Study: More Than Half of Adult Male Arrestees Test Positive for at Least One Drug

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
Follow R. Gil Kerlikowske on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ONDCP

. . .

Here are what the facts show. Drug use and related crime strain the resources of this country. The latest evidence comes from the 2011 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Annual Report (ADAM II), released today, which tests for drugs in adult males arrested for a wide variety of crimes in 10 sites across the country. This study found a majority of adult males arrested for crimes tested positive for an illegal drug at the time of their arrest. In fact, positive drug tests among arrestees ranged from 64 percent in Atlanta, GA, to 81 percent in Sacramento, CA.

These data were obtained from individuals booked for all types of crimes, from misdemeanors to felonies, and not just those arrested on drug charges. The ADAM program tests only for drugs marijuana, cocaine, opiates (including heroin and prescription pain relievers), amphetamines/methamphetamine, Darvon, PCP, benzodiazepines, methadone, and barbiturates -- not alcohol.

This report highlights the urgent need for institutions at the federal, state, and local level to come together to support proven reforms that work to break the vicious cycle of drug use, crime, incarceration and re-arrest. It's a cycle my colleagues and I are committed to breaking because we care about the health and safety of our fellow citizens, our healthcare system, and our economy.

. . .

The 2011 ADAM II findings are clear evidence of the link between drugs and crime. Too often, underlying substance use disorders are the driving force behind criminal activity. It is imperative, then, that we address our nation's drug problem not just as a criminal justice issue but as a public health issue. We cannot arrest our way out of the drug problem. What we need are evidence-based reforms that break the cycle of drug use and crime, reduce recidivism, and make our communities healthier and safer.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/r-gil-kerlikowske/arrestee-drug-use_b_1525397.html
 
More than half of arrest are going to be drug related which makes 100% of that group test positive plus the % of other arrest that will test positive. Its not correlation with so many variables. We have a higher % of drug users in jail because drug use is considered a crime.

If you wanted sound numbers then only test the ones without a drug charge. Even then it would become more philosophical why that number was higher (if it is) whether it was driven by crime/drug use correlation, if its because police presence in ghettos, or a host of other reasons.
 
If you turn drug users into criminals then of course a large number of the criminals you arrest are going to be drug users... is he as fucking stupid as this article makes him sound?

It's interesting to see him use anti-prohibitionist terminology:

Our policies reject both these extremes in favor of a "third way" to approach drug control.

The foundation of this "third way" approach is peer-reviewed, scientific research that provides us insight into the disease of addiction and a roadmap on how to prevent and treat it. The "third way" approach deals in facts -- not dogma -- and relies on research -- not ideology.

etc. when American policy is really just a continuation of more of the same.
 
I always find that studies that lead to this conclusion essentially prove the point that the drug war is not working, rather than the other way around. The fact that a person uses drugs does not necessarily put them at a greater risk of committing crimes than abstainers. It is more related to the person's lifestyle, socioeconomic status, cost of drugs, and the cost of addiction that make for the correlation. I am almost certain that if a study could take in account these variables, there would be little correlation between illegal drug usage and crime. Of course, alcohol is correlated with crime so there is certainly something to be said for the pharmacological aspects of a drug leading to a increased disposition towards criminality. However, then the argument can be situated onto why is alcohol legal and other drugs not. In the end, this study is of course being used for propaganda purposes, but it just does not sit right with me that these conclusions can be so rashly drawn up from what is indubitable a incomplete picture. I suppose that really is what the drug war is in the end though.
 
"I kind of see what he means. Every time I smoke weed I grab the MAC-10 and look for houses to loot."

Lol

205.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top