Scotland - Allan Massie: Legalise drugs to win the war

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
The Scotsman

Allan Massie
Wednesday 28th May 2014

With reader comments

Decriminalisation would allow the state to set manufacturing standards and collect taxes, writes Allan Massie

Every week, people appear in sheriff courts all over Scotland charged with drug offences. Sometimes they are in possession of drugs for their own use. Sometimes they are charged with supplying them to others, often acquaintances, friends or members of their own family. They are, I suppose, dealers, if only in a small way, though they may also have closer connections to organised drug crime, which is, after all, a big and profitable business.

Occasionally a big shot is arrested. Assets are seized and charities, sports clubs etc may benefit from the distribution by the state of the profits of crime. Most of those who come up before the courts seem, however, to be small fry, often the smallest of small fry. They acquire a criminal record because possession of certain named drugs is illegal.

Vast numbers of people – hundreds of thousands, millions probably – habitually or occasionally use these same drugs, but are fortunate enough not to be arrested and charged with possession. Everybody knows that drug use is common, that, for instance, City traders snort cocaine and drugs are passed round the table at dinner parties. Newspaper columnists write of their own drug use, and do so with impunity. The vast majority of drug users , at all levels of society, shrug their shoulders at the law, which they probably regard as ridiculous, if also potentially oppressive.

More...
http://www.scotsman.com/news/allan-massie-legalise-drugs-to-win-the-war-1-3424485
 
Allan Johnstone Massie CBE (born 1938) is a Scottish journalist, columnist, sports writer and novelist.[1][2] He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature
>source<

NSFW:
3535888463.jpg

Mr. Massie is the man in the light jacket



The vast majority of drug users , at all levels of society, shrug their shoulders at the law, which they probably regard as ridiculous, if also potentially oppressive.

Governments have at times spoken of a “war on drugs”. It’s a war that has been lost. It has failed to curb drug use. The individuals who appear in our sheriff courts are like the stragglers who have fallen behind an advancing army and are easily picked off by the forces of order. Meanwhile, despite the publicity given to “major drug hauls”, the criminal “Godfathers” continue to do very well, thank you, and their chief problem is how to launder their handsome profits.

There are two arguments to be made against our present drug laws; and they are both good. The first is philosophical; that they represent an unwarrantable restriction of personal liberty; that it is not the business of the state to tell us what we may or may not consume so long as this does not directly harm others. In practice, such libertarian arguments usually have to be shaded at the edges, an example being the law relating to abortion, which qualifies a woman’s right to control her own body by imposing a time limit on terminations of pregnancy. But in general the libertarian argument is sound, and should be respected.

The second argument is practical. The war on drugs has been lost. It “breeds crime”. Supply has not been curtailed, let alone choked off. The laws prohibiting drug use are widely disregarded. Consequently, people who are otherwise law-abiding view the law with hostility and contempt. This is not a desirable state of affairs.


I couldn't agree more, with this and really the whole article.

It's amazing how talented some people are at writing... pleasure to read this piece.

NSFW:
755791022.jpg


And those are a couple gaggers.. woman after my own heart.
 
Last edited:
My only issue with the article is that she uses ''decriminalization'' and ''legalization'' interchangeably.
 
"Everybody knows traders snort cocaine"

Well, this Everybody bloke has been sitting staring at the telly for too long. What a joke.
 
Top