• 💊 OTHER DRUGS 💊 Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Notable Threads 1 Notable Threads 2
    Dangerous Combos Addiction Support
    Emergency Services Benzo Guide v.1
    Addiction Stories Scary Case Studies
    Biology, Pharmacology & Drugs 101
  • Select Your Topic Then Scroll Down
    Alcohol Bupe Benzos
    Cocaine Heroin Opioids
    RCs Stimulants Misc
    Harm Reduction All Topics Gabapentinoids
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums

Subjective differnence

Q

quale

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
1,064
SO I bet a bunch of ppl here have taken pure d-meth. I want to know if anyone has taken pure l-meth in a similar form and what you thought the difference in effect was. I understant it will be less effective per unit dose and greater heart side effects per dose...but did you find that you could just take more and get meth euphoria or was the experiencly subjectively differnt in charachter. For that matter ritalin as well.
In fact I would also really like to know from ppl who have done meth and amp (hopefully sig amounts of each to lower error) other then the greater physical side effects with amphetamine did it feel differnt/less euphoric?
 
I couldn't tell you if I've taken both d-meth and l-meth. So I'll skip to the bottom.
In fact I would also really like to know from ppl who have done meth and amp (hopefully sig amounts of each to lower error) other then the greater physical side effects with amphetamine did it feel differnt/less euphoric?
The only pharmaceutical amphetamine I've had is Adderall, which isn't impressive.
But I've had pure amphetamine tablets sold to me as ecstasy before. They were actually remarkably close in effects to ecstasy. I experienced a lot of euphoria and empathy without ever rolling. I thought it was by far more euphoric than meth and I'd love to do it again. But I doubt I'd ever do meth again
Click to expand...
 
The standard meth synths all start from enantiomerically pure ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, and so yield only d-methamphetamine: this is street meth. I doubt many people have done l-meth.
 
P2P makes racemic dl-methamphetamine.... l-methampetamine isn't active at all, and you can go ahead and take one of those vics inhalers that have it in it. You can't easily convert it to d-methamphetamine with any kind of good yeilds, so l-methamphetamine is completly and totaly useless. Because of this reason the P2P synth is not used anymore, basicly 50% of your product is good 50% of it is shit... All the synths used today make 100% d-methamphetamine. Like I said, if you want to try l-methamphetamine so bad just extract some from a vics inhaler, it doesn't do anything for you.
 
Alright, don't laugh - but yes, back when I was about 17 I found the "Vicks synth" .. we perfected it and yeilded some nice, crunchy crystas 0 this would be pure L-meht (we even washed lightly - to the point the menthol smell was barely existant) ...
You want the honest to god truth? If you compared it to some "average crank" (NOT GLASS OR HIGH GRADE METH!) I bet most of you could NOT tell the difference.. you get amped (mild, very mild, this is true) .. but it does give you a decent burst of energy... so if you're ever bored, go ahead and do the Vicks extraction (it's been re-written and that re-write has good directions for further purification) .. it would DEFINITLY make a good cut!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top