Because my mate read that "a" dude off youtube mentioned he got high off smoking ciggies dipped in LSD.why a person would need to take LSD anyway besides sublingually/orally is beyond me
smoking it sounds like a serious waste of product
Because my mate read that "a" dude off youtube mentioned he got high off smoking ciggies dipped in LSD.why a person would need to take LSD anyway besides sublingually/orally is beyond me
smoking it sounds like a serious waste of product
you probably have an IQ of 36 then.
I used to get drops of liquid LSD put in my eye, same with blotter, i still sometimes put 2 tabs on each eyeball.
Don't listen to all of the bullshit warnings about LSD
it doesn't fry your brain, it doesn't make you go insane, it wont poison you, ect ect ect
I'm living proof of all of this.
But I do not suggest putting LSD drops in your eye, or even blotter as I heard it's not healthy to get on your pupil.
Be safe and happy tripping
i find smoking LSD eliminates almost all of the side effects
you probably have an IQ of 36 then.
but throw some Oxy in there for good measure.
1. The heat will destroy it.
2. Even if the heat did not, enough LSD would probably wastefully drift off into the air that you would need a relatively large mass of it to get enough into you.
A solution of liquid LSD makes sense to put in your eye (although it sounds potentially painful and very wasteful if you do not get it exactly in your eye), but why the hell would you put a piece of paper in your eye?
Wont work. The heat will inherently destory the lsd.
I dont really understand why people are always comming up with elaborate and unnecessary ways to take their drugs, especially something as simple as lsd.
id imagine it suck worse having paper in yr eye than having just liquid. what motivates this method of administration??
The reason for this is I have actually timed how long it takes for the effects to kick in and I have no idea why but the eye seems to work best.