A freebie with 20 mg 2C-E and 100 mg 4-FMA. Took half which was more as enough.
Oh ok, so then you don't really have much experience to base this opinion on.
Why that was my thought to, well they mix well suprisingly.
Yeah ok. You haven't used them independently, so I don't know how qualified that opinion is. You had
one experience taking 2C-E and 4-FMA and now you're proclaiming they mix well, despite stimulants and psychedelics traditionally not mixing well. Mocaine (shrooms + cocaine), Methcaline (meth + mescaline or 2C-B), LSDextroamphetamine, DMTina—you get the gist—they all suck as far as combos go (btw, no one calls them that; I just made those up). At least in my opinion and according to traditional wisdom on the subject.
Don t think i would like em more seperate, but a premixed product wit imo a double dose.
You wouldn't know unless and until you try it. In particular 2C-E is a profound trip. Meanwhile 4-FMA was noxious, unsettling, skin crawly stim garbage, to me, but as you point out, YMMV.
Are you sure someone can have something backwards, besides your underpants.
No, you're right. I must have got that info backwards
3 & 4-F[M]A were ime abundant, though 4-FA was plain irritating. YMMV.
Might've been your source. Personally, the ~dozen or so friends I shared it with and I all felt that it was a fairly decent drug with many of the same properties possessed by drugs like MDA, MDMA, MDE, the four Benzofury drugs, Methylone, et al. We all liked it and did not find it irritating the way we found 4-FMA to be. The inverse was true for the 2-substitution: 2-FMA is way better than 2-FA. Or it was I who had the shit source, who knows?
I am used to clean Amphetamines and MDMA, all the substitutions were kinda mixmag of.
Mostly speedy substances with some Serotonin.
Oh I know. I feel the same way about those compounds. I'm just saying, they also weren't just abject shit either.
Then again i hate Cocaine, Methylphenidate but love Khat. Not Cathinone, fresh full spectrum.
Ooh la la. Well if you have a source for it, then good on you. Try not to develop mouth, tongue and gum cancer if you ever use it daily. And yeah, I thought we already established that neither of us care for coke or Ritalin.
Weird enough all kids are not on Speed, Coke or MDMA, they all love 3-MMC.
All of them? Every single last one of them, no exception? Lols, idk man, maybe that's true in Europe, but in the U.S., these kids are all about coke, MDMA, and ketamine. Or they're tweekers using crystal meth. Sometimes it's mixed all together with pink food dye and sold as "Tusibi" or simply "Tusi" which came from some Columbian jackasses claiming they had the drug 2C-B when in fact it was just scraps of common street drugs jumbled together and inexplicably dyed pink.
Where is no reasonable explanenation for at all, tried it once.
A dirty stimulant that has won the favor of the youth.
Are you directing these comments at me? You know that I know all of these things, right? I'm not asking you for info on these drugs; I'm only asking about very specifically 3-FA bc I've never even seen it on the RC markets.
They raved over 4-MMC too, but that sounded a bit to good why i declined.
You seem to have a predilection for not trying things or only trying them one time with another compound and then acting like an expert on the subject. I think you should dip your proverbial toes in the water a bit more than that, but that's just my unsolicited $0.02.
While things like 2-FA which was akin to dextro-Amphetamine and 3-FPM, though i prefer dex.
To bad dr always end your script every so year. Are available. 5-MAPB. They want 3-MMC.
You might be generalizing and making assumptions based on your anecdotal experiences and local environment. There's a viable market for 5-MAPB, 5-APB, 6-MAPB, and 6-APB as much as there is one for 3-MMC in my opinion and experience.
Doctors don't end my scripts bc I seek out substances in a different manner that precludes dealing with this shortcoming.
Who btw hallowed MDMA and what does it imply ?
You hallowed it when you said calling 4-FA MDMA-like was "blasphemy" implying a religious context, as though MDMA were somehow "holy"… That's just silly; it's not that big of a deal and the comparison between 4-FA and MDMA is still pertinent.
And if your not looking for answers why it seemed you were asking ?
Because you're not paying attention to the close details of what I'm saying, and it also appears English may not be your first language, so don't sweat it.
Anyways, I never see hardly any mention of the meta-subbed fluorinated amphetamine, 3-FA. I was only asking about that one compound. Indeed, it's rarely sold or sought after.
Now back to my point regarding
2-FMA and 4-FA being the two good compounds while the rest are garbage, let's check it out on psychonautwiki. Ready?
☞ This is why 4-FMA is garbage:
"Similar to MDA, MDMA, 4-FA, and other substances that produce distinct pleasurable tactile 'roll'-like sensations, which is typically linked to serotonin-releasing properties, 4-FMA has been reported to be able to produce similar entactogenic effects in addition to traditional stimulant ones. Some reports suggest it tends to come with more side effects and bodily strain than other fluorinated amphetamines, explaining its lack of popularity and availability."
☞ This is why 2-FMA is a superior substituted amphetamine:
"In comparison to other substituted amphetamines, 2-FMA is reported to be relatively free of side effects such as nausea, high blood pressure, anxiety and an uncomfortable offset ("comedown"). It is considered to be a functional stimulant for performing general productivity tasks in a manner similar to amphetamine or lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)."
☞ And this is
what I understand of 3-FA and why I've never sought it out having done a half dozen other analogs many times over the years:
"… it is not unreasonable to assume that just like other substituted amphetamines with substitutions at similar positions (with the notable exception of 4-FA), it most likely acts primarily as both a dopamine and norepinephrine releasing agent, with modest selectivity for serotonin… 3-FA is considered to be a potent and complex stimulant with mild entactogenic undertones when compared to other substances in its class, like 4-FA. However, it does not have the productivity and focus-enhancing effects often claimed by users of 2-FMA which has had the effect of limiting its appeal."
It's just weird. While 2-FA is so-so, 2-FMA is much better. Meanwhile 4-FA is pretty fucking good stuff, but 4-FMA is uncomfortable garbage in my opinion. And while it seems the majority of trip reports I"m seeing agree with my conclusion, It is always possible I'm wrong. But again: not looking for answers really. Was just being friendly, having never tried, seen, or hardly heard about 3-FA on the street or in most RC shops.
.
My Oxford English has decayed over the years, had a 8.
English, grammar and spelling skills].
>< 
.
you might need it on the way.
.