San Francisco Police Hope Officers Can Do Drug Testing

seep

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
1,347
(03-18) 17:39 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- The number of narcotics cases that San Francisco prosecutors have dropped since the Police Department's drug-lab scandal went public is up to 180, and the district attorney says more cases will be dismissed until the city's police officers can perform basic tests on seized evidence in lieu of the closed lab.

The Police Department closed the lab March 9 amid suspicions that a technician there had been skimming and using cocaine. Since then, prosecutors say, about 30 cases a day have been dropped because no one has been able to test the drugs.

Police recruited outside labs to test some samples, but those labs are focusing on major cases approaching trial and defendants who have extensive criminal histories. Prosecutors are being forced to drop lesser cases and are unable to arraign most drug suspects arrested by police.

With the drug lab closed indefinitely, the department is giving crash courses in basic testing to officers in the narcotics and gang enforcement divisions, police spokeswoman Lt. Lyn Tomioka said Thursday.

The tests, once officers start doing them, should provide the basis for prosecutors to file charges, she said.

Chief George Gascón "would like everybody trained as soon as possible, if this works," Tomioka said. "This is a way to address the new crimes that are occurring."

Brian Buckelew, spokesman for District Attorney Kamala Harris, said that until that happens, prosecutors will still have to turn about 30 suspects loose daily.

Prosecutors face a judge's deadline of today to have drug evidence ready in 35 cases set to go to trial. Buckelew said he hopes that the outside labs that San Francisco has turned to will be able to finish that work in time.

The turmoil at the lab began when lab officials were alerted to possible cocaine theft by a criminalist, Deborah Madden, 60. Her sister contacted a lab supervisor Dec. 16 to report what she believed to be a police vial of the drug inside Madden's San Mateo home.

By then, Madden had gone on leave from the department and was undergoing drug and alcohol rehabilitation therapy. She retired March 1.

The information from Madden's sister, along with a quick sampling that showed at least one sealed package of cocaine may have been tampered with, was forwarded to the legal section of the Police Department. A criminal investigation was not launched until Feb. 22, however.

Madden has not been charged and has declined to comment.

Two weeks before Madden left the department, the American Society of Crime Lab Directors did a certification audit of the police lab. It found, among other things, that the lab had failed to secure a computer documenting drug evidence from unauthorized access. It also found that drug lab equipment had been contaminated with leftover narcotics.

Rather than issue a five-year extension on the crime lab's accreditation, the group gave police six months to fix the problems.

It's unclear when police told auditors about the Madden case. Ralph Keaton, executive director of the lab directors group, said he learned about it only last week.

"If there are any problems of a significant nature and the lab isn't notifying us, we will have to address it," Keaton said. His auditors will return to the crime lab in the next two weeks to do a follow-up inspection.

E-mail Jaxon Van Derbeken at [email protected].

This article appeared on page C - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/03/18/BA8A1CI38U.DTL#ixzz0iltQsse7
 
oh me, oh my, in house testing by street cops is scary, scary ! but S.F has been through worse and kicked them to the curb .
 
It's gonna be a bitch for them to charge her in a way that doesn't cast aspersions on much of the evidence she handled in the 20 years she was working in the lab. It goes beyond what she did and didn't dip her fingers into: it's the notion of one of the queen bees at the cop's drug lab having a particularly vicious addiction.

Can you imagine the avalanche of potential appeals?
 
Yeah, this is major news here. I am stoked but all the law and order types are up in arms about this shit.

PS- Legalize all drugs.
 
how common is this? i mean im sure it happens quite often and goes unreported, but are there other reported cases of agents/officers/technicians working in crime labs and stealing the drugs?
 
I hope she doesn't get charged b/c plainly she'd be a perfect scapegoat for any mistakes, mix-ups and deliberate skimming of confiscated drugs by the rest of the department. And, yes, I have lived in this city for 20 years and am familiar with the general tendency to "skim" by cops here. Pretty much the same in all cities so it's a common practice.

But the preponderance of medical marijuana clinics makes it easy for cops to confiscate weed, let the subject go and keep that weed. I live in a gentrifying but essentially working-class neighborhood where the cops like to hang out before and after shifts. I've heard them boasting about "scores" at the bar in my neighborhood that's popular with L/E. To be fair, most of them are pretty ok people and don't support the drug laws. But they have to do their job. And a lot of them like to smoke weed. To give you an example, there's not a night where I walk past that bar without seeing people smoking weed in front of the place. Smokers ranging in age from 16 to 75, pretty cool really.

The cops go to the bar to chill and bitch. From what I've heard first-hand, they'd far prefer to skip the minor shit that keeps them from doing the police work they'd like to do: addressing the escalating number of home invasions, armed robberies, violent crime and shootings. They don't give a half a shit about cats smoking a dutch on the streets. But it does keep their stash boxes full. And while that's fucked, I'd much rather have the cops take my weed than get an expensive citation or be arrested.

***
tl;dr

But I really wanted to just comment on her sister. Dropping a dime on your own flesh and blood? Nah. Not acceptable in my book. I know about sibling rivalry, but at age 60, the sister's got to be about her age and that's just a dirty, back-handed, skeezy move. I don't know if they were sharing living accommodations (and it sounds as if they weren't), but a simple "I'm worried about you" or a "I can't live with drugs in the house," followed by an honest conversation would have sufficed. Narcing her sister out is a shady, underhanded, dirty-dog move. (I just had to repeat that opinion because that behavior really infuriates me.)
 
I've heard them boasting about "scores" at the bar in my neighborhood that's popular with L/E. To be fair, most of them are pretty ok people and don't support the drug laws. But they have to do their job

Bullshit.


I guess cops who turn a blind eye aren't too bad, but overall, I don't much care for them.
 
Your drugs (or firearms) are your property. What sort of "crime" requires the police to test your property to determine your guilt? Can't the police just ask the victim to testify? No. The only "victim" is the accused. The police steal the suspect's property. I thought the government was supposed to protect our right to own property. It ain't a free country that steals your property and then puts you in prison for owning it.
 
Top