• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Respect

After four pages in as many hours, I score it SHM 5, MSB 0. If MSB's charity help to Southern Sudan translates as a few bob to Oxfam, 6-0.

Sure, Galloway is a bighead. Unlike the mainstream politicos, who are all so terribly modest. And he's friendly with tyrants. Unlike the established parties, who are pals only with our tyrants. If, as MSB tells us, grotesquely repressive regimes like Saudi and Kuwait 'fight terrorism', it's only to maintain their monopoly on the commodity.

I suspect MSB is really a Respect plant, sent to sites like this to raise support among the doped and indifferent with his brilliant Borat-style take off of a right-wing bigot. Good work, conrade!
 
lol how many of the palestinian people do you think get a say in whether the government accepts a deal or not?
 
Stop pulling the first wiki page you find and do some real research. Even on wiki pages you can follow why neither the American Indian camps nor the Spanish/Cuban ones bore any resemblance to what followed in the Boer War (or Nazi Germany)

You claim to have this great knowledge but are constantly called out for pulling up wiki pages without fully reading them or anything around them.

But less me guess. You did 'concentration camps' in the second lesson at your top red-brick (ooh, chip on the shoulder about not being good enough for Oxbridge?) university.

I didn't cover concentration camps in any way, I was just fact checking what you guys said. You said we created the first one - we didn't. So I guess you were wrong. Then I thought; Why the fuck does it matter if the British were the first to make concentration camps? Does that negate the part Palestinians had to play in the holocaust? No. Does it negate the fact that Palestinians stood in the way of Jews trying to flee, resulting in the deaths of many of them? No. And I don't recall posting another wiki page on here, but I might have done I don't know. Still, it beats the fuck out of trying to defend my opinion with an opinion column taken from a blog like you did earlier in this thread.
 
Stop pulling the first wiki page you find and do some real research. Even on wiki pages you can follow why neither the American Indian camps nor the Spanish/Cuban ones bore any resemblance to what followed in the Boer War (or Nazi Germany)

You claim to have this great knowledge but are constantly called out for pulling up wiki pages without fully reading them or anything around them.

But less me guess. You did 'concentration camps' in the second lesson at your top red-brick (ooh, chip on the shoulder about not being good enough for Oxbridge?) university.

=D =D =D winner.
 
I'm not blaming 'us' I'm blaming a very small minority that always profit whether we are at war or not.

Whether other countries are at war or not.

If it's a boom or if it's a bust.

They always profit and most of the world loses.

Your answer to the fact that Palestinians had direct involvement in the holocaust, and in fact planned to wipe Jews out in their area with Hitlers help, was to tell me that the British were the first to start concentration camps.

And so, the circle jerking begins. Enjoy guys :) O we're so liberal. Here SHM have a hand job. No you have the first hand job conrad. No, I think MOP deserves one. No let's all give each other one at the same time. Yayyyyyyy. We are so tolerrant and understanding of the world. Yipppeeee. We can all feel we are right by only going on forums where everyone agrees with us, where we pick on anyone who disagrees because they get in the way of quality circle jerking time.
 
If it is wrong to take land, then the Palestinians were wrong to take it in the first place. If it isn't wrong to take land, then the Israelis had a right to take it back.

Look at the history of Palestine and you'll see that 'The Palestinians' never took the land. It was the Romans who set the ball rolling in the conquest of Judea, and eventually what is now known as Palestine was annexed by the Islamic Empire (around the year 636). Also, the Palestinian attempts to address the 'Jewish Problem' took place while Britiain was in charge of the administration of Palestine.

If you can justify Israeli attempts to take back what is 'theirs', then why don't we take this to its logical conclusion and tell the English fuck off out of Britain?
 
Last edited:
Your answer to the fact that Palestinians had direct involvement in the holocaust, and in fact planned to wipe Jews out in their area with Hitlers help, was to tell me that the British were the first to start concentration camps.

And so, the circle jerking begins. Enjoy guys :) O we're so liberal. Here SHM have a hand job. No you have the first hand job conrad. No, I think MOP deserves one. No let's all give each other one at the same time. Yayyyyyyy. We are so tolerrant and understanding of the world. Yipppeeee. We can all feel we are right by only going on forums where everyone agrees with us, where we pick on anyone who disagrees because they get in the way of quality circle jerking time.

Hey sounds like fun! Anyone got any DOB? I'm not gay but if we close our eyes we could go on for hours!
 
Look at the history of Palestine and you'll see that 'The Palestinians' never took the land. It was the Romans who set the ball rolling in the conquest of Judea, and eventually what is now known as Palestine was annexed by the Islamic Empire (around the year 636).

If you can justify Israeli attempts to take back what is 'theirs', then why don't we take this to its logical conclusion and tell the English fuck off out of Britain?

