• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |

RoA for different effects?

Issac Sinclair

Bluelighter
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
381
In my case, snorting 2CE does not produce visuals, it feels much more amphetamine like, but when I eat it, it produces amazing visuals. Anyone else have the same experience, or different effects from RoA with any other drugs?
 
IM'ing vs. Snorting ketamine produces very different results, from what I've heard/read.

For me, Snorting MDMA produces a much different high as opposed to just taking it orally, in that it feels much speedier and tweaky if I snort.

4acodmt was much shorter acting nasally as opposed to orally.

My prefered RoA with most drugs is oral.
 
Yes IM vs snorted vs oral ketamine are all quite different.

The first one is the most effective (not considering I.V. for now), meaning there is less material needed and less is converted to norketamine which seems to usually result in unavoidable side-effects. But also a body high initially. Oral dosing is the least effective and might resemble taking pure norketamine the most although I cannot be sure.

With methylone and several other stimulants I find snorting it to produce more of a rush but also a stimmy superficial effect, while oral dosing is more laid back and empathogenic and slightly deeper. The more I redose the more oral doses start to resemble snorted doses.

I usually take psychedelics orally, I have snorted 2C-D and 2C-B before though and found the more abrupt comeup of 2C-B worth something but not worth the pain in my nose. But rectal 2C-B also produced a quite steep comeup but without many nasty side-effects.
In that respect I was reminded by I.M. ketamine which is the only drug I have ever I.M.ed, that too produced remarkably few side-effects and felt very pure.

Rectal and I.M. are very direct RoAs but for a lot of drugs they are just not really needed and oral dosing works fine. But rectal dosing is still damn good and it is not a terrible idea to try it with more different compounds. I just never really think of it, doesn't seem convenient as an idea. The mental blocks for I.M. and rectal are not small but there is a lot to gain!
 
In my case, snorting 2CE does not produce visuals, it feels much more amphetamine like, but when I eat it, it produces amazing visuals. Anyone else have the same experience, or different effects from RoA with any other drugs?

I had more intense visuals when I dosed 15mg oral in the morning, then a small insufflated dose of 3mg in the afternoon. The nasal dose really kicked things into a higher gear, visual wise. But yes, I did feel more stimulated compared to before I sniffed it.
 
i think there is a long story to be told here regarding plugging drugs. if i remember correctly some of the more famous drugs to use up there are aMT, which comes up faster and less nauseating and is a bit smoother like that, and methylone (and possibly APB type drugs), which seem to reduce the nasty after effects of said drugs.
personally i can only vouch for some cannabinoids and tryptamines oral vs smoked (duration wise, dose required, and heavier effects when eaten).
a good example would be 5 meo dalt, which is mildly psychedelic and entactogenic oral, while smoked is rather euphoric and stimulating (as well as a lot shorter).
 
Smoked DMT produces amazing visuals, oral its not even active.

At about ~250 mgs oral, methylone is rushy and entactogenic, I.M. Methylone at that same dose is very sedating and borderline hallucinogenic. (ive had some pretty cool visuals i.m. combined with weed)

I.M. ketamine has a much smoother and lighter feel to it opposed to insuffalation which produces a body load and is more foggy headed.

I share the same experiences as others with oral vs. Insuffalated MDMA. Plugging it makes it more chilled out and flooring to me, tend to yawn alot with that roa.

Insuffalated 2ct2 is a very intense, stimulating trip as where oral is a bit more balanced and fluid.

Ive done a couple other 2cx and various compounds oral and rectal. I'll basically generalize oral tends to have some ineffable feeling of fullness to it, maybe physical sensations might be more perceptible and drastic compared to rectal which lessens body load and tends to be more cerebral. (visuals/headspace) 4-aco dmt/2ce are worth exploring both roa's.
 
Last edited:
Top