• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio

Stimulants of the Future II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reactivan (fencamfamine) "more an analeptic than an amphetamine"

Not sure what that's supposed to mean as all stimulants are by definition analeptics. Anyway fencamfamine is more amphetamine loke in action than things like methylphenidate as it causdes dopamine efflux as well as inhibiting reuptake

Cypenamine is a central stimulant (it's basically fencamfamine with a ring system missing (and an N-ethyl group!). Zylofuramine looks like a bloody good bet - no anorexia, no hyperthermia and only weak cardiovascular effects, a 'pure' stimulant. Where do I sign up for some? :D
 
"alpha-Benzyltetrahydrofurfurylamines--a new series in psychomotor stimulants. III. Pharmacology of D-threo-alpha-benzyl-N-ethyltetrahydrofurfurylamine (zylofuramine)."
Harris, L. S.; Clarke, R. L.; Dembinski, J. R.
Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Therapie 1963, 146(3-4), pp.392-405
Abstract
Some pharmacol. effects of zylofuramine (I) are described and compared with those of amphetamine (II). I was more potent than II in its ability to stimulate the spontaneous activity of mice. The threshold activity for an orally administered dose was 2.0 mg./kg. for both, but I had a more pronounced effect. The 60% redn. of activity produced in mice by intraperitoneal administration of chlorpromazine (III) (3.0 mg./kg.) was completely reversed by 4.0 mg./kg. of I, administered orally. Overt behavior studies in cats and monkeys also indicated that I was an active central nervous system stimulant, 25% as active as II. Good stimulation was observed over a dose range of 2-32 mg./kg. in both species, whereas II stimulated the monkey over a narrow range (0.5-2.0 mg./kg.) and was toxic. The effects of I on the cardiovascular system are very mild. In the anesthetized dog, a slight transient pressor response was obtained at low doses, which was converted to a depressor response when the doses were increased. In the vagotomized dog, 0.1 mg./kg. of II produced a greater pressor effect than 1.0 mg./kg. of I. In unanesthetized dogs, oral doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg./kg. of I produced a slight pressor response, a slight depressor response occurred at higher doses. II (0.3 and 0.6 mg./kg.) produced a marked increase in systolic and diastolic pressure, and a decrease in heart rate. In the cat, doses of 0.5 and 1.0 mg./kg. of I produced electrographic alerting, which was unaccompanied by be- havioral changes. The latter could be obtained by doses of 2.0-6.0 mg./kg. The activity was 50% that of II, and was counteracted by III. The L.D.50 doses to mice were: for I, 32 and 475 mg./kg. and for II, 15 and 90 mg./kg. by intravenous and oral administration, resp. I was not a monoamine oxidase inhibitor and did not block .beta.-hydroxylase. The blood glucose level of fasted rats was unchanged after administration of large doses of the drug andit had no effect on body temp.
Looks that this journal is not available online. Bullshit!
It's quite strange that there is hardly any follow-up publication on this one. Why? If toxicity is indeed lower than amphetamine's, this (class of) compound(s) would be very desirable.

Cheers! Murphy
 
I am pretty sure you can't just slam some structures together for drugs you like and expect them to work - hell, you probably couldn't tell me which precursors you would need or which reagents would be used to actually create the drugs.

This all seems like amateur, empty speculation by a variety of individuals with a deeply flawed understanding of bio- and organic chemistry
 
hell, you probably couldn't tell me which precursors you would need or which reagents would be used to actually create the drugs.

This all seems like amateur, empty speculation by a variety of individuals with a deeply flawed understanding of bio- and organic chemistry

You would eat those words if you really knew. Organic chem isn't some impossible to understand subject. Hell, I did a degree in my 40s. If the starting materials are available, the chemistry involved in synthesising many of the phenethylamines is relatively simple.
 
I wonder if any good analogs can be made out of the tert-butyl amine of cathinone.

Clearly this is the structure of bupropion without the chlorine there.

Under normal circumstances substitution into the para position of the phenyl nucleus would be considered a suicidal choice of thing to do.

I wonder here though, if the effect of the tert-butyl is to completely block any 5-HTergic activity.

If this is indeed the case then what would the following be like?

bupropionanalog.png
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bupropion#Pharmacokinetics

It does not appear that is one of the metabolites. Would the plain phenyl ring be a weaker or stronger stimulant compound than bupropion? I also realize these compounds are very similar in structure to clenbuterol which is extremely potent. The p-fluoro analog could also be interesting but I would want to know what I am getting before attempting any sort of dubious synth. It seems manifaxine was the newer generation analog they tried introducing. Then salbutamol does not look massively dissimilar from a methylenedioxy group if one cares to consider that as a possible analog.

Maybe a p-bromo anlog? Im just rambling although it does interest me if there is anything of value here that offers an improvement over bup.
 