The Islamic empire was made up almost exclusively of Arabs around the year 636. Don't try and hide behind the fact 'Palestinians' as a group of people didn't exist then. My point is that that land has changed hands more times than I care to count. If you live on land that you took by force don't moan when you lose it by force. The same goes for the Israelis too. If the Palestinians turn up with a huge army one day and take it back, i'll support their right to do so. It is the only way to be fair about the whole issue.
 
Look at the history of Palestine and you'll see that 'The Palestinians' never took the land. It was the Romans who set the ball rolling in the conquest of Judea, and eventually what is now known as Palestine was annexed by the Islamic Empire (around the year 636).

If you can justify Israeli attempts to take back what is 'theirs', then why don't we take this to its logical conclusion and tell the English fuck off out of Britain?

Yo sam. Let's go back the true Brits have been chased out of England plenty of times over the years by various army's.

I think they reside in places like Scotland and Ireland.

Maybe they should reclaim their land so the clans can be free!

Apart from Old Trafford. We'll sort that at the negotiating table :)
 
Hey sounds like fun! Anyone got any DOB? I'm not gay but if we close our eyes we could go on for hours!

Well, i'm off out, so enjoy going at it for hours. I won't be wasting my time coming back on this thread, or any where you guys clearly just set out to all agree like clones for that matter. So have at it.
 
The Islamic empire was made up almost exclusively of Arabs around the year 636. Don't try and hide behind the fact 'Palestinians' as a group of people didn't exist then. My point is that that land has changed hands more times than I care to count. If you live on land that you took by force don't moan when you lose it by force. The same goes for the Israelis too. If the Palestinians turn up with a huge army one day and take it back, i'll support their right to do so. It is the only way to be fair about the whole issue.

It's only fair if my brother is bigger than your brother!

Come on man!
 
If you live on land that you took by force don't moan when you lose it by force.

The Islamic Empire was almost exclusively Arab back then, yes. However, the non-Hebrew inhabitants of Canaan / The Levant / Israel-Judea were not considered 'Arabs' until they were subsumed into the Islamic Empire. The very definition of 'Arab' as a race / ethnicity rather than a culture is an extremely flawed one.

MOP said:
Yo sam. Let's go back the true Brits have been chased out of England plenty of times over the years by various army's.

I think they reside in places like Scotland and Ireland.

Tru, Moppers - and Devon, Cornwall, Cumbria, Wales and parts of NW England too.

That's why there are plenty of people with dark hair, fair skin and dark eyes around those parts.
 
The Islamic Empire was almost exclusively Arab back then, yes. However, the non-Hebrew inhabitants of Canaan / The Levant / Israel-Judea were not considered 'Arabs' until they were subsumed into the Islamic Empire. The very definition of 'Arab' as a race / ethnicity rather than a culture is an extremely flawed one.

Bring back Alexanda the Great. He wanted to unify the east and West and even now has been the only person that nearly did it.
 
Well, i'm off out, so enjoy going at it for hours. I won't be wasting my time coming back on this thread, or any where you guys clearly just set out to all agree like clones for that matter. So have at it.

Haha! Don't get yourself in a strop now.

Look, you've been here long enough to know that most of the board members aren't Rightwing Christians. Do you think that you're so clever, articulate and original that the pearls you drop here are going to make people think "Oh, yeah. I've got it all wrong, silly me!"?

People take different stances on issues based on their life experience, most people here take a certain position that is inconsistent with your views. Your political and religious views are never going to be well received on this site, just like mine wouldn't be at a rightwing, conservative, or creationist board.

Keep believing what you believe, but don't expect your words to have any power over others.
 
Still, it beats the fuck out of trying to defend my opinion with an opinion column taken from a blog like you did earlier in this thread.

Yes, you seem to have a problem with facts. Which was what that blog was reporting. Care to challenge the results of the wards it declared voted for Galloway?

Or do you run away when your 'opinion' is challenged by facts you don't like?


I didn't cover concentration camps in any way, I was just fact checking what you guys said. You said we created the first one - we didn't. n I thought; Why the fuck does it matter if the British were the first to make concentration camps? So I guess you were wrong.

For a history graduate you seem to have a problem with facts and research.


And I don't recall posting another wiki page on here, but I might have done I don't know.

Plenty. One I particularly remember was a Dagenham election result in which you posted local elections when you thought you were posting general elections - and the general election pages proved you 100% wrong. There have been others.
 
Last edited:
Well, i'm off out, so enjoy going at it for hours. I won't be wasting my time coming back on this thread, or any where you guys clearly just set out to all agree like clones for that matter. So have at it.

because we don't agree with you we are all clones? come on... incredibly stupid/i failed at the argument thing to say
 
And don't forget it was us that set up the state of Israel in the first place and don't try and tell me we had nothing to do with the nuclear weapons they have that they still say they haven't got.

That's what pisses me off about the fuss about Iran getting nukes.

Somedays I think to my self for fuck sake push the fucking button get rid of us all and give this beautiful planet another chance without us.

And then come back as a peacock (male one of course, they're much cooler)
 
Top