sum" (and trying to call me invalid), and with calling me irrational, stupid/dense (as you imply, not that I don't struggle), psychotic, or what. Thanks.
NSFW:
As I was struggling with how to respond, and say everything here, as I still am currently... In the sky I saw a tiny bird chasing a larger bird/hawk around. First, I was just a little stunned/in wonder. I had never seen that before. The big bird dwarfed the little one. I wondered, a little beyond that... Am I the big bird, or the little bird? I tried to find relation, as I do. I wondered am I that big bird, running from little birds? But I could also be the tiny bird. I could be chasing around the larger. I could be fighting the majority (and in some sense, the accepted), as a minority (non-accepted). Maybe I'm neither, some here might say (as has been demonstrated). Maybe I'm both. Maybe I'm also neither, and both. Maybe I'm also neither, and the small bird, neither and the big bird The big bird and both.. no wait a minute.
And then just now, I wondered... Was that just a baby bird- a youngling, and it's parent? It didn't look like the same species, and I'm not aware of birds teaching their young that way, but I really don't know.
And then just now, I wondered... Was that just a baby bird- a youngling, and it's parent? It didn't look like the same species, and I'm not aware of birds teaching their young that way, but I really don't know.
Last edited: