You can't take 10 cases and conclude that 9 or 10 of those are smokers.
wait you said it twice in your post, there seems to be some misunderstanding...I'm saying that you read 10 synopsis of a meth career gone wrong, and in those, a majority of them will be either smokers or IVers.
I never said to select 10 cases of meth careers gone wrong, which detail nothing about how they are consumed...that makes no sense at all and is not worth a second of thought, and I can't believe you would think anybody would make such a weak argument?
What I am saying is that methamphetamine can have a drastically negative effect on a young persons life because of lack of control and the mortality of human will. Taking it orally, and having a good life plan incorporating it, if this is what the person has chosen to do, will be much more successful if it is taken orally, and maybe snorting on special occasions to save the nose pain.
I never said that there were 80yo narcoleptics who have smoked and IV'd solvents and undetermined by-products.
In this thread I've gone over several things over and over without comprehension. Just re-wording what I said in the first place. The oh but I still find smoking more pleasurable was rediculous, completely missed the gist.
Wait wait, have you guys done a unit or class talking about probability in maths at school yet? That could be the missing link, and that isn't an insult, this just doesn't make sense.