Leprechaun
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2000
- Messages
- 1,582
Thanks heaps man! Nice work! :D
Cowboy Mac said:I agree that they don't do much, but from a goverment perspective if they had to run ads, these are quite good because they show (generally) realistic side-effects. It I was in charge of the purse it would be a lot different, a HR approach, but that isn't going to happen in a hurry. The government could have done a lot worse with these ads.
OT: They did. Remember the guy who tried to do some electrical works in his roof, and then his wife hears a thudding sound and calls out to him? "Frank? Fraaank? FRRAAAAAAAANNNNKKKK!!!!"Why don't they bring out a campaign on the dangers of dying within your own home?
I agree the 'ecstasy' one isn't as good as the other two, and falling over in a club is more likely to happen on GHB/1,4b than any pill and the bruxia and the dentist scene is also playing on peoples fear that they will have problems with their teeth if they use MDMA. In my mind they could have been a lot worse., and perhaps that's why I think they are pretty well done. I mean they could have shown people dying left, right and centre.brendanwor said:Possible side effects that are relatively extremely rare. Why don't they bring out a campaign on the dangers of dying within your own home? More likely to die from that than MDMA
mrK!NGP!N said:Has anyone noticed the amount of anti drug ads on tv lately ??? i guess from all the shit happening in bali at the moment,but i noticed they have different ads i.e. one just for Ecstasy and one for Speed both showing people at night clubs having seizures and shit with the end saying You dont know what it'll do to you... Hahahahahah well i know what it does to me :-D
K!NGP!N
Cowboy Mac said:the dentist scene is also playing on peoples fear that they will have problems with their teeth if they use MDMA.
Has anyone noticed the amount of anti drug ads on tv lately ??? i guess from all the shit happening in bali at the moment