Should the Victims of the War on Drugs Receive Reparations?

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
32,760
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
Should the Victims of the War on Drugs Receive Reparations?
BY HELEN REDMOND • October 31, 2014

A drug war Truth and Reconciliation Commission along the lines of post-apartheid South Africa is a radical idea proposed by the Green Party. Substance.com asks their candidates for New York State’s gubernatorial election to tell us more.

In November’s gubernatorial election in New York State, Green Party candidates Howie Hawkins and Brian Jones are running against Democratic incumbent Andrew Cuomo, who won his party’s primary. Hawkins and Jones are seeking to become the next governor and lieutenant governor respectively.

They’re hardly your typical politicians. Hawkins works at UPS in Albany, unloading trucks, and is a member of the Teamster’s union, while Jones is a teacher who taught for nine years in the New York City public school system.

Hawkins and Jones understand that winning is a long shot, to say the least. A recent NBC 4 New York poll showed Hawkins getting just seven percent of the vote. Still, taking a longer view, siphoning away a proportion of the main parties’ voters can be a way to get them to shift their policies in your direction. And the Greens have long argued that building an alternative to the two-party system is crucial because Republicans and Democrats represent the interests of their wealthy corporate donors. The top industries that donate to Governor Cuomo’s campaign are finance, insurance, and real estate, while the Green Party portrays itself as a party for working people, and doesn’t accept contributions from corporations. “The richest one percent own the two major parties,” Hawkins says.

One area in which the Green Party platform differs radically from that of the Democrats is the war on drugs. So Substance.com spoke with both candidates to get their take on issues like mass incarceration, the racial disparities of drug-law enforcement, the legalization of heroin and other drugs—and what could happen after that.

How has the war on drugs impacted communities—particularly communities of color—in New York State under Governor Andrew Cuomo and former mayor Michael Bloomberg?

HAWKINS: Cuomo is a drug warrior and mass incarcerator. He has been silently complicit in the drug war, first as attorney general and then as governor—as Bloomberg and [former NYPD Commissioner] Kelly stop-and-frisk and now Mayor de Blasio and [NYPD Commissioner] Bill “broken windows” Bratton target poor communities of color for petty offenses, particularly marijuana possession.

The war on drugs hasn’t reduced substance abuse, but has created a culture of violence fueled by profits from the drug trade, similar to the crime wave that accompanied the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s.

Despite decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana four decades ago, New York State leads the country in marijuana arrests. The greatest racial disparities occur in Brooklyn and Manhattan, where black New Yorkers are over nine times more likely than whites to be arrested for possessing marijuana.

JONES: It has been devastating. According to the New York Civil Liberties Union, the black arrest rate for marijuana has increased 26 percent since 2001. So under the watch of Cuomo and Bloomberg, the war on drugs has intensified. We are now at a point where some 50,000 people in New York State are snatched off the streets every year for this reason alone. And as we know, once these folks are saddled with a criminal record, they effectively become second-class citizens because it’s legal to discriminate against them.

The New York Times came out recently in favor of the legalization of marijuana. What’s your reaction to the new position of the “paper of record”?

HAWKINS: What took the Times so long? It is time for New York to also legalize, regulate, and tax recreational marijuana as Colorado and Washington State now do.

JONES: Better late than never. The New York Times can tell which way the wind is blowing, but has not gotten out in front on these issues.

You favor legalizing and regulating both marijuana and heroin. Do you have any concern that legal regulation could lead to an increase in the use of these drugs?

HAWKINS: Cuomo says marijuana is a gateway drug to hard drugs, but he is pandering to a public opinion cultivated by decades of drug war propaganda. Where marijuana and heroin have been decriminalized or legalized in countries like the Czech Republic, Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, and Uruguay, both marijuana and hard drug use have declined.


continued here http://www.psmag.com/navigation/health-and-behavior/victims-war-drugs-receive-reparations-93194/
 
Legalize cannabis, and keep Alcohol legal IMO
Also legalize psychedelic therapy in approved clinical settings. Psilocybin, LSD, and such.
And start building "heroin houses" in the US like they are in Canada. Where addicts can get free clean syringes and a safe place to shoot up off the streets.
But don't sell them the heroin, that would just exacerbate the problem. heroin should still be hard/risky to get so law-abiding citizens don't end up trying it (i.e they don't want to break the law)
Finally, increase Pretrial Diversion program options to keep people out of jail for first-time possession charges and this lets them get help and avoid convictions. Also gives WAY MORE incentive to stop using (by holding a suspended sentence)
 
I'm certainly glad your not, even if some of the ideas might be a big step in the right direction.

TRCs have limits. I'm with ^^ on simply decriminalizing drug use, possession and wiping clean anyone with a related felony. That in and of itself seems infinitely more reasonable than repatriations or a TRC. Frankly, in terms of the US, I'd say we need a TRC regarding Slavery and it's ilk more than one regarding the WOD - or at least, as unrealistic as even the former is, it's more realistic than the latter.

And btw, Without Sanctuary is work checking out regardless of this thread. Just wanted to mention that %)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Atta boy! Couldn't have put it more succinctly myself :)

However nice a fatasy it may be, that's all it is. Getting laws passed like Prop 47 passed in LA/CA is much, much more reasonable, however impotent it may be alone. Which, I guess, is why it's important finding ways of actually achieving our goals rather than just dreaming about the end result.

I mean, TRC would only really be even feasible only once the WOD has ended. Like how it is done with every TRC that has ever existed before (Rawanda, South Africa, etc. etc.), no matter how effective they might have been - they just don't work until the underlying conflict have been righted on some official level (see South Africa).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top