• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

So, do foreskins turn you off?

Status
Not open for further replies.
DrunkardsDream said:
So you are pro genital mutilation big surprise. Getting an infant boy's foreskin involuntarily removed is akin to a female circumcision.
Click to expand...

OK, well then I guess my male son will never know happiness because of the three seconds of pain he endured when he was an infant. If something like that weighs so heavily on his mind that it affects him in any way, then I've failed as a parent.
 
DrunkardsDream said:
Actually there are a lot of men who are not happy that we were cut at birth and had our foreskin removed without our consent. I have read posts here on bluelight from guys who are cut who wish they were not.
Click to expand...

That's not saying much given the high proportion of retarded and daddy issues that this place attracts.
 
tackyspiral said:
that is a little bit unfair.... It is common practice to do this in the US, its cleaner, and he might get made fun of in the locker room

besides he is also part jewish (i know thats not a real reason because you cant really be part but hey...)
Click to expand...


Get made fun of in the locker room for having a uncut penis? Seriously? That shit just does not happen. Your are more likely to get made fun of for looking at some kids dick in the locker room than getting made fun of because your dick is uncut or cut. Also in America I believe that the number of uncut to cut really isn't that big of a difference. I thought I saw some stats years ago that looked some what like this "60 cut, 40 uncut", I could be off a little bit, but even still it isn't that uncommon to be uncut in the USA.


I'm uncut and never had any issues. No girls gave a shit, no guys gave me any shit for it.
 
That would have to be one large cock to construct a couple of B cups out off. A foreskin that big would probably make a pretty purse to match.
 
I had a partial circumcision at 19 (26 now), but that was out of necessity - my foreskin stopped retracting. Took a while to heal, kept popping the stitches cause my partner and I were crazy hot for each other at the time, so I just had to grit my teeth. She found it hot. :)

A.
 
circumcision is fucking weird. I don't understand why it is common practise in the US to cut off part of your babys penis. wtf
 
Pagey said:
Yeah I'm curious as to why it's so big in the US. I thought it was just a religious thing?
Click to expand...

Research it. It was started in the United States because 100+ years ago they thought that if a man or anyone had sexual pleasure that it was bad, and it was done to reduce masturbation and sexual pleasure.
 
DrunkardsDream said:
Of course he is not going to think he's missing anything he had no choice in getting his genitals mutilated and he's never experienced having a foreskin and probably never had sex with a man who has a foreskin either sucking off a guy, stroking his dick, or bottoming.

A guy that's cut saying he's not missing anything is akin to someone who has had a lobotomy or ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) claiming they are not brain damaged at all.

A dick that's cut is no more "Clean" than a vagina or penis that is completely unmutilated and is fully functioning. It does not matter if someone is cut or not when it comes to cleanliness. What matters is if they practice basic hygiene and wash with soap and water daily. I have been with guys who are cut who had nasty smelling dicks because they thought they did not need to wash daily since they were cut. We did not have sex.

Circumcision of infant boys is child molestation.
Click to expand...

While I don't support the practice unless it's done for essential medical reasons I had it done for just that when I was 30 in the military due to a problem when out in a tropical region on an exercise for an extended period, and am probably one of the few males that can speak with experience on the feeling of sex before and after having it done, and I can say without hesitation that I have found no difference in either sensitivity or sexual performance after having it done. It took me only a few weeks from the time I had the op to when I was functioning as before. If anything I noticed an increased level of sensitivity initially.

In a general sense, i'm surprised that so many people have a view on sensitivity when they have no experience with it and are just speaking from a perception. I'm sure that some people would notice a drop in sensitivity or sexual function but that could be attributed to a number of other variables such as stress, hormonal changes, cardiovascular problems, over use of benzo's or other drugs - you name it, there is a list that goes on for males with performance issues. It would be an interesting scientific study to get enough of a sample of males to accurately compare whether circumcision in itself minus those other variables did affect sensitivity or performance, however I can only speak from my own personal experience.
 
^ With all due respect, the sensitivity issue has to do with wear and tear on the head that occurs over a lifetime of exposure. Grown adults who get cut don't count because they haven't had to grow up with the foreskin absent. Talk to us in 20 years. The glans is not meant to be exposed permanently, nature did not design it that way.

Secondly, most people's issue with circumcision is the lack of choice or consent that can be offered to a baby. You choose to have it cut off, a choice that is perfectly fine, although I find it odd that you felt the need to get cut to prepare for the tropics when most people living in the tropics are uncut and just fine. Anyway, doing it to a baby that can't say no is a different story.

Third, I'm a gay man so cock is my business. Uncut guys are almost always more sensitive than cut ones. Most uncut guys can't handle the kinds of direct head stimulation that cut guys NEED to get off.
 
Pagey said:
Yeah I'm curious as to why it's so big in the US. I thought it was just a religious thing?
Click to expand...

"Circumcision started as early as 5000 BC and was likely practiced first by the Hebrews or the Egyptians.

The first records there are of circumcision come from the ancient Egyptians the Jews copied it from them."

There. I actually did some correct research on the matter. So, no...it didn't begin in the US.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top