• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

Should the government decriminalize drugs? SMH Panel @ Sydney University, LIVE STREAM

thanks.

"A million australians will sniff something, pop something, inject something- this week." David Marr

#drugdilemma (on twitter)
 
Last edited:
watching now, extremely sensible people putting taboos aside to address this in a way that benefits both users AND non users.

The unfortunate hurdle is educating the hard line anti-drug crusaders as they are unwavering in their views, in part due to some tragedy thats effected them, or a general ignorance thats born through the refusal to see both sides of this "war" that claims more lives than the drugs themselves do.

Great post Poledriver!
 
Two things I'd like to see addressed is the comparison between illegal drugs and legal drugs (alcohol/tobacco) and the effect a century of propoganda has had on peoples opinions about drug use and drug laws.
 
Australia trends · Change
#Gottagetout
#StupidThingsPeopleDo
Adele or Maroon 5
#drugdilemma
Peter Gilmore
My Dream Place
Bee Gees
Kathy Jackson
Robin Gibb
Pauline Hanson

Have your say on twitter -
#drugdilemma

So many views and thoughts on there.
 
Thank you so much for this link, I am really enjoying this discussion - good to see David Marr in action again! My fuck I despise Gary Christian though. What a horrible man.
 
^Agreed.

Marr and Wodak are coming across great-

Wodak: I just cannot understand how a civilized country cannot allow people dying of AIDS or cancer 2use cannabis #drugdilemma

#drugdilemma
 
Who is going to produce drugs if they become legalized? Will bikies have to get official accreditation to do it? #drugdilemma

Marr: we already have an up and running opium industry in Tasmania #drugdilemma

Wodak: nobody wants to see 1kg blocks of pure heroin sold at the supermarket counter #drugdilemma

lol
 
Yes, loving Wodak's contributions as well. This panel certainly seems to be stacked in my favour, but fortunately they are all intelligent, articulate individuals.
 
aww she feels very much for gary who is outnumbered 5 to 1 in this biased debate.

LOL... She swore. (and u did) lol.
 
Damn I only caught the last twenty minutes. It sounded like most people attending the discussion were pro de-criminalization, is that right?

Excellent post, cheers. Does anyone know if its possible to get the recording of this?
 
Fuck, I'd give those bitches some tough love. On a more serious note, that was great although it would have been better to have more than 1 anti-drug douche on the panel, even if just to laugh at/pick holes in the arguments of more than 1 person. Although they would have all probably been Christians, and said the same thing with their godly knowledge. I go back to the Bible, in passage John 1:13b when some wanker said some general shit and I love Jesus.
 
Claims war is over draw new lines in divisive battle

Claims war is over draw new lines in divisive battle

''PLAN A clearly doesn't work, we should discuss the options for Plan B.'' The words of Dr Alex Wodak, the president of the Australian Drug Law Reform Foundation, set the tone for a robust public forum on drug decriminalisation last night, hosted by the Herald's publisher and editor-in-chief, Peter Fray, at the University of Sydney.

More than 200 people gathered for the forum. Many were drawn to the discussion because they had not made up their minds on decriminalisation.

Most of the experts on the panel were in favour of decriminalisation, though a Herald/Nielsen poll found two-thirds of Australians opposed it.

Tony Trimingham, the chief executive of Family Drug Support, said he was a drugs ''agnostic'' until his 23-year-old son, Damien, died of a heroin overdose in 1997. Mr Trimingham said he believed in decriminalisation and would ''fight to the day I die to bring about these reforms''.

''I speak for the 9000 young Australians who died since Damien's death. Nine thousand, that's a national disgrace. Families don't support, condone or promote drug use; we would far rather they gave up using. However reality teaches us that people do make foolish choices.''

He had seen drug addicts go on to live successful lives, including a woman who had overdosed 14 times who ended up studying medicine, and they had to have the right to live. ''All of them have a right to health, treatment, wellbeing and human rights. Remember, we're taking about people. We're talking about our sons, our daughters and sisters and our brothers.''

Dr Wodak said research showed present drug policy was not stemming supply, with 2011 data indicating the vast majority of drug users found hydroponic cannabis and heroin easy or very easy to obtain. ''Drugs should be redefined as … a health and social issue,'' he said.

Dr Wodak is a board member of Australia21, a group of experts and high-profile citizens who have declared the ''war on drugs'' a failed policy and called for a debate on new directions.

Gary Christian, the secretary and research director at Drug Free Australia, spoke against decriminalisation. He said only 6 per cent of the world's population used illegal drugs.
''Why would we legalise something for such a tiny minority?'' he said.

He said Australia had never had a war on drugs, citing the existence of injecting rooms.

''We have blitzes on drink driving which have failed to eradicate it, but we don't say we're going to legalise it now. [It's] exactly the same with drugs - the police work to contain the behaviour.''
The senior Herald writer and author of Panic, David Marr, said politicians ''ran for the hills'' when Australia21 made its declaration.

''Here we have this great political issue that no political party is at the moment willing to touch,'' he said.​

http://www.smh.com.au/national/heal...-lines-in-divisive-battle-20120521-1z1fi.html
 
that was great although it would have been better to have more than 1 anti-drug douche on the panel, even if just to laugh at/pick holes in the arguments of more than 1 person

Yeah true, it could have been a bit more level. I think someone on the panel mentioned they might try and organise another debate in 3, 6 or 12 mnths with a few more people from the 'anti-drug douches' side.
 
Top