• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Random MSN Gibberings LXXVI - Hear mi pon di radio, see mi pon di telly...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Initially, in the H regional/social threads I thought you were being a bit paranoid with your suspicions re the 'Frontline' poster but then after about 5 more odd comments [incl the big issue related ones] I got the inkling he was trying to very subtly troll. still not 100% sure tho tbh. especially as he seemed to be good buddies with a few sound old school BL posters.

Nahi just been in n around the S/W scene for long enough to know if someones spinning fat yarns .
You no taking other folks chat n claiming it as their own that sorta thing .

I wasn't trying to be nasty but i done lived it n lost loads n not material stuff well loads of that but i mean people.
I'm only just over a year away from that sorta life. I still indulge but t'aint glamorous like it can seem when your young .
My last few posts are just what i 'm doing n t'aint often i do it these days.
The way i see it tis the same as anyone else n their DOC be it speed , K etc...
you get me ?
 
Ah, the lighthearted haven of fun and frivolity that is Gibberings. My sanctuary from all the hate and anger in the world... ;)
 
@ MSB: ^^ great observation and post

you get a golf clap for saying absolutely nothing
 
So let's see your peer reviewed scientific papers that back up your viewpoint, or shall we just take the easy route out of this one by saying it's just right wingers ignorantly generalising the poor ol' lefties?
 
scousekittehsa128506280538281250.jpg




Where is the love <3
 
erm. whatever tangled web you like to weave, by sidestepping, detraction and general arrogant nonsense .. it all goes back to this statement you made. which I considered to be too ridiculous to respond to, SHM is a more tenacious fucker and kudos to him for giving it a go.

The only reason left wingers are cleverer is because intelligence leads people into making choices just to seem different.

can you back that up with scientific peer reviewed papers?
 
erm. whatever tangled web you like to weave, by sidestepping, detraction and general arrogant nonsense .. it all goes back to this statement you made. which I considered to be too ridiculous to respond to, SHM is a more tenacious fucker and kudos to him for giving it a go.

The only reason left wingers are cleverer is because intelligence leads people into making choices just to seem different.

can you back that up with scientific peer reviewed papers?

Yes, it is the novelty seeking behaviour. There is nothing novel about being right wing.

Define: Novel
nov·el/ˈnävəl/

Adjective:
New or unusual in an interesting way: "a novel idea to make some money".
 
when blunts go's 4 it he don't play .
The man makes his statements with conviction .
Wether we like it or not n as much as i may think he's chatting crap i respeck him for the way he is .
 
Clocking in to say I hate alcohol, and I'm a proper cunt. The other night I went out, on alcohol alone (given stims up completely for the gym)... Punched a guy in the face for not giving me a cig and then back handed his girlfriend. Feel so bad.
 
The only reason left wingers are cleverer is because intelligence leads people into making choices just to seem different.

Erm... just where in the link you provided does it say that these different choices are deliberate affectations? Can't seem to find that bit at all.

Mugz: Oh dear. :)
 
Erm... just where in the link you provided does it say that these different choices are deliberate affectations? Can't seem to find that bit at all.

I should have said just because it is or seems different, or for the novelty of it. It wasn't supposed to be a slight against left wingers.
 
The paper you linked to only says the behaviour is novel (i.e. new and interesting), not that it's prompted by a conscious desire to seem different.
 
Yes, it is the novelty seeking behaviour..

erm, go back. start again. look at the reason you gave

IT'S TOSH. even when compared with your pysh link.

you've taken the article, run with it, spun it, cast your predisposition and ignored the purpose.

... just to seem different

I stand by my first comment. that comment has to be a wind up.

it seems you don't understand your own sources
 
the reasoning in the article is totally different than your own joke of a comment

[edit]
from your source

"General intelligence, the ability to think and reason, endowed our ancestors with advantages in solving evolutionarily novel problems for which they did not have innate solutions,"

it makes a big difference
 
The paper you linked to only says the behaviour is novel (i.e. new and interesting), not that it's prompted by a conscious desire to seem different.

Not just to seem different, because it is different. It takes intelligence to break the mould, but whether breaking the mould is actually the right way to do things is up for debate. As is whether it is a subconcious choice or a concious choice. Intelligent people gravitate towards evolutionarily unique things/beliefs etc. Precisely because it is novel.
 
I think that Ryan Giggs is most likely smarter than David Beckham, or are we talking about different kinds of wingers? Are left wingers smarter than centre backs too? 8)

thats a nice angle you found Mugz Giggs is Welsh n Beckham English we could go for miles with this one .
Personally i think left footers & left handers (batsmen ) are always more elegant it just one of those things we all take for granted .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top