Red wine-heart research slammed with fraud charges

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
A University of Connecticut researcher who studied the link between aging and a substance found in red wine has committed more than 100 acts of data fabrication and falsification, the university said Wednesday, throwing much of his work into doubt.

Dipak K. Das, who directed the university's Cardiovascular Research Center, studied resveratrol, touted by a number of scientists and companies as a way to slow aging or remain healthy as people get older. Among his findings, according to a work promoted by the University of Connecticut in 2007, was that "the pulp of grapes is as heart-healthy as the skin, even though the antioxidant properties differ."

"We have a responsibility to correct the scientific record and inform peer researchers across the country," Philip Austin, the university's interim vice president for health affairs, said in a statement.

The university said an anonymous tip led to an investigation that began in 2008. A 60,000-page report -- the summary of which is available at http://bit.ly/xkyS4A -- resulted, outlining 145 counts of fabrication and falsification of data. Other members of Das' laboratory may have been involved, and are being investigated, the report continues.

UConn has "declined to accept $890,000 in federal grants awarded to" Das, according to the statement, and has begun dismissal proceedings. The university has alerted 11 journals that published Das' work, and has also worked on the case with the U.S. Office of Research Integrity, which investigates alleged misconduct by federal grant recipients.

cont at
http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/sns-rt-us-red-wine-hearttre80b0bh-20120111,0,1759103.story
 
Well then, that's disappointing.
I wonder how much other "research" out there is false.
I hope time will tell.
 
I heard this on the radio today. "60,000 page report"...holy shit. How many people did they have in on this investigation? I can't even begin to imagine what they would write 60,000 pages about.

Anyone who has done any serious scientific research for a period of time knows the temptation to fabricate data. When you spend thousands of hours, even many years, working alone on a single small problem and encounter hurdle after hurdle, inconsistent results, bad luck, experiments that seem to fail for no reason...it slowly becomes easier to justify even though it obviously defeats the point of all your hard work in the first place. Western society, particularly in America, demands fast and consistent results. You are made to feel embarrassed and worthless if you can't show hard results after months of toiling away.

I'm very impressed by the way UConn has handled this, instead of trying to sweep it under the rug.
 
I remember hearing something about like 20 or so scientific research that's been discredited, it actually happens A LOT.
It's really terrible, unfortunately I can't remember anything specific about the "research" that was discredited a few months back.

I'm sure a google search would overload anyone with many results of fraud.
 
i used to manage a fairly large health-club that had a ton of older members, and like many old timers in the fitness industry they wanted to stay as young as long as possible so they all started selling and drinking this shit called monavie or something, and it was supposed to have reservetrol in it and made all these claims about helping and fighting diseases and bla bla bla bla the shit was like 40$ a bottle the size of a normal wine bottle. turned out to be a pyramid scheme or something because all the dumb asses that got invovled made no money lol

i knew from the get go it was just concentrated grape juice lol
 
Top