Last edited:
bupropionanalog.png


I think this compound would be very neurotoxic just like Parachloroamphetamine:

para-Chloroamphetamine (PCA), or 4-chloroamphetamine (4-CA), is an amphetamine derivative and monoamine releaser similar to MDMA, but with substantially higher neurotoxicity, thought to be due to the unrestrained release of both serotonin and dopamine as with MDMA itself.[1] It is used as a neurotoxin by neurobiologists to selectively kill serotonergic neurons for research purposes, in the same way that 6-hydroxydopamine is used to kill dopaminergic neurons.[2][3][


EDIT:

But what about:

n-methyl_phenylalanine47.png
 
3.5.1. 4-Chlorophenylisopropylamine

The simplest of the halogenated phenylisopropylamines is 4-chlorophenylisopropylamine (79, para-chloroamphetamine, 4-CA). It and the N-methyl homolog (80) are highly active compounds in experimental animals, producing a remarkably long-lasting depletion of brain serotonin levels (Pletscher et al., 1963) and a decrease in tryptophane hydroxylase activity (Sanders-Bush et al., 1972).

Considerable clinical application of 4-CA has been made, and it has been found effective as an antidepressant when used chronically at levels of 75 mg/day (van Praag et al., 1971; van Praag and Korf, 1976). There are very few side effects noted and the drug is tolerated very well. However, indications of raphe-nucleus degeneration (Yunger et al., 1974) and related neurotoxicity (Harvey and McMaster, 1976) in experimental animals have discouraged further clinical study.

An unusual aspect of 4-CA metabolism is the reported conversion of the drug to oxygen-containing products. A phenolic product was identified by Parli and Schmidt (1975) as being 3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenylisopropylamine. This would seem to invoke the NIH shift as an explanation for the migration of the chloro atom. Even more remarkable is the report (Sherman and Gal, 1976) of the isolation of 3,4-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine following the intraventricular injection of 4-CA. This represents the formation in vivo of a weak but accepted pressor and psychotomimetic. When the mechanism of its formation is understood, a chemical link may be at hand tying the simpler phenylisopropylamine stimulants to the methoxylated psychotomimetics. There were no reports from the clinical studies of 4-CA that suggested any psychotomimetic action.

3.5.2. 4-Chloro-N-methylphenylisopropylamine

The N-methyl homolog of 4-chlorophenylisopropylamine (80, para-chloromethamphetamine p-CMA, Ro 4-6861, S-33) was also found to be a potent and long-lasting depleter of brain serotonin (Fuller et al., 1965). It has been compared with methamphetamine in normal subjects (Verster and van Praag, 1970) and has been evaluated clinically in comparison with 4-CA (79) as an antidepressant (Deniker et al., 1971; van Praag et al., 1971; van Praag and Korf, 1976). Typical dosages were between 60 and 90 mg/day, administered chronically for several weeks. There appeared to be no physical or psychic dependence developed, no cardiovascular complications, and no sleep or appetite problems. There was no mention made of mental disturbances that might be considered psychotomimetic.

The alpha,alpha-dimethylphenylethylamine homologs of p-CMA have been explored clinicaly as anorexics. 4-Chloro-alpha-alpha-dimethylphenethylamine is used therapeutically under the name of Chlorphentermine; the ortho-isomer is known as Clortermine.

3.5.3. 4-Bromo-N-methylphenylisopropylamine

The bromo-counterparts of the chlorophenylisopropylamine have been studied, but have not found extensive clinical evaluation. The primary amine 4-bromophenylisopropylamine (4-bromoamphetamine) is, like the 4-chloro-analog 4-CA (79), a long-term depleter of serotonin in the brain (Fuller et al. (1975). The 4-fluoro analog, while still effective biochemically, is not of as long a duration of action. The N-methyl homolog of 4-bromo-phenylisopropylamine has demanded interest from a separate point of view, however. This compound, 4-bromo-N-methylphenylisopropylamine (81, V-111, p-bromomethamphetamine), has been found to give pharmacological profiles in a large number of animal species, which are indistinguishable from those shown by LSD and other psychotomimetics (Knoll et al., 1970). Although much of the literature appearing over the period from 1965 to 1975 refers to (81) as a psychotomimetic, it had apparently never been clinically assayed in man. It is now known that the compound "has no psychotomimetic effect whatsoever in humans" (Knoll, 1974, personal communication). The high pharmacological potency of (V-111) in the biochemistry of serotonin and its apparent enhancement of learning and memory in experimental animals have maintained an active interest in it in the research area.

http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/shulgin.pea.sar.hop.html#35
 
I remember someone saying back in the days of the hive, that N-t-butylcathinone was a good stimulant.
 
that could make sense. I woud call on the analogy of Bontril that it does no become active until it is N-dealkylated.

Well spotted friend. That could be a useful observation worthy of credit.

I just remembered that the t-Bu is not expected to become dealkylated unlike eg the N-ethyl of diethylpropion.

My knowledge is not that good but it looks like it could be worth a trial.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top